Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
65 measurements spanning 101 days, net +343. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,051–12,659 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Nov 2026, 13:36
12,464
-11
11 Nov 2026, 13:06
12,475
-11
9 Nov 2026, 20:38
12,486
-7
8 Nov 2026, 13:59
12,493
-9
7 Nov 2026, 11:07
12,502
-10
6 Nov 2026, 08:56
12,512
-7
5 Nov 2026, 05:38
12,519
-7
4 Nov 2026, 04:07
12,526
-6
3 Nov 2026, 06:39
12,532
-7
2 Nov 2026, 07:10
12,539
-15
1 Nov 2026, 05:19
12,554
-1
31 Oct 2026, 05:56
12,555
-7
30 Oct 2026, 07:05
12,562
-11
29 Oct 2026, 03:31
12,573
-6
27 Oct 2026, 22:19
12,579
+1
26 Oct 2026, 23:20
12,578
+4
25 Oct 2026, 23:56
12,574
-11
24 Oct 2026, 22:27
12,585
-4
23 Oct 2026, 22:48
12,589
+19
23 Oct 2026, 01:38
12,570
first reading
Engagement
203 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.0%
avg views ÷ 12,464 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,740
67 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.144%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
67
of 203 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 49 of 67 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
203 (2 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
116,590
Reactions total
125
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 09:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6m 19s
Average length
2m 06s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
437 reactions across 139 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
274
62.7%
👍
85
19.5%
👀
38
8.70%
👎
17
3.89%
🙏
12
2.75%
👏
11
2.52%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 147 of the 203 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 440 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 203 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 38 of 67 posts held from the last 30 days (56.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔍 در نتیجه نسبت طلا به نقره وضعیت کلی اقتصاد جهانی را نشان میدهد، اما به شما نمیگوید «چه زمانی» دقیقا دست به خرید بزنید. برای تصمیمگیری درست، باید تقاضای صنعتی و وضعیت بازار را همزمان بررسی کرد.
هاشمیان؛ اصالتِ تجربه، خلوصِ نقره، اطمینانِ سرمایه.
🆔️️️️ @hashemiansilverbar
✅ دلیل اصلی ساده است: رفتار این دو فلز در اقتصاد یکسان نیست.
▫️ طلا بیشتر یک دارایی امن و سرمایهای است که با ریسکهای سیاسی، تورم و نرخ بهره جابهجا میشود.
▫️ نقره علاوه بر جنبهی سرمایهگذاری، یک فلز کاربردی در صنعت (انرژی خورشیدی، الکترونیک و ساختوساز) است.
✔️ وقتی این نسبت بالا میرود، لزوما به این معنی نیست که نقره ارزان شده؛ بلکه ممکن است نشاندهندهی رکود در بخش صنعت باشد. در شرایط رکود، تقاضای صنعتی برای…
⁉️ چرا «نسبت طلا به نقره» سیگنال خرید نیست؟
🔻 خیلی از فعالان بازار فکر میکنند وقتی این نسبت بالا میرود، یعنی نقره نسبت به طلا عقب افتاده، ارزان شده و وقت خرید است. اما تکیه بر این فرض میتواند گمراهکننده باشد.
«در صنف ما، اعتبار از جایی ساخته میشود که خریدار کمتجربه هم معامله را بفهمد. توضیح روشن عیار، هزینه و شرایط فروش، احترامی است که باید پیش از دریافت پول به مشتری گذاشت.»
#دانشنامه_هاشمیان
هاشمیان؛ اصالتِ تجربه، خلوصِ نقره، اطمینانِ سرمایه.
🆔️️️️ @hashemiansilverbar
💡 برای تشخیص به موقع آغاز یک روند صعودی، نیاز به بررسی تکتک نشانهها به صورت جداگانه نیست؛ بلکه کافی هست تصویر بازار و همزمانی این سیگنالها را در کنار هم ببینید.
🔖 یادآوری: برای اینکه این پازل تحلیلی همیشه یادتان بماند، حتما چکلیست بالا را ذخیره کنید تا در بررسیهای روزانهتان همراهتان باشد.
👍 هاشمیان؛ اصالتِ تجربه، خلوصِ نقره، اطمینانِ سرمایه.
📱 @hashemiansilverbar
⚡️ امروز قرار هست چکلیست کاربردی دیگری درباره رصد دقیق موجهای صعودی در بازار نقره منتشر کنیم.
⌛ با توجه به اینکه این موضوع یکی از پراهمیتترین مباحث در حوزه سرمایهگذاری فلزات گرانبها است، پیشنهاد میکنیم همراه ما باشید تا سیگنالهای اصلی تغییر فاز بازار را بشناسید.
۳ عامل اصلی افت قیمت طلا و سکه در بازار
🔻 به گزارش خبرگزاری مهر؛ درباره وضعیت بازار طلا و سکه اظهار کرد: از ابتدای هفته جاری بازار طلا و سکه روند کاهشی را تجربه کرده و این کاهش قیمت تحت تأثیر سه عامل اصلی شامل نوسانات و تغییرات قیمت طلا در بازارهای جهانی، کاهش نرخ ارز در بازار غیررسمی و همچنین انتشار اخبار سیاسی و اقتصادی بوده است.
🔹 در شرایط فعلی بازار با التهاب خاصی مواجه نیست و روند نسبتا باثباتی را دنبال میکند…
Showing the 12 most recent of 203 posts we hold for @hashemiansilverbar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@hashemiansilverbar edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
در روزهای اخیر شاهد رشد دلار بودیم، اما طلا و نقره ارزان شدند!
به نظر شما دلیل اصلی این تناقض در بازار چیست؟
فشار اونس جهانی بیشتر از دلار بود.49%
بازار منتظر اتفاقات جدید سیاسی است.43%
حباب بازار در حال تخلیه شدن است.13%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
⁉️ به نظرتون تا پایان مرداد، بازار طلا و سکه چه مسیری رو طی میکنه؟
موج جدید صعودی (رشد قیمتها)44%
نوسان ملایم و درجا زدن45%
اصلاح و کاهش قیمت15%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 203 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 37 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ نقره خام برادران هاشمیان” (@hashemiansilverbar), 12,464 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hashemiansilverbar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.