Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Hari Beauty

Channel

Hari Beauty

@hari_beauty

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,509subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001606985414
TypeChannel
Username@hari_beauty
Created7 July 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hari_beauty

Growth

2,5092,5272,5187 August 2026 — 2,524 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,524 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,523 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,524 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,527 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,526 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,522 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,517 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,516 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,515 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,512 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,509 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 29 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,506–2,530 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 19:382,509-3
2 Sept 2026, 00:242,512-3
30 Aug 2026, 04:582,515-1
27 Aug 2026, 15:042,516-1
24 Aug 2026, 08:262,517-5
20 Aug 2026, 16:132,522-4
17 Aug 2026, 09:542,526-1
13 Aug 2026, 15:062,527+3
10 Aug 2026, 12:442,524+1
7 Aug 2026, 14:352,523-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:332,524no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:162,524first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

794 reactions across 15 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19424.4%
👍13116.5%
🔥10613.4%
custom 57785524400307621278811.1%
🤣8410.6%
custom 57761071562353582038110.2%
🤯263.27%
💯222.77%
😁162.02%
😢162.02%
❤‍🔥111.39%
💔91.13%
😭50.63%
😍20.252%
🤝20.252%
🤩10.126%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 794 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC529 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Избавляемся наконец от мусора и смотрим на закончившуюся косметику 🚮 📺 СМОТРЕТЬ НА YOUTUBE 📝 СМОТРЕТЬ В ДЗЕНЕ 📺 СМОТРЕТЬ В ВК

23🔥9

2 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC≈1,100 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

14custom 57785524400307621275custom 57761071562353582034🔥2😍2

1 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC≈1,050 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Знаю, вы подумали, что я сошла с ума и пришла затащить вас в сетевой маркетинг. Почти. Я перестала соблазняться на Фаберлик году в 2006-м. До этого времени я обожала все эти журналы с косметикой, которые чудом каждый раз появлялись у нас дома. Особенно если внутри было, чем натереться 😉 До этой весны я думала, что на этом наша история с сетевым маркетингом и закончилась. Ан нет. В апреле ездила в гости к подруге в

👍21custom 5776107156235358203167🔥4

30 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC≈1,100 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня изучаем очень много косметики To My Skin 🥰 📺 СМОТРЕТЬ НА YOUTUBE 📝 СМОТРЕТЬ В ДЗЕНЕ 📺 СМОТРЕТЬ В ВК

30❤‍🔥11custom 57785524400307621274👍2custom 57761071562353582031

24 Jul 2026, 14:16 UTC≈1,760 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

На вб акция на бренд Elian, в том числе на новую коллекцию

🔥2310👍9

24 Jul 2026, 12:38 UTC≈1,480 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 57785524400307621272015🔥8custom 57761071562353582033👍1🤩1

24 Jul 2026, 09:37 UTC≈1,160 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мне удалось истребить даже колхоз 🤦‍♀️ Спасибо пустым банкам, которые я не выбрасываю — выломала пульвик от текстурайзера Davines, встал, как родной.

👍30🔥10custom 57761071562353582037

23 Jul 2026, 07:02 UTC≈1,160 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Обзор новой коллекции от Elian ☀️ 📺 СМОТРЕТЬ НА YOUTUBE 📝 СМОТРЕТЬ В ДЗЕНЕ 📺 СМОТРЕТЬ В ВК

33custom 577610715623535820313custom 57785524400307621275👍2

22 Jul 2026, 11:53 UTC≈1,190 views111 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🤣84😁16👍6💔5

20 Jul 2026, 15:55 UTC≈1,370 views95 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Что-то красивое к нам приехало!

custom 577855244003076212750🔥3213

20 Jul 2026, 13:11 UTC≈1,250 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Не сразу поняла, что мне напоминают упаковки бренда Nunkoro, и почему так нравится эта эстетика Сегодня осенило — это очень похоже на Glossier 🥰

💯225👍2

19 Jul 2026, 17:06 UTC≈1,480 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пока моя новая корзина в яблоке маринуется, я покажу вам то, что уже успело доехать: 1️⃣Во-первых, гидрофильное масло от Dr.Ceuracle. Это теперь моё самое любимое средство такого рода. Чтобы вы понимали, маринуется в корзине ещё аж 2 в запас! Идеальное очищение, текстура — масло плотное, не растекается, и к тому же великолепно пахнет (на мой нос) — та самая вишенка на торте, которой не хватило Manyo. Пальма первенс

19🔥8custom 57761071562353582035custom 57785524400307621273👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @hari_beauty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Darianadar Makeup Lab
@darianadar · 66,864
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 20 August 2026
Marina Luxious
@marinaluxious · 35,611
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 2 September 2026
kriv.da, что нового❓
@dari_krivda · 29,782
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
RISHA MAKEUP
@rishamakeup · 29,746
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 8 September 2026
Shikstudio| Наталья Шик
@shikstudio · 57,104
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 24 August 2026
RedAutumn
@olyaredautumn · 108,068
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026
Косметичка Бо Хян
@Bonyabohyun · 53,059
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hari Beauty” (@hari_beauty), 2,509 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hari_beauty.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.