кому правда интересен мой канал переходите там будут нарезки, батлы и тд., го там добьем подписчиков
Signed 𐙚 𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙝𝙖˙#

Channel
@helpfrlishas
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
103subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001606311748 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @helpfrlishas |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/helpfrlishas |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:41 | 103 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 104 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 104 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
32 reactions across 5 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5397763319627027645 | 7 | 21.9% | |
| custom 5355268268955298605 | 4 | 12.5% | |
| custom 5294029156370124861 | 3 | 9.38% | |
| custom 5332646354084718676 | 3 | 9.38% | |
| 👾 | 3 | 9.38% | |
| custom 5330299562479351521 | 2 | 6.25% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 6.25% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 6.25% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 6.25% | |
| custom 5357163144101784916 | 1 | 3.13% | |
| custom 5357540521403245265 | 1 | 3.13% | |
| custom 5397643799277106399 | 1 | 3.13% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 3.13% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
кому правда интересен мой канал переходите там будут нарезки, батлы и тд., го там добьем подписчиков
Signed 𐙚 𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙝𝙖˙#
мой новый тгк (по возможности продвиньте ) переходим : @helpfrlishask
👾3
Signed 𐙚 𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙝𝙖˙#
репостните по возможности
Signed 𐙚 𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙝𝙖˙#🪐
https://t.me/lhelpfrlishask мой новый тгк подписываемся кто следит за мной, надеюсь там будет актив, тк на этом его вообще нету, жаль что я тогда ленилась (
Signed 𐙚 𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙝𝙖˙#🪐
я хз мб все посты удалить и заново начать, тк ваще никакого актива я хз, и напоминаю ищу админов🥺
Signed 𐙚 𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙝𝙖˙#🪐
Реакции
Signed 𐙚 𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙝𝙖˙#🌪️
— new post ot lisha ‘ 𐙚 𝜗𝜚 связки с чжан мяо и [98шт] #связки #актриса #чжанмяои взяли связки «+» в ком и реакция на пост!
custom 53977633196270276453❤1🎉1custom 53976437992771063991
Signed 𐙚 𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙝𝙖˙#🌪️
Давайте кидайте запросы на нарезки в течение дня. Всё выполню! Какой запрос придёт первым, тот и сделаю первым
Signed 𝚛𝚊𝚖𝚒
реакции
Signed 𝚛𝚊𝚖𝚒
- new post • баzа!. : . . : ⌞ #пылающеелето × #чжоувань × #лусисяо⌝ ᥫ᭡ ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, . - ʙɜяᴧи бᴀɜу «+» ʙ ᴋᴏʍ . : ᴩᴇᴀᴋцию нᴀ ᴨᴏᴄᴛ . . : . - ᴏᴛʍᴇᴛᴋᴀ ʙ ᴛᴛ : @ya_llina. :
custom 53977633196270276454🔥2🥰2❤1
Signed 𐙚 𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙝𝙖˙#🌪️
лс : @Kotik2161
Signed 𐙚 𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙝𝙖˙#🌪️
ВСЕМ ПРИВЕТ, я не понимаю почему никто не хочет быть админом, я устала искать, мне очень жалко канал, тк я набирала подписчиков большим трудом, и мне очень грустно что он просто гниет, по этому пж админы найдитесь я прошу, сама не могу все делать и вывозить я думаю все это понимают, и плюсом я в селе и лето, я не могу днями делать нарезки сама, пишите пж я не кусаюсь, и запросы не очень часто, буду целовать руки если…
Signed 𐙚 𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙝𝙖˙#🌪️
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @helpfrlishas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,011,696 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@helpfrlishas named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝙝𝙚𝙡𝙥 𝙛𝙧 𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙝𝙖 ❀” (@helpfrlishas), 103 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/helpfrlishas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.