50%的已读用户点赞,还是可以持续运营下。 几个标准: 1. 高质量,有价值,原创内容 2. 前期不追求频率,但是不低于一周一次
🥴5

Channel
@hcc_1010
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
166subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001531413401 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hcc_1010 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 9 October 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hcc_1010 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 15:42 | 166 | -2 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 10:18 | 168 | -4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 172 | -2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 174 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:29 | 175 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 177 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:19 | 177 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 October 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
51 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 36 | 70.6% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 9.80% | |
| 🥴 | 5 | 9.80% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 3.92% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.96% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.96% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.96% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2022 to 5 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
50%的已读用户点赞,还是可以持续运营下。 几个标准: 1. 高质量,有价值,原创内容 2. 前期不追求频率,但是不低于一周一次
🥴5
做个调查, 有多少人看这个频道,准备捡起来好好运营下 干货内容。 有看到的朋友点个赞,我统计下一周的周活。
👍30❤2
#Read&links https://x.com/HotmailfromSH/status/1820307673495302534
👍1
#独立开发者推荐 https://andyroamer.com/ 百度产品经理离职
厚着脸皮推荐下 个Twitter: https://twitter.com/polandeme 今年会重点在Twitter 和Telegram上分享优质内容
👍2
#好物分享 1、 RSS + AI的工具: https://www.sumability.com/ 2、全球科技公司博客:https://www.luxiangdong.com/2023/07/20/techblog/ 3、博客文章:OpenAI CEO分享关于高效工作 https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity
🎉1
程序员延寿指南。 https://github.com/geekan/HowToLiveLonger
👍2
NAT穿透的原理的一篇文章 https://arthurchiao.art/blog/how-nat-traversal-works-zh/ 英文原稿:https://tailscale.com/blog/how-nat-traversal-works/
👏3
https://www.jntrnr.com/why-i-left-rust/ rust 这两年越来越火热,这篇来自HN的热门文章,讲了一些不一样的观点
🤔1
https://gfw.report/publications/usenixsecurity23/zh/ 挺有意思的一篇文章,GFW探测加密后的流量,然后进行拦截
🔥1
Channel photo updated
今天听人讲冥想,什么都说服不了我,而这个前 20 分钟就讲明白了“进阶”,而且只用三两句 https://www.xiaoyuzhoufm.com/episode/60d96ed325da4f997b8ba5c3 from Twitter @小鱼(sofish)
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hcc_1010. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“后厂村十点” (@hcc_1010), 166 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hcc_1010.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.