Voice message, posted without a caption
Signed Nader Shirani

Channel
@hemato_channel
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,414subscribers
+51 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001000690729 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hemato_channel |
| Created | 24 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hemato_channel |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Recorded in 2019 as “Hemato هماتو” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 00:19 | 7,414 | -5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 7,419 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 12:36 | 7,421 | +23 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:18 | 7,398 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:29 | 7,399 | +3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 7,396 | +7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 7,389 | +7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 7,382 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 7,383 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 7,385 | +3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 7,382 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:41 | 7,377 | +13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:56 | 7,364 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 7,363 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 7,363 | first reading |
191 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 191 (5 August 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 15,389 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 23:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Voice message, posted without a caption
Signed Nader Shirani
سلام روز بخیر برای نوزادان به جای خون شسته شده نمیشه از کم لکوسیت استفاده کرد؟و اگر جواب بله هست چرا پزشک اصرار بر شسته شده داره
Signed Nader Shirani
Voice message, posted without a caption
Signed Nader Shirani
سلام و ارادت ببخشید بابت مزاحمت یکی از اقوام بنده تهران بیمارستان شریعتی بستری هستن و مبتلا به AMlm1 با کانت پلاکت ۸ هزار،سه روزه درگیر ومعطل برای جور کردن پلاکتشون هستن که نشده اقای دکتر کسی رو سازمان انتقال خون نمیشناسن که سفارشی برای ما کنن ؟؟
Signed Nader Shirani
Voice message, posted without a caption
Signed Nader Shirani
سلام وقتتون بخیر یه سوال داشتم از آقای دکتر، در آنالایزرهای انعقادی پارامترهای مختلفی مثل حجم برداشتی ریجنت و سمپل و طول موج و زمان انکوباسیون و .... برای تستهایی مثل pro C, pro S وجود داره که کیت به کیت متفاوت هست و طبق بروشور برای دستگاه تعریف میشه، میخواستم ببینم آیا برای تست PT و PTT هم چنین تفاوتی بین کیت ها هست؟ اصلا چیزی تحت عنوان پارامتر برای این دو تست تعریف شده یا بین کیتهای مختلف یکسان هستند؟ تا اونجا که…
Signed Nader Shirani
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Nader Shirani
درود آقای دکتر ، این بند در ادامه ی افرادی که PhD گرفتن هست و ذکر شده حتی افراد با PhD هم باید مدرک کارشناسی آنها مورد تایید باشه ، برای بچه های ارشد هم به همین ترتیب علت جمع بستنش هم ، وجود استسنای زیست شناسی سلولی مولکولی هست که اگر اگر اگر PhD ژنتیک پزشکی بگیرن و صلاحیت بده کمیسیون نظام پزشکی، می تونن فعالیت بکنند (منبع) در آیین نامه تاسیس آزمایشگاه هم هست این موضوع و منظور از کلمه ی وزارت، وزارت بهداشت هست که ابت…
Signed Nader Shirani
بله درجاتی از چراغ سبز به انها وجود دارد. شجاعت، بلاغت، جسارت، درایت، حقانیت همیشه اجماع ندارند.
Signed Nader Shirani
عرض ادب جناب دکتر این رشته های مصوب وزارت در کارشناسی یعنی چی؟چرا قشنگ نمینویسن علوم آزمایشگاهی؟این ابهام بعنی کسی که پایه غیر مرتبط داشته با ارشد یا دکترا علوم آز میتونه تو ازمایشگاه کار کنه؟
Signed Nader Shirani
سلام پنجشنبه 8 تا 10 سخنرانی محور و 10 تا 12 کارگاه کنترل کیفی دارم و شرمنده که نمیتوانم کنارتان باشم.
Signed Nader Shirani
یک رشته، یک آینده؛ این بار نوبت ماست. دوست هم رشته من مطمئنا این سوال و دغدغه برایت بوجود آمده که آینده این رشته کجاست ؟ و چه زمانی حال آزمایشگاه ها و صاحبان اصلی آن ینی دانش آموختگان علوم آزمایشگاهی خوب میشه ؟ سالها تلاشهایی برای تغییر شرایط و احیای روزهای خوب گذشته انجام شده، اما بسیاری به نتیجه نرسیدهاند؛ شاید چون هیچوقت به اندازه کافی کنار هم نبودهایم. این بار قرار نیست فقط درباره مشکلات حرف بزنیم. میخو…
Signed Nader Shirani
Showing the 12 most recent of 191 posts we hold for @hemato_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hemato of ARTA-Lab” (@hemato_channel), 7,414 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hemato_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.