4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,881–1,913 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 02:48
1,909
+4
10 Aug 2026, 13:33
1,905
+18
7 Aug 2026, 11:10
1,887
+2
7 Aug 2026, 00:33
1,885
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 29 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
294 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
195
66.3%
👍
58
19.7%
custom 5859553070806998013
26
8.84%
👀
8
2.72%
🔥
6
2.04%
⚡
1
0.34%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 294reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 18 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hedgio_fa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 May 2026 to 11 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
اثر انگشت دیجیتال - خوان دوم 🤺
🚨🚨🚨
اثرانگشت یا Fingerprint در دنیای تکنولوژی به مجموعهای از ویژگیهای دستگاه یا مرورگر اطلاق میشه که وقتی کنار هم قرار میگیرن، میتونن یک کاربر رو با احتمال بالا قابل شناسایی کنن.
مواردی مثل رزولوشن نمایشگر، تایمزون دستگاه، ورژن مرورگر، سیستمعامل، حتی فونتهای نصبشده و تعداد هستههای پردازشگر شما برخی از عواملی هستند که میتونن با تقریب خوبی کاربرها رو از هم متمایز یا سیگنال مشت…
کممممکککککک! :)))
دکمهی خاموشکردن هوش مصنوعی و رباتها کجاشونه؟ هرروز دارن زندگی رو برای ما آدما سختتر میکنن.
باید یه پتیشن راهاندازی کنیم و توش بهصورت جدی خواهان توقف رشد این پدیدههای غیرقابل مهار بشیم.
Just Kidding 😁
راستی ممنون بابت شرکتکردن توی نظرسنجی (همین الان گرفتن ورودیهای جدید رو روی نظرسنجی غیرفعال کردیم)!
نتایج نشون میده که فصل دوم رو احتمالا باید با «دنیای ایجنتیک نو» شروع کنیم. میبینیمتون ب…
برای شروع فصل دوم هجیو، شما کدوم رو ترجیح میدید؟ 💚
در ستایش سکوت؛ آیا در کریپتو درونگراها جایی دارند؟ (با اقتباس از کتاب سکوت - قدرت درونگراها) 📞46%
حقوق، مالکیت و کریپتو در آنسوی غیرمتمرکز بودن؛ از بن شدن در رابط کاربری تا فریز شدن داراییها. ⚖️38%
دنیای ایجنتیک نو؛ وقتی هوش مصنوعی از یک چتبات به یک همکار تبدیل شد. 🧠50%
The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
با همکاری چندتا از بچههای خوب کامیونیتی فارسی، سعی کردیم یه لیستی از همه کانالهایی که باکیفیت هستن و هنوز توی این فضا فعالن رو یکجا توی یک فولدر در اختیارتون بذاریم.
https://t.me/addlist/vZyHv6OuUN5iNTY0
هشدار بسیار مهم 🚨
کانالی که ادعا میکرد پشتیبانهای فارسی Coinex هستند، پس از ارسال اطلاعیهای از طرف تیم کوینکس که در اون به آپدیت محدودسازی خدمات برای برخی کشورها اشاره شده، اطلاعات کانال رو به کلی عوض کرده و اسم و تصویر کانال رو عوض کرد.
در این لحظه ارتباط رسمی این کانال با تیم کوینکس زیر سوال هست و در بهترین حالت میشه اونها رو صرفاً نمایندگان غیررسمی فارسیزبان کوینکس در گذشته دونست.
https://t.me/CryptoScopeXC…
یه وقتهایی شما بهصورت اتفاقی چیزهایی رو پیدا میکنی که حکم گنجینههای پنهانشده توی خاک رو دارن.
داشتم دنبال یه کتابی درمورد ریاضیات رمزنگاری میگشتم، دیدم این خانم از سالها پیش یه مخزن درست کرده و اسمش رو گذاشته کتابخونه. کتاب رو توی فولدر cryptography & mathematics پیدا کردم:
https://github.com/isislovecruft/library--
جالبه که خودشون هم دو-سه سالی هست دیگه هیچ فعالیتی روی گیتهابشون نداشتن.
یهچیزی در حدود ۲ گ…
«وقتی دنیا در حال پیشرفت بود، ما کجا بودیم؟»
از سری هجیوپاد (اسمش دیگه هجیوفان نیست، چون مدتی میشه که دیگه هیچچیزی فان نیست برای ما).
بعد از مدتها میخوایم توی یک جلسهی زنده در خدمت شما باشیم و از تمام مسائل روز که این مدت اتفاق افتاده حرف بزنیم!
یکی از مهمترین مباحثی هم که بررسیش میکنیم، بحث «مدیریت رویکرد در نگهداری داراییهای رمزارزی برای ایرانیها»ست، که با توجه به خبرهای مختلفی که به گوش همهمون رسیده باید…
خود ماجرا به خودی خود، خیلی عجیب بهنظر میرسه،
ایده اینه که ممکنه قدرت یکی از این هوشهای مصنوعی از کنترل خارج بشه و توان مقابله باهاش وجود نداشته باشه. تازه ما داریم درمورد مدلهایی حرف میزنیم که در دسترس عموم قرار میگیرن. از طرفی روی فیبل از همون ابتدا یکسری محدودیتهایی در زمینههایی مثل بیولوژی و سایبر اعمال شده بود.
اینوسط اما رفتار انتروپیک هم جالب بود. دسترسی فیبل رو برای تمام کاربرانش بست و استثنایی در…
اولین بودن لزوماً بهترین بودن رو در پی نداره، همونطور که متامسک دیگه امروز پادشاه محسوب نمیشه.
خیلی یهویی برام سوال شده بود که «والت Rabby از چه RPCهایی بهعنوان پیشفرض در شبکههای مختلف استفاده میکنه؟». 🐇
خب از توی خود اکستنشن بخشی وجود نداشت برای دیدنش. فقط شما میتونی اگر دوست داشته باشی Custom RPC خودت رو، مثلاً اگر از هرجایی گرفتی یا خریدی، اضافه کنی بهش.
خیلی عجیب بود که همچینچیز سادهای چرا توش نیست، که …
یکی از اعضای کامیونیتی توی توییتر ادعا کردن که بعد از فریز شدن تتر یک یوزر معمولی ایرانی، از شرکت حقوقی-کریپتوییشون درخواست کمک کردن، که در نهایت مساله با مراجعه به یک شعبه از بنیاد تتر در استانبول حل شده و آدرس از لیست سیاه تتر خارج شده.
برای راستی آزمایی موارد زیر رو بررسی میکنیم:
• آیا این آدرس واقعاً از فریز خارج شده است؟
• بله. طبق لیستی که در پست پیش هم فرستادیم، آدرس در تاریخ ۱۴ می، طی این تراکنش از لیست س…
❤16👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @hedgio_fa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
برای شروع فصل دوم هجیو، شما کدوم رو ترجیح میدید؟ 💚
در ستایش سکوت؛ آیا در کریپتو درونگراها جایی دارند؟ (با اقتباس از کتاب سکوت - قدرت درونگراها) 📞46%
حقوق، مالکیت و کریپتو در آنسوی غیرمتمرکز بودن؛ از بن شدن در رابط کاربری تا فریز شدن داراییها. ⚖️38%
دنیای ایجنتیک نو؛ وقتی هوش مصنوعی از یک چتبات به یک همکار تبدیل شد. 🧠50%
The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 11 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 131,235 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@hedgio_fa named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@cryptoscopexchannel named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پادکست هجیو 🎧” (@hedgio_fa), 1,909 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hedgio_fa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.