за последнюю неделю написало много коллег по цеху с вопросиксами и просьбами ну не могу я отказывать, стараюсь помогать чем могу, но парни подкиньте тоже что нибудь а то мы сидим в песочнице я делюсь с вами своими игрушками, а вы со мной ничем не делитесь. если я не прошу ваши игрушки - это не значит что я не хочу поиграть пасиба рекомендую с обновленным гайдом по метеоре от лекса ознакомиться https://teletype.i…

Channel
HEDGERS
@hedgers_main
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,877subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002179719149 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hedgers_main |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hedgers_main |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 1,877 | +4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 1,873 | +7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:36 | 1,866 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 1,865 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 1,864 | -11 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 1,875 | +13 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 1,862 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 1,869 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 1,869 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 31.3%
- avg views ÷ 1,877 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 588
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 July 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 588 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
И ВСЕ ЕЩЕ НЕ ПРАЙМ я не пытаюсь флексить (ну мож чуть чуть), я приглашаю к сотрудничеству! хз сколько продлится раздача, желательно поторопиться, это факт хедж акки, акки на которые вернули 0 фис, олд акки с активностью (эти живут плохо) - вэлкам я выкручу и 20 и 30 в минуту, но в канал больше не закину, думаю хватит как раздача закончится - отпишу @srzlyy
сказал - сделал а когда не делали с таймингом делаю скрины чтобы было видно что это не рандом, а то иногда запускаешь и там за 30 секнуд +100 в минуту рисует, что не является валидной инфой
чуть ошибся с таймингами подняли серваки, обновили конфиги, завтра еще докручу до 10+ в минуту с вас акки с меня деньги писать сами знаете куда @srzlyy
какая то камбрия дает эирдроп за активность на полике, на хл и за тренчи проверьте у меня много лудокошей, щас все буду просматривать, мейн вот на скрине хз сколько это в деньгах, милион долларов наверное, может пять даже, а то и все 20
видос на ютюб уронил по карте от пионекс думаю шарите за карты и так, поэтому без ссылки на видос тут. карта топ, 13к уже потратил, 0 нареканий если надо ссылка вот хотел бы еще другие попробовать, но лень заморачиваться с кусом, а тут на любые доки нашинские
ближе к вечеру всем отвечу, всех вижу
БЕРЕМ БИНГХ МИНУСОВЫЕ АККИ @srzlyy мне оч не нравится эта биржа, хз зачем люди на ней торгуют, но вынести пару сотен тыщ почему бы и нет принт говна, по сравнению с мексом, но это специфика биржи, ничего не поделать. тем не менее заработать дают
😍 Сижка за неделю: 28 обновлений (ого) Много что сделали, много чего переработали, много чего в планах. Пока такие изменения: 🛡 Наши стопы теперь живут ПРЯМО НА БИРЖЕ Раньше сл исполнял наш сервер. Теперь на каждую новую сделку Сижка ставит нативные TP/SL-ордера прямо на matching engine Hyperliquid. Что это значит: даже если наш бэкенд упадёт, потеряет связь или попадёт под rate-limit, ваша позиция всё равно защищ…
разница между коллом и профитом одна ночь
https://spottrench.xyz/ru/stocks/minimax/prediction/
норм точка входа
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hedgers_main. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 183,494 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HEDGERS” (@hedgers_main), 1,877 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hedgers_main.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.