Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Medical & Health Memes 🌲🐸🌲

Channel

Medical & Health Memes 🌲🐸🌲

@healthmemes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

430subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001355948022
TypeChannel
Username@healthmemes
Created16 April 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/healthmemes

Growth

429430429.57 August 2026 — 429 subscribers7 August 2026 — 429 subscribers14 August 2026 — 430 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 429–430 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 00:56430+1
7 Aug 2026, 02:01429no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:58429first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
96.5%
avg views ÷ 430 subscribers
Avg views / post
415
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (16 June 20263 August 2026)
Views total2,489
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 02:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 05:22 UTC41 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @contaniments

The real machinery of bone health is cellular, hormonal, and mechanical, not a magic vitamin. The myth that K2 “cements” calcium into bone is a sales tactic, not science. Billions have been made on the back of a story that dissolves under even basic biological scrutiny. https://medicinegirl.substack.com/p/not-a-wham-bam-thank-you-maam-vitamin

28 Jul 2026, 08:09 UTC125 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://bartoll.se/2026/07/fit-mom-gave-herself-colon-cancer/

24 Jul 2026, 11:43 UTC166 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎆 For about ten years, the most trusted face in cigarette advertising was your doctor. In 1946 R. J. Reynolds launched a campaign with a slogan that ran everywhere: more doctors smoke Camels than any other cigarette. The image was always the same. A wise, kindly physician, white coat, stethoscope, the very picture of expertise, having a quiet, reassuring smoke. The message needed no translation. If the doctor smoke

20 Jul 2026, 03:20 UTC≈1,940 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://bartoll.se/2026/07/cholesterol-inheritance-scam/

16 Jul 2026, 10:22 UTC154 viewsread 7 August 2026

🎆 The tallest people on the planet in 1850 had never seen a loaf of bread. They rode the American plains and they lived on buffalo. Franz Boas, the father of American anthropology, measured over a thousand of them across eight tribes, and the figures sat forgotten in an archive until two economists, Steckel and Prince, dug them out and published them in the American Economic Review in 2001. The Cheyenne averaged fi

12 Jul 2026, 03:00 UTC101 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @QbombsPhoto

Evolutionist's greatest secret, is that there has NEVER, NOT ONCE, been an observed genetic mutation that has created and increased brand new information in a living thing (giving a new appendage like wings for example). Mutations are neutral or harmful- always. Even what they claim is brand new is never actually brand new, but the same genetic material mixed up or rearranged. This is not "brand new". They just assum

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @healthmemes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 62,399 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Medical & Health Memes 🌲🐸🌲” (@healthmemes), 430 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/healthmemes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.