Channel
@haroonsidat
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
146subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 3 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002544220942 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @haroonsidat |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 3 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/haroonsidat |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 19:19 | 146 | +5 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 19:56 | 141 | +1 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 04:22 | 140 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 16 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (16 October 2026 – 1 November 2026) |
| Views total | 4,674 |
| Reactions total | 18 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 04:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
18 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 83.3% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2026 to 1 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (21.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Yesterday afternoon, we studied the history of Pakistan with my friend Mawlana Saleem sb. During the discussion, he reflected on how often we dismiss someone’s entire contribution because of a mistake or two. I mentioned a Persian couplet that captures his concern. There is a story in Saʿdī’s Gulistān in which a king punishes an official who had otherwise served him faithfully. While in prison, the official receives…
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
What If You Don’t Have a Shaykh? Last night, a student asked me, “What should I do if I don’t have access to a shaykh to guide me spiritually?” Mawlānā Ashraf ʿAlī Thānawī (رحمه الله) reminds us first in his Malfūẓāt. مقصودِ سلوک رضائے حق ہے “The purpose of the spiritual path is to attain the pleasure of Allah.” He explains that the path is essentially one. To live by Islam's outward and inward teachings. He then ide…
❤4
Photo, posted without a caption
Read this story from Saʿdī’s Gulistān this evening. We read of a king facing a mortal illness who is told that his cure lies in taking the life of an innocent boy. Of course, the story isn’t true. In any case, we are told that his parents accept the money, the judge approves the killing, and the sacrifice is duly prepared. At that very moment, as his life is about to be taken, he asks them all a question. Where do…
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
*Two Ways of Reading* Last night I skimmed Shaykh Muṣṭafā Aḥmad al-Zarqā’s ʿAqd al-Bayʿ. His presentation merits a brief comment. As you know, in texts like the Hidāyah, for example, we enter through specific questions about transactions. The author presents rulings, disagreements, analogies, and exceptions, and so forth. Shaykh Muṣṭafā takes an alternative approach, classifying contracts by subject matter and legal…
❤1
Forgive my scribbles here. I’ve been reading the introduction to al-Shāṭibī’s al-Muwafaqat and wanted to share something about people who rush to treat maqāṣid as a standalone source of subjective legal preference. Notice that al-Shāṭibī places the discussion of maqāṣid after the treatment of legal rulings, which suggests that understanding the purposes of the law requires familiarity with the structure of its obliga…
👍3
Photo, posted without a caption
The heart is an endowment (waqf) A student from our waqf course shared this. The Qurʾān tells us: ﴿إِنَّ اللَّهَ اشْتَرَىٰ مِنَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ أَنْفُسَهُمْ وَأَمْوَالَهُمْ بِأَنَّ لَهُمُ الْجَنَّةَ﴾ “Indeed, Allah has purchased from the believers their lives and their wealth in exchange for Paradise.” (9:111) But why does Allah mention their lives and wealth, and not their hearts? Shaykh Abū ʿAlī al-Daqqāq (d. 40…
❤3
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @haroonsidat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dr Haroon Sidat” (@haroonsidat), 146 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/haroonsidat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.