Channel
@haromzadehaaaa
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,538subscribers
+1,266 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002253746041 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @haromzadehaaaa |
| Created | Between 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/haromzadehaaaa |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
5,080 average views per post against 3,538 subscribers — an engagement rate of 143.6%. Across the 12,155 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 5.73% and 23.7%, with a median of 12.3%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 15 of 16 published in the window (0 exact, 15 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 76,220 |
| Mature posts only | 204.6% over 8 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 3,538 measured 11 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b3162:fas · 12,155 channels · p10 2.57% · p25 5.73% · p50 12.3% · p75 23.7% · p90 40.5% |
| Position in cohort | 99.301th percentile · 11.7× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.083% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Persian · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:42 | 3,538 | +853 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:20 | 2,685 | +413 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:19 | 2,272 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (1 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 76,220 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
😂😂😂😂😂هنوز یه هفته هم نشده شروع کردیم که به عاقبت رضا کیر خری دچار شدید. گوه خوردی ناموسا گوه خوردی🤣🤣🤣🤣؟ حرومزاده های جاکش میلیون ها بار هم گوه بخورید فایده نداره چون ضد ایران و ایرانی هستید و عاقبتتون مثل رهبر الدنگتون خامنه ایه
در پستفطرتی اعضای ملتفت همین بس که یه عمر با عوامفریبی و دروغ خون همین ملت رو برای منافعشون پله کردن در حالی که پشت پرده همش در حال توهین به ملت ایران بودن و دقیقا مثل جمهوری اسلامی به معترضا انگ میزدن و باهاشون دشمنی میکردن به افرادی که برای ایران مبارزه میکنن میگن سطلی به افرادی که برای یه زندگی معمولی مبارزه میکنن میگن گرسنه به افرادی که برای آزادی زنان مبارزه میکنن(سال ۱۴۰۱) میگن جوگیر و اعتقاد دارن کسی برای …
وویس های پراکنده از فدایی و کاربر والترک توی گروهی که با والترک داشتن و وویس های مهدیار توی گروه سه نفرشون ( مهدیار توی گروهی که والترک بود وویس نمیداد چون اعتماد نداشت بهش)
00:13 بی عرضه خطاب کردن شاهزاده و در ادامش تمسخر تیم شاهزاده و سروش هیچکس و خالی بند خطاب کردن و توهین به پهلوی 00:29 گاو خطاب کردن مردم توسط مهدیار و مشابه قرار دادن انتخاب خمینی در سال ۵۷ و انتخاب حال حاضر مردم ایران ( شاهزاده رضا پهلوی ) 00:34 کصکش خطاب کردن مردم ایران و گفتن اینکه مردم صرفا برای جیبشون رفتن اعتراض کردن 00:38 آقاجانی حرومزاده اینجا میگه که اعتراضات ۴۰۱، مردم از روی جوگیری رفتن 00:50 مدح و ستایش خا…
آرزو و لحظه شماری برای نابودی ایران و ایرانی بعد ۱۸ و ۱۹ دی. اونوقت چرا؟ چون میگه اگه جاویدنام ها زنده بودن(که همیشه یادشون و راهشون زندست حرومزاده) فحششون میدادن. اعتراضات و جون مردم ایران به قدری برای این بیشرفا در حد سرگرمی بوده که دنبال «فید» شدن آبان ۹۸ بودن چون با مادر جاویدنام پژمان قلیپور مشکل داشتن. مهدیار آقاجانی به قدری شیطانصفته که خودش هم ته پیامش قبول داره یه شیطان حروم زادست
اینجا یه گروه دیگست که فقط بین فدایی و مهدیار و عظیمیانه 00:06 توهین آقاجانی حرومزاده جاویدنام های دی ماه 00:11 مادرجنده خطاب کردن مردم توسط مهدیار و عقیده داشتن به اینکه جمهوری اسلامی از سر مردم ایران زیادشونه 00:30 آلت حواله دادن به مردم ایران توسط مهدیار 00:40 توهین به جاوید نام ها و ربط دادن حس و حال ناراحت مردم ایران اون روزا به شیعه بازی ( حرومزاده غیرایرانی تو که هیچ درکی از هیچی نداری گوه نخور نوچه اطلاعات)…
⏳
[ گایش گاه ملتفت ] pinned a photo
آدم نمیدونه با این حجم از عقب ماندگی اینا چیکار کنه عوام فریبی رو خوب یاد گرفتن از اشکون و آقاجانی کورید یا عقب مانده که کلمه edited رو نمیبینید ؟ یعنی توی اون تایم ویرایش شده این پیام. واقعا خندم میاد اینو توضیح بدم مهدکودکه مگه در ضمن پیام های این گروه هم توی سیگنال بوده نه اپلیکیشن دیگه ای
همین شات کافیه که این حرومزاده ها رو بشناسید همونطور که گفتم sha فداییه و اینم وویسش که حرف و حدیثی باقی نمونه
چت کیانا و مهدیار که اینجا عظیمیان تمام مدارک علیه ادمای جمهوری اسلامی رو کامل کرده فرستاده برای مهدیار توی یک فایل کامل
رسانه رپی که پست های اینجا رو میذارید فقط عکس و فیلم این حرومیا رو نذارید اون چیزایی که راجع به اینا گفته میشه رو هم پوشش بدید جون من در خطره از اینجا به بعد هزارتا بلا ممکنه سر من بیاد همونطور که سر کلی آدم ناشناس دیگه آوردن هدف من فقط اینه که مردم ایران اینا رو بشناسن و به این همکار مخفیای جمهوری اسلامی اعتماد نکنن
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @haromzadehaaaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 971,643 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[ گایش گاه ملتفت ]” (@haromzadehaaaa), 3,538 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/haromzadehaaaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.