Channel
@hejazipt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,278subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001480175160 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hejazipt |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hejazipt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 1,278 | +2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:38 | 1,276 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 1,274 | +7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 1,267 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 1,264 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
132 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 99 | 75.0% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 14.4% | |
| 🙏 | 11 | 8.33% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 2.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 September 2025 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔴 از بزرگترین اشتباهاتی که در مسیر مطالعه برای کنکورها میبینم: ⚠️ تعداد زیادی از داوطلبانی که باهاشون صحبت میکنم، یک الگوی مشترک دارن: 📚 شروع میکنن به خوندن از چند منبع همزمان، بدون این که بدونن کدوم مبحث واقعاً پرتکرارتره یا مهمتره و کدوم رو میتونن سبکتر رد کنن. نتیجه چی میشه؟؟؟ بعد از دو سه ماه حس میکنن خیلی خوندن، اما وقتی تست میزنن، نتیجهای که میبینن، با مقدار زحمتی که کشیدن همخوانی نداره! ❌ اشتباه اصل…
❤7👍3
❌ بزرگترین اشتباه در برنامهریزی درسی این نیست که برنامه نداشته باشید! اتفاقاً خیلی از دانشجوها برنامه دارن؛ اما یک اشتباه مهم مرتکب میشن: ⏰ برای “مطالعه کردن” برنامه میریزن، اما برای “یاد گرفتن” نه! مثلاً مینویسن: ۱- ساعت ۸ تا ۱۰ بیومکانیک ۲- ساعت ۱۰ تا ۱۲ الکتروتراپی اما یک سؤال مهم: 🤔 از کجا معلوم بعد از این دو ساعت واقعاً چیزی یاد گرفتی؟ واقعیت ایه که مغز ما با “ساعت درس خواندن” یاد نمیگیره. 🧠 مغز زم…
❤20
🔊 پادکست “کاملگرایی در برنامهریزی” در این پادکست درمورد مثال عملی کاملگرایی در برنامهریزی (درسی/غیردرسی) صحبت کردهام. 🔴 مراقب تلهای باشید که میتونه مدتها باعث بشه درجا بزنید. 🔹 کانال تلگرام: @hejazipt
❤5
⚠️ کاملگرایی یا Perfectionism، راهکاری برای شکستخوردن در هر برنامهریزی! 📌 همه میدونیم که کاملگرایی ریشه در ضعفهای ما از جمله استرس و ترس داره. 📌 متاسفانه سیستم آموزشی ما هنر خیلی زیادی در ساختن آدمهای کاملگرا داره؛ ویژگیای که اگر در خودمون کنترلش نکنیم، پیشرفتهای ما به طور جدی محدود میشه. 📌 فرد کاملگرا درحدی برای اهداف خودش خطرناکه که حاضره کلا کاری نکنه تا این که کاری بکنه و نقص داشته باشه. 🔊 منتظر پا…
❤7
سهیل حجازی | کنکور DPT و ارشد pinned an audio file
🔊 پادکست سوالات رایج 🔴 تداخل کنکور امسال با طرح و سربازی؟ ✅ در این پادکست به پاسخ این دغدغه مهم پرداختهام 🔹 پیوستن به کانال تلگرام: @hejazipt
❤4🙏1
🎙️ پادکست نکات کلیدی جهت آمادگی برای وبینار "استراتژی قبولی در کنکور DPT و ارشد آبان ١۴٠۵" ⚠️ گوش دادن به این پادکست قبل از شرکت در وبینار الزامیست! 💎با حضور فیزیوتراپیست دکتر سهیل حجازی یکتا ، رتبه ٢ دکتری تخصصی فیزیوتراپی 📆 تاریخ وبینار: جمعه ٨ خرداد ماه، ساعت: ۲۰ در بستر اسکای روم ⚠️ ظرفیت وبینار با توجه به نکات، اهمیت و کیفیت برگزاری محدوده! ✅ داوطلبان آزمون DPT و ارشد ١۴٠۵، هر چه زودتر از طریق زیر ثبت نام ک…
#کنکور_DPT 👨🏻💻 وبینار "استراتژی قبولی در کنکور DPT و ارشد آبان ١۴٠۵" ⚠️ مهمترین وبینار سال 💎با حضور فیزیوتراپیست دکتر سهیل حجازی یکتا ، رتبه ٢ دکتری تخصصی فیزیوتراپی 📆 تاریخ: جمعه ٨ خرداد ماه، ساعت: ۲۰ در بستر اسکای روم 📚 سرفصلهای وبینار: 1️⃣ تحلیل شرایط جدید کنکور 2️⃣ چرا اکثر داوطلب ها در بازههای طولانی فرسوده میشوند؟ 3️⃣ ویژگیهای کلیدی داوطلب هایی که در کنکور آبان موفق میشوند 4️⃣ استراتژی مطالعه تا آبان…
تعویق کنکور برای بعضیها فرصت میشه؛ و برای بعضیها شروع فرسودگی. واقعیت اینه که فاصله بیشتر تا آزمون، لزوماً به معنی مطالعه بهتر نیست… 👇 لینک عضویت در کانال بله: ble.ir/join/3BZWDxyjBP
تعویق ۵ ماهه کنکور DPT و ارشد. تهدید یا فرصت؟
🔵 براساس اعلام وزارتبهداشت، پذیرش در مقطع DPT از طریق آزمون کارشناسیارشد انجام خواهد شد. بنابراین برخلاف دوسال اخیر، دو کنکور برای ارشد و DPT وجود نخواهد داشت.
👍4❤1
✨ویدیوی یوتوب کامل جلسه دوم CBL: https://youtu.be/7NeP6LIxC6g?si=B_BBhdLw30WPbRrp
🙏10❤4😍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hejazipt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 947,298 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@hejazipt named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سهیل حجازی | کنکور DPT و ارشد” (@hejazipt), 1,278 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hejazipt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.