Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Henawy summary

@henawy01

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,518subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001534677249
TypeChannel
Username@henawy01
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/henawy01

Growth

4,5184,5224,5207 August 2026 — 4,522 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,521 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,519 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,518 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,517–4,523 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 14:534,518-1
11 Aug 2026, 14:424,519-2
8 Aug 2026, 08:084,521-1
7 Aug 2026, 11:474,522first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.9%
avg views ÷ 4,518 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,480
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.633%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held15 (22 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total22,271
Reactions total141
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

141 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13192.9%
👏21.42%
🥰21.42%
10.709%
🏆10.709%
👍10.709%
🔥10.709%
😁10.709%
🤔10.709%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 141reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC≈1,120 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @allahCreationPhoto

ريش طاووس 📸: Vivek Sadasivan

19

1 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC≈1,480 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

السلام عليكم يا شباب عايز طلب من زمايلنا اللي كان عندهم سمر في ال ID وباطنه وجراحة و مواد الترم التاني من رابعة محتاج نصايحكم وتجربتكم للدفعة الأصغر لإن اكيد انتو عارفين الفترة دي موترة جدا خصوصا للناس اللي معاها اكتر من مادة ومحتاجة تنظيم وقت كويس ومصادر كويسة مختصرة ( انا مثلا 😁 ) ومصادر الحل المهمة فياريت لو تكتبولي تجاربكم واللي تنصحوا بيه عشان اوصله ليهم شكرا مقدما @Elhenawy3

👍1

1 Aug 2026, 05:34 UTC≈1,760 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

زميلنا جمعلنا عدد ساعات ال family medicine من قناة فاينل ريفجن ووقت كل محاضرة عشان لو حد بيظبط جدوله جزاه الله خيرا

12

31 Jul 2026, 16:04 UTC≈1,950 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

موقع رايق لنتيجة ثانوية عامة بيعمل analysis كامل بالترتيب بتوقع التنسيق حاجة كدا شغل فاخر من الاخر تحية لزميلنا عبدو حمدي https://natgea-thnaweya.vercel.app

8

30 Jul 2026, 19:51 UTC≈1,330 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

هانت والله يا جدعان ربنا يطلعنا منها بصحتنا علي خير يارب 🥰

16

29 Jul 2026, 19:55 UTC≈1,420 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ASM_Minds_4th_generationFile

File, posted without a caption

21🔥1😁1

29 Jul 2026, 17:47 UTC≈1,230 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ASM_Minds_4th_generationPhoto

⌛جاهزين للراوند الأخير ؟ الأكيد إننا جاهزين بكتب وشرح كامل لراوند ال family medicine 📌ال ٤ كتب جديدة محدثة طبقاً لآخر تحديث للمنهج ⭐️اهتمينا جدا اننا نختم معاكم رحلة الخمس سنين بأفضل شغل ممكن من أود التصميم والألوان لحد الصياغة وترتيب المعلومات وتنسيق الكتب ✅مش هتحتاجوا شئ إضافي عن كتب ASM بإذن الله ✅كتب ال Family Medicine موجودة من دلوقتي في فروعنا وتقدروا تطلبوها عن طريق واتساب من هنا https://wa.me/201222367

4

24 Jul 2026, 20:56 UTC≈1,940 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

ده امتحان اطفال برضه بتاع راوند من السنادي انا حليته وقت الراوند بتاعي وجه منه كتير في سؤالين كانو غلط بس مش فاكرهم

8

24 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC≈1,970 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

اهم اسئلة فايل الاسئلة اللي ملهاش صور حاولت احطلها صور هتلاقوها من اول هنا

2

24 Jul 2026, 15:07 UTC≈1,810 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

ده امتحانا هما مش ٧١ سؤال هما ٧٠ عادي بس فيه سؤال او سؤالين انا مش فاكرهم فحطيت اللي انا شااكك فيهم #gyna_obs_MCQ

5

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @henawy01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 555,334 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Henawy summary” (@henawy01), 4,518 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/henawy01.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.