Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝟷𝟸𝙳

Channel

𝟷𝟸𝙳

@hbelj

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,404subscribers

+405 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003165839298
TypeChannel
Username@hbelj
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded29 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hbelj

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,9995,4045,201.529 August 2026 — 4,999 subscribers29 August 2026 — 4,999 subscribers1 September 2026 — 5,054 subscribers4 September 2026 — 5,121 subscribers9 September 2026 — 5,239 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,279 subscribers17 September 2026 — 5,404 subscribers29 August 202617 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 19 days, net +405. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,938–5,465 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 04:405,404+125
13 Sept 2026, 09:565,279+40
9 Sept 2026, 20:165,239+118
4 Sept 2026, 03:565,121+67
1 Sept 2026, 03:555,054+55
29 Aug 2026, 13:044,999no change
29 Aug 2026, 12:454,999first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.14%
avg views ÷ 5,404 subscribers
Avg views / post
224
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held20 (12 July 202627 August 2026)
Views total671
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 01:08 UTC226 viewsread 29 August 2026
File

You remind me of my mom You make me feel like God And I'm watchin' you fall from above There's something 'bout you, baby There's something 'bout the way ya

27 Aug 2026, 01:07 UTC222 viewsread 29 August 2026

Meeting you was like listening to a song for the first time and knowing it would be my favorite.

12 Aug 2026, 00:29 UTC≈2,260 viewsread 29 August 2026

Everyone else says “There are plenty of people like you ” but The Neighbourhood says "I never knew somebody like you"

9 Aug 2026, 22:21 UTC≈2,200 viewsread 29 August 2026

It's not about you. People's actions are a reflection of themselves- not of you. When someone disrespects you, ignores you, or disappoints you, it doesn't define your worth. It speaks more about where they are in life, what they're struggling with, or what they've been through. Most of the time, people react from their own pain, fears, or confusion. You just happen to be standing in the path of whatever they're carry

9 Aug 2026, 22:21 UTC≈2,430 viewsread 29 August 2026
File

When our children ask us how did we meet I'm tellin' them, "Gen Z love, FYP love, IG love" Saw her on the Explore Page, like, I need to explore deeper Suggested accounts said that we got mutuals But you don't fuck with them, me neither When I'm with you, I get baby fever I met your mum on the FYP We're young and our love's Gen Z Mum said that it ain't gon' last I'm tellin' her, "We gon' see" They say our relationship

2 Aug 2026, 20:51 UTC≈2,070 viewsread 29 August 2026

🌻But when night falls, they turn to face eachother, finding light in one another.

2 Aug 2026, 20:51 UTC≈2,880 viewsread 29 August 2026
File

I find you in the dark In the in-between, the silence of it all I don't wanna leave 'cause I know you'll be gone My reality is something that it's not Oh I can love you 'til I'm wide awake I can feel you from miles away

25 Jul 2026, 20:40 UTC≈2,680 viewsread 29 August 2026
File

But I'm into it, I'm into it Say she wanna fuck me later Girl, I'm into it, I'm into it, I'm into it This mental pressure got me popping pills and shit Uh, but I'm into it, I'm into it I'm getting way too deep I'm fucking into it I'm into it, yeah I'm into it I wouldn't change it for the world I'm fucking into it

25 Jul 2026, 20:40 UTC≈2,370 viewsread 29 August 2026

I fell in love with you without touching your skin. It was the way you spoke. The way you looked at the world. The way your words felt like they were meant for me. I learned your heart before I held your hand. I felt you before I ever touched you. It wasn't about your body. It was your soul reaching mine. And somehow, that was more intimate than anything else could be.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hbelj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝟷𝟸𝙳” (@hbelj), 5,404 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hbelj.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.