Channel
@harrypotterbackup
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
22subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001284834987 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @harrypotterbackup |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/harrypotterbackup |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 22 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 23 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 24 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 24 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 23 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Should all Unforgivable Curses casting cases, sentence someone to Azkaban for life? Unforgivable Curses have since the year 1717 carried the highest penalty possible in wizarding Britain. Successfully casting one of the 3 unforgivable curses on another human being, automatically condemns the person to life in Azkaban, without the chance of pardoning or release with parole conditions. While the use of an unforgivab…
Which book would you say is the most informative one? I would say GoF personally, I think it’s from this book we start to see the whole picture of the wizarding world, other magic schools, ministry departments, more wizard world than just Hogwarts. The world view starts from GoF. Love to hear different opinions https://redd.it/1vl4s8b @harrypotterbackup
Deathly Hallows - Dancing Scene I know most people either hate or have strong opinions about the Harry and Hermione dance scene in Deathly Hallows Part 1, and I wanted to share my thoughts on it, as I haven’t read or heard similar opinions. I never say it as a romantic notion or anything like Harry having feelings for Hermione. I’ve always interpreted that scene as Harry attempting to cheer Hermione up. They had b…
Why do you think the fake Moody actually taught his students so many useful things? So in the Goblet of Fire, the Defense Against the Dark Arts Teacher is Professor Moody (who turns out to not actually be Moody). But in the book, it is mentioned and shown that he teaches his students so many useful and important things throughout his year as a teacher. Considering he was an direct ally to Lord Voldemort, why do you …
Take: the reason magic schools do so many dangerous stuff Is because healing is so easy. "People are the most dangerous thing to other people" is especialy true in the Wizarding world. That's also why the hogsmade trip needed parental consent https://redd.it/1vl7wez @harrypotterbackup
Ages of professors I’ve been re reading the half blood prince and been thinking about the ages and the time lines. It is a known thing that Dumbledore is ancient. In the chamber of secrets, it is said that tom riddle was at hogwarts 50 years ago. Hagrid was in his third year when tom caused hagrid to get expelled. This would put him at 63 during the chamber of secrets book happens. 63 isn’t necessarily OLD but he i…
No one bat an eyelid with the Polyjuice potion...why? I am reading the books again, and in CoS, when they make the Polyjuice I have some beef with Rowling. So, Crabbe and Goyle wake up in a cupboard without shoes, and nothing happens? They tell no one? They don't suspect the cakes? I mean they may be stupid, but come on... And Madame Pomfrey isn't suspicious of Hermione arriving with clear signs of a failed Polyju…
Hedwig deserved more Hedwig deserved a better sendoff, girly has been there since the beginning and her death is barely a blip on the screen:( (Movie based opinion) https://redd.it/1vl0wom @harrypotterbackup
Just Finished The Full Cast Audible books. I am so impressed with how fantastically produced Audible did on the Full Cast Recordings. It is entirely a new experience. Having not read the books since they came out, I forgot so many details. Hopefully, HBO can take it to the next level to give everyone a visual experience that matches the audio experience. I can say, I want to see the Battle of Hogwarts and the fina…
How did Dumbledore NOT figure out the chamber of secrets...? things Dumbledore knows, at the time of the book, about the 'situation' with the chamber because he was there the last time \-it was myrtle that died \-she died in that bathroom \-ole Tommy boi was sus at the time \-ole Tommy boi became old voldy \-unconfirmed, but likely all the roosters were getting off'd as well the first time so basically all Dumbled…
Roger Lloyd-Pack's performance as Barty Crouch Sr. The Chinese Firebolt. Ooooooo!!!! It's a bonkers performance. My family and friends always loved to impersonate his weird-ass mannerisms (like that thing he does with his hands when he's announcing the Triwizard Tournament). But I've taken it for granted most of my life and only recently thought about it from an artistic standpoint—and I think it's one full of real…
Do you think Draco's friends addressed him by his first name(Draco) or by last name(Malfoy)? In the seven books, Draco is always seen calling his friends by their last names : “What's up with you, Crabbe?” “You know I haven’t, Goyle.” “So, Zabini.” (He's never seen addressing Pansy Parkinson or Theodore Nott by their names - unless you count the Cursed Child, where he says “Theodore Nott” when mentioning him to Har…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @harrypotterbackup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,580,662 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Harrypotter Subreddit Harry Potter Reddit r/harrypotter Backup by RTP on Telegram” (@harrypotterbackup), 22 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/harrypotterbackup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.