Такое делаем, если акк хороший 😉 Связь @hvvrsh
👎8🔥2😁2🤣1🥴1

Channel
@hashvers
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,856subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002030647397 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hashvers |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hashvers |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 1,856 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:21 | 1,860 | -16 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:20 | 1,876 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 1,876 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 10 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (10 January 2025 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,221 |
| Reactions total | 24 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
481 reactions across 21 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 119 | 24.7% | |
| 🔥 | 113 | 23.5% | |
| 😁 | 76 | 15.8% | |
| 👍 | 53 | 11.0% | |
| 👏 | 40 | 8.32% | |
| 🤣 | 37 | 7.69% | |
| 🤡 | 11 | 2.29% | |
| 👎 | 10 | 2.08% | |
| 🤮 | 5 | 1.04% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 1.04% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 0.832% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.624% | |
| 🥴 | 3 | 0.624% | |
| 🎄 | 1 | 0.208% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 0.208% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 481reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 10 January 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hashvers. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 January 2025 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Такое делаем, если акк хороший 😉 Связь @hvvrsh
👎8🔥2😁2🤣1🥴1
🤝 НОУ ФОМО ворк по MEXC Последний месяц, он почти не давал никаких профитов, но буквально несколько дней назад он снова восстал как Феникс с пепла, и начал давать отличный принт. Чесно, я не знаю сколько продлится это милосердие от биржи, но прошу вас поспешить пока все работает. Не важно крутили ли вы когда то акк уже или нет, это может быть и второй и третий круг, главное, чтобы была 0 комиссия, и какой-никакой…
😁8🥴2
📈Ахалай-махалай MEXC депчик отдавай Иронично, что постом выше я идеально отколил вам пик бычки, но сам не послушался. Надеюсь хоть кому-то он помог. Написал ультимативный софт по отработке 0-Fee аккаунтов MEXC, или же в народе с минусовым пнл😁 Спустя долгое время шлифовки софта, я готов дать вам возможность сделать открут по приятному проценту в виде 40% от вытянутого Что от вас требуется: 1) Наличие 0-Fee MEXC …
🤮5❤3
А это ещё даже и не бычка!🥸 Проверяю бычка ли это уже по интенсивности выхода постов от Sergey (ICO Drops) Кажется что вот-вот🫣 А чем занимаетесь вы?) Чат лучших криптоигроков - тык
🤣31👍5🔥1🤯1
Video, posted without a caption
😁20🤣5🤓1
🏙Пост анализ TOWNS движений Наконец-то ультимативная эпопея с отработкой этого проекта окончена. Как по мне, в последнее месяцы гемность проекта была сильно накручена фомо движениями, по этому предварительно я не ожидал КЖДН ситуации, и был морально готов к консервативным иксам. Собственно это мы и увидели. Рад что эта история закончилась, т.к. уже устал поддерживать инфраструктуру для активность в проекте. Ультима…
❤34🔥15👏9👍3
🔵Заначка на лето в ПРИБЫЛА, бро! https://stake.b3.fun/ - Забираем вторую половину дропа! Обновил софт, под Клейм и Свап. Можно выбирать по отдельности а можно и все вместе. Минимум +100к$ летней поддержки для юзеров софта Ультимативный клеймер B3 (claim & swap без стеснений) 🫡🫡🫡 Чат лучших криптоигроков - тык Ультимативное обучение BAS - тык
❤11🔥8👏5
❤️ ПРОПАРСИЛ PORTALS - СОБРАЛ СЕБЕ МУНБЕГ Кто еще не в курсе Portals - наиболее ликвидный маркет Телеграм подарков, где можно попробовать собрать себе мунбег, или распродаваться Писал для себя, поделюсь и с вами🤗 Данный парсер поможет вам узнать быстро есть ли нфт на продажу с нужными вам ID в нужной коллекции. Логика работы: Загружаете в IDs.txt список с блатными сочетаниями цифр в id (1111, 2222, ...) Загружает…
🔥8❤4👏1
🎮 Мама я Плиточник Года идут а крипта никак не развивается. Monad2048 уже наверное 5 если не больше 2048 игра в крипте на которую я писал софт. Ну пускай так и продолжают, это нам на руку😁 Получилось не плохо, софт в среднем набивает 20к+ скора и вам не надо играться с консольками и запускать все вручную. Прошу любить и жаловать: MONAD 2048 (Работает плиточником и даже не стесняется) Софт имеет 3 режима окончания…
🔥9🤩3❤2
🔵Заначка на лето в ПОДВАЛЕ, бро! Настало время забирать вторую часть дропа от b3.fun Ну хоть не помрем с голодухи летом, и на этом спасибо рыночку. Unstake сегодня - кушаем через 45 дней👌 Это можно сделать на сайте https://stake.b3.fun/ Либо можете использовать Ультимативный клеймер B3 (unstake без стеснений) 🫡🫡🫡 Чат лучших криптоигроков - тык Ультимативное обучение BAS - тык
❤15🔥7👏3👍2
😈 Вырываемся в экосистему НФТ паПаши Дурова Осенью 24 года в крипто сообществах прошел бурный хайп на первые коллекции подарков, основное чем нам тогда запудрили голову это айтемы, блокчейн и маркет. И многие, как и я прикупили первые коллекци, собственно на этом и все наше взаимодействие было закончено. Недавно я вспомнил про подарки и решил чуть разобраться в этой теме, тем более что недавно запустился мар…
❤6🔥4👎2
💨Спи*дил телефон у брата, получил халявную моб. прокси 👋 Всем, давно не виделись. Мечтали ли вы когда-нибудь о бесплатной мобильной прокси? Вы соврете если скажете что нет! А что если я вам скажу что подготовил для вас статью как получить *бесплатную мобильную прокси? Представлю вашему вниманию: УЛЬТИМАТИВНЫЕ МОБ. ПРОКСИ - БЕСПЛАТНО Инфа созревала давно, руки оформить дошли только сейчас😁 Сделайте свое дело к…
👍21🔥7👏3❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @hashvers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 500,255 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HVRSH on the base | #Vers” (@hashvers), 1,856 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hashvers.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.