Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for قناة حرابيء

Channel

قناة حرابيء

@harabee2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

31,202subscribers

-164 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001790630064
TypeChannel
Username@harabee2
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/harabee2

Growth

31,20231,36631,2847 August 2026 — 31,366 subscribers7 August 2026 — 31,366 subscribers8 August 2026 — 31,349 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,320 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,306 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,309 subscribers12 August 2026 — 31,299 subscribers13 August 2026 — 31,284 subscribers14 August 2026 — 31,261 subscribers16 August 2026 — 31,234 subscribers17 August 2026 — 31,220 subscribers18 August 2026 — 31,202 subscribers7 August 202618 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 11 days, net -164. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,177–31,391 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 15:3331,202-18
17 Aug 2026, 13:0531,220-14
16 Aug 2026, 02:0431,234-27
14 Aug 2026, 11:4531,261-23
13 Aug 2026, 06:0631,284-15
12 Aug 2026, 09:1531,299-10
11 Aug 2026, 05:4231,309+3
10 Aug 2026, 09:0131,306-14
9 Aug 2026, 10:0131,320-29
8 Aug 2026, 07:3431,349-17
7 Aug 2026, 13:0031,366no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:4831,366first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 1 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.9%
avg views ÷ 31,202 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,340
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held21 (1 March 20258 August 2026)
Views total8,680
Reactions total228
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 09s
Average length
4m 09s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,453 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,41457.6%
👍51921.2%
👏2208.97%
🔥1184.81%
😢481.96%
🤔471.92%
👎431.75%
😁210.856%
🤯160.652%
😱30.122%
🤩20.082%
🥰20.082%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,453reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2025 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC≈2,880 views158 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

125👍25😢8

25 Jul 2026, 22:12 UTC≈5,800 views70 reactionsread 18 August 2026

هل تستخدمون موقع wix الإسرائيلي لتطوير مواقع الكترونية؟ شوفوا هالبديل العربي الأقوى جودة والأقل سعرا 🔥 https://webmana.ai/register/ec5388721a3c93a243e476fec8c8d85b0e7e51e108c685167d0a26daecef551d

👏3127👍9🔥3

6 Mar 2026, 22:34 UTC≈13,400 views89 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

هل نعيش الآن نهاية العالم؟

33👎31🤔17👍8

16 Feb 2026, 10:55 UTC≈16,100 views37 reactionsread 18 August 2026

اليوم آخر يوم والشروط بسيطة ‼️ مسابقة سحب على عمرة بقيمة 1000 دولار خلال شهر فبراير أي شخص يسجل في الموقع باستخدام هذا الرابط يدخل تلقائيًا في السحب على قسيمة/رصيد بقيمة 1000 دولار تُستخدم كنقاط داخل الموقع لحجز فنادق العمرة. التسجيل سهل وسريع، وكل من يسجل عبر رابطك يكون مؤهل للفوز. 📅 آخر موعد للتسجيل: 16 فبراير الرابط: https://halalbooking.com/go/aminchaar فوائد التسجيل للمتابعين: • خصم يصل إلى 10% • مكافأة 25 د

30🔥5🥰2

8 Feb 2026, 17:28 UTC≈13,500 views57 reactionsread 18 August 2026

https://youtu.be/0N9d4HDaibA

35👏11🔥7👍4

3 Jan 2026, 16:41 UTC≈17,200 views68 reactionsread 18 August 2026

هل كنت تعلم من قبل؟!!! شركات عالمية تموّل إبادة السودان https://youtu.be/oejCof6Pg74

49🤯16👏3

27 Dec 2025, 16:52 UTC≈14,200 views53 reactionsread 18 August 2026

الذهب: ملاذ آمن أم فخ استثماري؟ قصة أبو عبده ستغيّر رأيك بالكامل‼️ https://youtu.be/Oe0QBqOkgRM

46🔥7

20 Dec 2025, 17:00 UTC≈13,900 views82 reactionsread 18 August 2026

هل موبايلك داعم؟ https://youtu.be/1-H1HJcib1s

52👍21🔥8😱1

22 Nov 2025, 19:58 UTC≈14,700 views106 reactionsread 18 August 2026

إخواني وأخواتي لا تنسوا إخواننا في القطاع الشتاء قارص ولا حول لهم ولا قوة والوضع صعب يمكنكم المساهمة في حملتي ابتداءا من ٥$. ما نقص مال من صدقة ولعل صدقتك تكون شفيعة لك يوم الدين ❤️‍🩹 https://humanappeal.me/متطوعونا-وشراكاتنا/أمين-شعار?utm_source=chaar&utm_medium=instagram&utm_campaign=Gaza

75😢18👍13

17 Oct 2025, 09:06 UTC≈20,800 views101 reactionsread 18 August 2026
File

كتير حلوة للاجابة على اسئلة اطفالكم

69👍19👏9🔥4

1 Aug 2025, 14:02 UTC≈30,700 views312 reactionsread 18 August 2026

نزع الsلاح من الثلة القليلة التي تقاوم الصيصان هو أشبه بعملية خصي… لا ينتج عنها إلا جيل مخنث! الظاهر ما ضل غير نحكي بهيك طريقة وsخة لعل وعسى توصل الفكرة للبعض 🙂

👍22736🔥23👏15😢8😱2🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @harabee2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 923,179 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قناة حرابيء” (@harabee2), 31,202 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/harabee2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.