Channel
@helzy_crypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,401subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001602971260 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @helzy_crypto |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/helzy_crypto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 2,401 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 2,405 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 2,405 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
186 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 72 | 38.7% | |
| ❤ | 49 | 26.3% | |
| 👍 | 45 | 24.2% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 8.06% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.08% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 1.08% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.538% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 March 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😢 Спасибо, GRVT накормили хуями Команда предоставила нам выбор: ▫️х1 токенов на тге без клиффа ▫️Клифф 4 месяца и х2 токенов ▫️Клифф 8 месяцев и х4 токенов 🗳️Выбираем здесь: https://grvt.io/exchange/reward-portal (если скипнуть, то вам просто выдадут х1 на тге), 17 июля дедлайн Так же можно выбрать, в какой сети получить: GRVT/BSC/ETH /// Я выбрал «получить на тге», эфир чейн, фьючей на токен не вижу, а без фьюче…
👍5❤1
🔫 Bullet - очередной перп или что-то новое? Если сильно упростить, то торговля на Bullet исполняется в отдельном высокопроизводительном чейне, а безопасность, финальный расчет и доступность данных через Solana Bullet делают создатели Zeta Markets (через Zeta прошло более $15 млрд торгового объема, команда уже имеет огромный опыт) Всего команда привлекла $13,5 млн инвестиций (Electric Capital, Jump, Wintermute, Sol…
👍6❤1🔥1😁1
💎GRVT проведёт ТГе уже 21 июля Писал про него тут и тут В целом, кейс выходит очень даже приятный, если за поинт выйдет 6$+, у меня 2к поинтов и 5к$ успел нафармить с ваульта, ждём тге. В круг получается ~24% апр
👍6😁4❤1
🚀 Coinshift × Curated (Impossible Finance) - до 30% апр токенами + 8–13% апр на стейблы Impossible Finance запустили новую TVL-кампанию с Coinshift (17.5кк$ инвеста) Что делать и что предлагают? ▫️Закидываем USDC по ссылке ▫️Начинаем кушать 8–13% апр ▫️Получаем до 30% в $SHIFT на момент дропа (кампания для первых $5 млн TVL), далее - 15% ▫️30x буст к Coinshift Points. Условия кампании: ▫️Продлится 6 месяцев ▫️Депо…
❤8👍1
❤️Клеймим награды от Ethena за поинты HyENA / Ethereal Линк на клейм за HyEna: https://app.sablier.com/airdrops/campaign/0x9cfde37ddc45d48c2c163fb267d7dd922fba820b-999 Линк на клейм за Ethereal: https://app.sablier.com/airdrops/campaign/0x68177f9e40fd4dedd2487209820c8d461fd034b7-1 Внимание: это не основной дроп Ethereal, но основной за HyENA, своего токена перп HyENA не планировал
❤7👍2🔥2
😂 Итоги гемного IPO SpaceX ◽️2 первых лаунчпада мекса - фантики ◽️Рект хеджа мекс в паре с бинансом/битгетом/байбитом/хайпером (если закрылись раньше листинга) ◽️Гейт 2.5% аллока на сайз ◽️Бинанс фулл бек ◽️Байбит фулл бек ◽️Кракен фулл бек ◽️ТГ валлет - 60% одобрили, шок ◽️Мекс последний лаунчпад - ??? (фулл бек в итоге)
❤5😁1
Кракен вернул Байбит вернул Бинанс вернул Гейт и мекс - вы следующие😈 апд: гейт тоже вернул, около 2.5% аллоки вышло
👍4❤1
фак, приходится отменять бронь на феррари, спейсх, за что ты так..
😁12
Щас дождемся акций мекса ниже цены ипо и перестанут они быть фантиками, будем держать и верить🙏
❤3😁3
Скоро уже будет пост от проминта, что он замультил кракен на 1000 акков по 10$?
😁18❤1
ладно, криптовалюту закрываем, увидимся через пару лет! кракен хуесосы, ждем продолжения шилла ахуенной биржи кракена от снг через неделю
😁3
Video, posted without a caption
🙏2😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @helzy_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 166,211 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“helzy | crypto” (@helzy_crypto), 2,401 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/helzy_crypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.