Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Алекс Хавард

Channel

Алекс Хавард

@havard_alex

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

388subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 28 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001465440093
TypeChannel
Username@havard_alex
Created14 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded28 September 2026
Last confirmed live21 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/havard_alex

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (qwen3.6:35b-a3b, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

38638838728 September 2026 — 387 subscribers28 September 2026 — 387 subscribers4 October 2026 — 386 subscribers21 October 2026 — 388 subscribers28 September 202621 October 2026
4 measurements spanning 23 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 386–388 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Oct 2026, 01:57388+2
4 Oct 2026, 21:59386-1
28 Sept 2026, 09:22387no change
28 Sept 2026, 08:47387first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

65 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3249.2%
❤1624.6%
👍1218.5%
👏46.15%
🤔11.54%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC250 views8 reactionsread 28 September 2026

Так сам Тиль – Антихрист? Это не риторический вопрос. Создавая самые мощные системы контроля над населением в истории, он прислуживает настоящему Антихристу – тому, кто правит душами, – а не выдуманному, который будто бы управляет ИИ. Он выводит на сцену фальшивый тоталитаризм, чтобы сделать реальный приемлемым. В пророческом тексте Владимира Соловьева «Краткая повесть об Антихристе» (закончена на Пасху 1900 года – и…

👍5❤2🤔1

25 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC207 views5 reactionsread 28 September 2026

ПИТЕР ТИЛЬ – ЭТО АНТИХРИСТ? Сегодня главные ИИ-системы Запада работают на две конторы. С одной стороны – технолибертарианство, с другой – технополицейщина. На первый взгляд, они друг другу враги. На деле – близнецы-братья. Почему? Потому что у них один фундамент: одно и то же представление о человеке, одна и та же материалистическая антропология. Для технолибертарианца человек – это просто набор потребительских хоте…

👍3❤2

25 Jun 2026, 06:02 UTC279 views7 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Forwarded from @ViaD0lorosaPhoto

Состоялась вторая встреча в нашем дискуссионном клубе. Делюсь моим диалогом с антропологом и писателем Алексом Хавардом. Конечно, это только начало разговора о Темном повороте. Нам в нем жить. Это только введение в тему. Дискуссия в запись не вошла. Это только для участников).

🔥7

25 Jun 2026, 06:02 UTC238 viewsread 28 September 2026
Forwarded from @ViaD0lorosaFile

File, posted without a caption

24 Jun 2026, 12:14 UTC274 viewsread 28 September 2026

https://www.ridus.ru/kuda-vseh-nas-zavedet-temnyj-povorot-sovremennoj-istorii-878725.html

22 Jun 2026, 12:57 UTC265 views2 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Forwarded from @ViaD0lorosa

Напоминаю, друзья, что уже послезавтра у нас с вами актуальный и парадоксальный разговор. О том, как "Просвещение" с фатальной неизбежностью привело нас к "Тёмному повороту", но сам он отнюдь не ведет с железной предопределенностью в бездну. Может и вывести к Свету. И кстати, о том, в какой степени можно считать Трампа "богом Хаоса"... https://basmannyy-forum.timepad.ru/event/4032982/

❤1👍1

15 Jun 2026, 09:12 UTC325 views4 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Forwarded from @ViaD0lorosa

Жду вас, друзья на следующей встрече нашего интеллектуального клуба. Поговорим о том, чего не видят и не понимают в действиях Трампа большинство комментаторов. Как с его личностью связан "тёмный поворот" в философии, и можно ли найти ориентиры в мировом хаосе, который у нас на глазах сменяет то, что вы считали "миропорядком". https://basmannyy-forum.timepad.ru/event/4032982/

🔥4

4 Jun 2026, 12:43 UTC419 views14 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

Сан-Паулу. Передо мной — профессор ISE Business School. За его плечами — годы преподавания. Моя задача — показать ему новое: Virtuous Leadership. Это магия: учить того, кто учит других. Благодарю за этот вызов и доверие.

🔥10👍3❤1

29 May 2026, 08:58 UTC403 views12 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Forwarded from @ViaD0lorosaPhoto

Состоялась первая встреча нашего интеллектуального клуба, на которой антрополог и писатель Алекс Хавард и я, при активном соучастии откликнувшихся обсудили Питера Тиля и антихриста. Знаковым стало нежданное обстоятельство - папа Римский Лев XIV буквально за несколько дней до нашей встречи выпустил первую свою энциклику, также посвященную теме ИИ. То есть мы полностью совпали по ощущению главной тревоги. А значит, обя…

❤10👏2

28 May 2026, 12:40 UTC282 views8 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

Пальма-де-Майорка, Radio Baleares. Интервью, которое не хотелось заканчивать. Абсолютно удивительные, теплые люди — спасибо за этот свет и энергетику! https://open.spotify.com/episode/4QkR26sLTizUKaiXUXTXea?si=OKTblxL1S3GacE3xx67aVw&nd=1&dlsi=a92e70ac331f4973

🔥7👏1

26 May 2026, 17:58 UTC266 views5 reactionsread 28 September 2026

Париж, 15-го апреля, ИНТЕРВЬЮ о крахе Проекта Просвещения, для тех, кто понимает по-французски. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euQmHoL8Vpg

🔥4👏1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @havard_alex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ГУВМ Новости
@ufmsmsk · 20,249
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Алекс Хавард” (@havard_alex), 388 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/havard_alex.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.