Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for هەواڵی بەپەلە

Channel

هەواڵی بەپەلە

@hawalibabala

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,344subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 19 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003339128711
TypeChannel
Username@hawalibabala
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded19 September 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/hawalibabala

Growth

2,34419 Sept 2026, 13:47 — 2,344 subscribers19 Sept 2026, 14:22 — 2,344 subscribers19 Sept 2026, 13:4719 Sept 2026, 14:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,342–2,346 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 14:222,344no change
19 Sept 2026, 13:472,344first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.4%
avg views ÷ 2,344 subscribers
Avg views / post
878
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.968%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026
Posts held20 (8 September 202619 September 2026)
Views total17,556
Reactions total170
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
39
Videos
61

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
7m 28s
Average length
1m 30s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

170 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8449.4%
👏2514.7%
👍1911.2%
😁158.82%
👎127.06%
💩42.35%
🔥42.35%
😢31.76%
😱21.18%
🌚10.588%
🤔10.588%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 170 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Sept 2026, 08:22 UTC436 views11 reactionsread 19 September 2026

بەپەلە؛ لە بۆرسەی بەغدا 100 دۆلاری 160 هەزاری تێپەڕاند .....

8👎3

15 Sept 2026, 21:29 UTC897 views10 reactionsread 19 September 2026

حوکمەت پێک نایەت ئەوەی بڵاو کراواتەوە دوورە لەڕاستییەوە سەرچاوەیەکی تایبەت وای پێووتم

6👏4

15 Sept 2026, 21:28 UTC906 views7 reactionsread 19 September 2026

چوار کەسایەتی بەناوبانگی سۆشیالمیدیا لە دهۆک کە دوو کچ و دوو پیاون بە تۆمەتی خراپ بەکارهێنانی سۆشیالمیدیا دەستگیرکران

👍42😱1

15 Sept 2026, 20:56 UTC926 views8 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😢32👍2💩1

15 Sept 2026, 20:39 UTC789 views8 reactionsread 19 September 2026

دەنگۆ موشەک لە ئێران هەڵدراوە بە ئاراستەی هەولێر

6👏1😱1

15 Sept 2026, 20:29 UTC759 views8 reactionsread 19 September 2026

ئێران بۆ ماوەی٧٢ کاتژمیر سەرجەم هیزە سەربازیەکانی خستە ئەوپەری ئامادەباشیەوە

😁43👏1

15 Sept 2026, 19:43 UTC743 views7 reactionsread 19 September 2026

دواخستنی دەستپێکردنی ساڵی خوێندن بۆ 10/11 بەڕێکەوت نییە... عێراق بەرەو ڕاگەیاندنی باری نائاسایی وسەپاندنی یاسای سەربازی دەڕوات. ٩/٣٠ رێککەوتێکی یەکلاکەرەوەیە بۆ داهاتووی عێراق وحکومەتەکەی زەیدی.

5👍1👏1

15 Sept 2026, 17:54 UTC778 views7 reactionsread 19 September 2026

میدیاکان سێیەم ئاماژەی دەسپیکردنی جەنگی جیهانی سییەم رویدا کەشتیەکی سەربازی روسیا روبەروی هەلیکۆپتەریکی دانیمارک بویەوە

3👍3👏1

14 Sept 2026, 20:38 UTC710 views7 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

هونەرمەندی میللی نوری گەرمیانی لە هەولێر دەستگیرکرا.

4👍2😁1

13 Sept 2026, 20:27 UTC741 views10 reactionsread 19 September 2026

بوومەلەرزەیەکی سیاسی بەڕێوەیە.!

8🤔1😁1

13 Sept 2026, 09:45 UTC791 views10 reactionsread 19 September 2026

بەپەلە... عێراق 500 ملیار دینار لە شایستەی جوتیارانی خەرج کرد وەزارەتی دارایی عێراق 500 ملیار دینار لە شایستەی جوتیارانی بۆ مانگی ئەیلول خەرج کرد

6👏4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hawalibabala. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“هەواڵی بەپەلە” (@hawalibabala), 2,344 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hawalibabala.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.