Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Healthy Human

Channel

Healthy Human

@healingthebody

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

5,278subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001482446857
TypeChannel
Username@healingthebody
Created31 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/healingthebody

Growth

5,2785,2985,2886 August 2026 — 5,298 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,295 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,286 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,278 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,275–5,301 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:435,278-8
10 Aug 2026, 04:385,286-9
6 Aug 2026, 22:455,295-3
6 Aug 2026, 10:335,298first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.21%
avg views ÷ 5,278 subscribers
Avg views / post
275
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held26 (20 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total7,154
Reactions total118
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 35s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

118 reactions across 21 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4538.1%
👍3126.3%
🔥1411.9%
😁119.32%
😱54.24%
🎉21.69%
👏21.69%
😍21.69%
😎21.69%
🤯21.69%
10.847%
🙏10.847%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC92 viewsread 12 August 2026

People often get offended when diet advice challenges their beliefs. Smart health decisions require putting dogma aside, following common sense, and watching the results. https://www.brighteon.com/e2bbf775-1c34-4c72-8906-b2567eb6e8ea

9 Aug 2026, 22:45 UTC168 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Two things that will kill your body and soul: 1. Pathological lying (pseudologia fantastica). 2. Chronic alcohol use. I have no time for anyone who does either.

👍8

8 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC204 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Most people think drinking water is enough. It isn’t. https://healthyhumanconsulting.substack.com/p/how-to-make-the-most-important-health

👍4

7 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC229 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

If you believe in a Creator but don’t believe your body was created with the ability to heal, it may be time to consider the consequences of living with that contradiction.

👍74

6 Aug 2026, 23:14 UTC247 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

FDA approves first mRNA-based injection against the flu, produced by the pharma giant Moderna. Here’s the side effects from the mFLUSIVA trials: Injection-Site Reactions (Local): • Pain — 65.8% (vs. 29.8% with standard-dose comparator) • Erythema (redness) • Swelling / induration (hardness) • Axillary (underarm) swelling or tenderness on the same side as the injection • Tenderness Systemic Reac

😱5🤯21

6 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC213 viewsread 12 August 2026

Skipping breakfast? Maybe you should reconsider how you start your day… https://www.brighteon.com/b5fdc521-70b9-434e-b2f2-2bc9ece96765

6 Aug 2026, 03:36 UTC302 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Forest fires are out of control locally in Canada, but are also raging in the US, France, Spain, and other countries.

5 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC231 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

No side effects from this medicine, and it tastes delicious. Take that, big pharma…

3👍2🔥2😍2

5 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC206 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

It's absolutely mind blowing to me that people will choose invasive and traumatic diagnostics and procedures that do little to nothing to solve their health problem, because its "covered" by insurance. In the end, you PAY for that way of thinking.

🔥6👍1

4 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC227 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Health is built at home, not in a hospital. Learn how to stay out of the medical system as much as possible. https://www.brighteon.com/0de5d7cb-29b6-4ac8-a420-de0911c728ca

👍2

3 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC230 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Health sciences have advanced exponentially in the last 50 years. So has the number of people diagnosed with disease and on treatment plans. What’s the deal? Perhaps diagnostics are getting better at finding SYMPTOMS (not causes), and treatment plans are getting better at management rather than clearance? That’s a rhetorical question. My life and work are the antithesis of this trend. Follow leaders, not liars.

🎉2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @healingthebody. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTCFinal Results40 voters

How often do you drink alcohol?

  1. Never75%
  2. Once a week5%
  3. Twice a week8%
  4. Three times a week8%
  5. Pretty much daily5%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 370,318 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Healthy Human” (@healingthebody), 5,278 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/healingthebody.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.