Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

hhaty.cryptonoob

@hatahhaty

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

26subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002261301269
TypeChannel
Username@hatahhaty
Descriptionmoney for fun Обязательно к прочтению: https://teletype.in/@hatahhaty/DXj8TmnWZOF
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 3 February 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/hatahhaty

Growth

267 August 2026 — 26 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25–27 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 08:4626no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:2826first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 3 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
43
Videos
5
Links
17

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

33 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5190867898800821266721.2%
custom 5296525713485089826618.2%
🌭618.2%
🍌515.2%
🐳515.2%
custom 5192857499451021759412.1%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 February 2025 to 23 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hatahhaty. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 February 2025 to 23 February 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Feb 2025, 21:39 UTC360 viewsread 11 August 2026

😐 Рубрика: «Короче выводы». 1️⃣ Люди которые зашли в подарки первыми (в октябре), будут в больших плюсах, потому что заходили ради коллекций, а не заработка, они ничего не продавали и не продают, цены на их (старые) подарки высокие и будут расти. ⏰ Люди, которые пришли после «ТикТок» хайпа, надеются заработать, но уже не получится, потому что они сами же и убивают рынок своими ценами (они согласны даже на прибыль в

21 Feb 2025, 00:42 UTC287 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Отныне известен под двумя юзернеймами в телеграмм: @hhatyy (основной) @vkpoo (ВК-какашка) - это все знают, это всем понятно, поэтому меня никто и никогда не потеряет.

17 Feb 2025, 19:33 UTC269 viewsread 11 August 2026

А стоит покупать то ? 🤔 А может стоит купить это ? 🫤 А как думаешь, сколько это будет стоить ? 🧐 🤔 Отвечаю, но мега субъективно. Покупая НФТ вы как бы вкладываетесь во что-то на свой страх и риск, вообще так-то есть не только тг подарки, а еще много крутых и красивых картинок: getgems.io 🎁 Почему лягушка столько стоит ? - Потому что ее не продает никто. 🪞 Держат ее все и не отдают, от этого коллекционеры предлагаю

17 Feb 2025, 07:48 UTC202 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Новые подарочки слили, слив похож на настоящий: 23 февраля: 🎁 8 марта: 🎁🎁🎁 Все по канону, лайк! 👍

custom 51908678988008212664custom 51928574994510217591custom 52965257134850898261

14 Feb 2025, 15:16 UTC240 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Кто покупает новые подарки, совет Вам. 💲 Когда цена минта доходит до минимальной, не улучшайте, вы уже пропустили дорогие минты, следовательно гнаться за числом подарка уже смысла нет. 🌪 Сначала сразу посмотрите по сколько они торгуются на ОТС или в @Tonnel_Network_bot Если Вас не устраивает цена, то вы можете НЕ улучшенный подарок обменять обратно на звезды в течении 3х месяцев, правда с комиссией 15%, но возможно

14 Feb 2025, 14:48 UTC203 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Короче теперь минт(улучшение) стоит не на все 25⭐️, как раньше, а пропорционально цене подарка, 1/5 от цены. Налог на богатство, как сказал один из моих знакомых: 🎁 Цена сумки 2500 - минт 500 ❤️ Цена зельки 1000 - минт 200 Цена на минт начинается от 25000⭐️ и падает до 1/5 от цены подарка, спустя примерно 6-8 часов. Раньше она падала с 25000⭐️ до 25⭐️ на всех подарках за 12 часов ❓ Некоторые, а именно 2 человека (д

custom 51908678988008212661custom 51928574994510217591custom 52965257134850898261

14 Feb 2025, 13:18 UTC166 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Долго ждать не пришлось, еще новые 🧐

custom 52965257134850898262

14 Feb 2025, 04:36 UTC175 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

По последнему дропу обстановка: 🎁 400 ★ (limited: 50k gifts only) 🎁 1000 ★ (limited: 35k gifts only) 🎁 500 ★ (limited: 60k gifts only) 🎁 1000 ★ (limited: 35k gifts only) 🎁 500 ★ (limited: 40k gifts only) 🎁 200 ★ (limited: 150k gifts only) 🎁 2500 ★ (limited: 15k gifts only) 🎁 300 ★ (limited: 70k gifts only) 🎁 10000 ★ (limited: 2000 gifts only) 🎁 Интересно сколько будет стоить эта ракушка за 10к звезд

14 Feb 2025, 02:25 UTC168 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Новые подарочки вышли Вот такие прикупил Потратил: 5500⭐️ Как спится ? 🤩

custom 51908678988008212662custom 51928574994510217592custom 52965257134850898262

9 Feb 2025, 10:27 UTC309 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

С @whoiml бота смастерили, подарки по запросам ищет У каждого нового пользователя 1 бесплатный запрос, можете потыкать. Там рефка 35%, может заработать кто хочет, порекламьте в ОТС. минимум 7 звезд с одного приглашенного, который что-то купит Вот сам бот: @eyeofgifts_bot Вот канал бота: @eyeofgifts

🌭2🍌2🐳2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @hatahhaty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“hhaty.cryptonoob” (@hatahhaty), 26 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hatahhaty.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.