Winner @krz777mbv
❤5

Channel
@headofcrypt0
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
18,704subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001243385041 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @headofcrypt0 |
| Description | About Crypto |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/headofcrypt0 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 18,704 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 18,706 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 18,708 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 18,712 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 28 August 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
2,150 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥰 | 298 | 13.9% | |
| 🎉 | 286 | 13.3% | |
| 😁 | 286 | 13.3% | |
| 🤩 | 279 | 13.0% | |
| 👍 | 269 | 12.5% | |
| 🔥 | 251 | 11.7% | |
| 👏 | 246 | 11.4% | |
| ❤ | 235 | 10.9% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,150reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2025 to 3 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @headofcrypt0. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 August 2025 to 3 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Winner @krz777mbv
❤5
Game time — ❤️ won, no 👎. Let’s go. Prize: https://t.me/nft/SnoopDogg-310160 How to win In the comments, roll the Telegram slot machine 🎰 and be the first to hit 777 three times. If nobody hits in 24h, I’ll raffle the gift among everyone who rolled at least once. Drop your first 🎰 below. GLHF! 👇
❤6
Should we add "games 777" to the channel? A subscriber suggested quick quizzes/mini-games. If you’re in, I’ll launch the first one today — free entry, prize: a Telegram gift. Vote with reactions: ❤️ yes · 👎 no Drop quiz ideas in the comments.
❤42
Snagged 3 Pens and 2 Suitcases today. Did you top up Telegram’s treasury too? 👀 When transfers open, I’ll raffle 1 Pen. How to enter: just tap ❤️ under this post.
❤41
Voting results + 🎁 Thanks for jumping in — that was lively. The winner is English. From now on the channel runs in EN. For Russian readers I’ll add short RU summaries under key posts. Congrats to our giveaway winner — @Ega_08! Got a priority topic? Comment one you want me to cover first — and hit 🔔 so you don’t miss it. Results: https://t.me/tggrowbot?start=winners68b5775a40a3cec95b5c23c9
❤4
Telegram is basically a museum in your pocket. Beautiful, yes — risky too. You open the market, grab a Plush Pepe, the feed applauds, the ego purrs. But price here is not moved by “brushstrokes” or stories, it’s scarcity rules — who hits the mint button. Yesterday people fought over marble; today they argue over the floor and the order book’s mood. As long as they believe in the one pressing mint, it flies; once th…
❤5
Vote for the channel language Some friends say Russian performs better on Telegram. Let’s test it. Which language should we use? Every vote counts. To get everyone involved, my friends suggested a raffle — so here it is: https://t.me/nft/FlyingBroom-19313 Rules: 1. vote in the poll 2. leave a comment with your choice and why 3. in 48 hours I’ll pick a random winner and send the gift *****************************…
Vote for the channel language
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2
Everyone flexes wins — I’ll show the other side. Been there? Guess the token. First correct answer gets USDT. Drop your wallet 👇
🎁 Started Gifts Giveaway! Details: Subscribe: @headofcrypt0 Deadline: 03.09.2025 13:10 UTC Rewards: Lol Pop #68455, Lol Pop #288154, Lol Pop #357731, Lol Pop #357732, Lol Pop #305468, Lol Pop #176542, Lol Pop #165145, Lol Pop #18306, Lol Pop #31068, Lol Pop #22809, Lol Pop #240648, Lol Pop #35595, Lol Pop #262750, Lol Pop #246854, Lol Pop #151595, Lol Pop #305541, Lol Pop #387512, Lol Pop #401555, Lol Pop #142125, L…
❤129
Over the years in crypto I’ve learned a simple truth: a token only really lives when it moves in lockstep with the product. When a share of profits funds buybacks, the price starts to track the P&L. When burns are tied to real, in-product events, scarcity comes from usage — not from pitch decks. This pairing doesn’t create miracles; it enforces discipline. The noise fades: projects where the token is just décor fall…
🤩58👍56👏56🎉44🔥43🥰42😁42❤1
🛫GM and welcome This channel is crypto without hopium. Product-first takes, real token mechanics, real risks. Built to be actionable tomorrow morning. what to expect: • snackable breakdowns: supply, liquidity, incentives, price action • cases across ecosystems: L1/L2, DeFi, CEX, games/consumer • saveable checklists and tables • anti-cases: what breaks and why what you won’t see: • buy/sell signals, chart spam • fl…
🥰256😁244🎉242🤩221👍213🔥208👏190
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @headofcrypt0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Vote for the channel language
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2025 to 3 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 425,336 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Head of Crypto” (@headofcrypt0), 18,704 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/headofcrypt0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.