歡迎大家來到『吳亦凡帶你玩』出征報告分享群~這裡將提供一系列的出征報告,希望幫到你👍🏻 欢迎大家来到『吴亦凡带你玩』出征报告分享群~这里将提供一系列的出征报告,希望帮到你👍🏻

Channel
按摩|賽後報告研討會👍
@happyshare111
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,695subscribers
+95 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001899040871 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @happyshare111 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/happyshare111 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 5,695 | +25 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 5,670 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:42 | 5,671 | +21 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 5,650 | +12 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 5,638 | +18 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:51 | 5,620 | +18 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 5,602 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 5,600 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.33%
- avg views ÷ 5,695 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 531
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.449%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 April 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,594 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 12s
- Average length
- 6s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
77 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 47 | 61.0% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 14.3% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 10.4% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 9.09% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 5.19% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
⬆️EP 111 試看片段: https://t.me/Youtubeon99/886?single ⭐相關資訊已上傳到VIP會員群: https://t.me/c/1829757534/2050 📱📱📱官方YouTube頻道: https://youtube.com/@fanbadlife?si=8AuWHfVFmiIvA8Nn 报告: 最近刚好去龙岗区办事,顺带去探索一下这里有什么好玩! 在街头打的,顺便问问当地的老司机,他们给我介绍了这家会所!这家藏于横街窄巷的会所,非常低调,走过不仔细看都会错过! 外表看着非常破旧,上到去还好!小作坊,店内大约10个房间,洗澡房和普通家庭的差不多... 刚好是下午去到,上班就两个技师,部长都安排给我看了。第一个没看上,第二个穿萝莉服爱笑,想着来都来了,于是就点了! 过程还是蛮开心的,技师说自己刚下海,懂得不多,但愿意学!于是我便指导一下她,发现她还挺骚,叫声好听,也很爱说…
深圳 東門的水會 會所資訊如下: https://t.me/ngeventkefu/1440?single 項目介绍: 预约价位 ¥568 項目: 柔式按摩➕九五至尊💥 时间:(60分钟 ) 早班12:00/21:00 中班15:00/00:00 晚班21:00/06:00 ⚠️只有客服預約之后才能去 ⚠️一定要预约,否则不接待 出💦方式: 💥口出 👋手出 🐻胸推 🦵腿夹 🦶足出 服務項目 · 胸夹波打 | 手口并推 | 足底舒缓 · 上身全裸调理、蛋体护理、棍式吸蛋 · 腿足放松 | 情趣音乐 | 丝袜/内衣体验 · 全身漫游 | 高山流水 | 蚂蚁上树 | 海底捞月 | 舌尖漫游 | 柔情胸推 | 指尖调情 大堂服務及過夜 👍免费留宿 👍美味簡餐 👍飲品供應 #羅湖 立即加入討論: https://t.me/ngevent888
❤1👏1🔥1🥰1
⬆️EP 110 📱📱試看片段: https://t.me/Youtubeon99/877?single ⭐相關資訊已上傳到VIP會員群: https://t.me/c/1829757534/2038 📱📱官方YouTube頻道: https://youtube.com/@fanbadlife?si=8AuWHfVFmiIvA8Nn ❤️觀影前,感激您助推群組↓ https://t.me/boost/ngeventkefu 片名:熟悉的技師再見面,趁她沒留意不斷無套抽插她陰道😃 今天來了興致,好想找個妹子來無套插入,感受一下那些禁忌的做愛🔥 碰巧看到這家店裡面有個熟悉的面孔!原來是之前激戰過的女技師!想起之前和她的種種,我下體就不爭氣地勃了!於是乎,和客服約了時間上去找她! 以前加過她聯繫的,不過和她太久沒見,就忘記她的聯繫方式了... 上到去,她還記得我,感覺非常開心,說很想念我😂 我心想:想念我不會主動找我…
⬆️EP 109 試看片段: https://t.me/Youtubeon99/868?single 相關資訊已上傳到VIP會員群: https://t.me/c/1829757534/2026 官方YouTube頻道: https://youtube.com/@fanbadlife?si=8AuWHfVFmiIvA8Nn 包膠: 今天陰雨綿綿,下了好久都不停... 如此陰濕的天氣,讓我不禁想起了床,而想起床,我卻不禁地懷念起床上和美女激戰後,酣暢淋漓一番! 想到這裡,我就立刻打開手機,看看今天酒店的女郎有什麼好貨!仔細搜尋了一番,銅鑼灣有家酒店美女引起了我的註意,照片里的女生樣貌身材都很合我意!於是乎,我就和客服約了時間上去! 酒店比較偏僻,找了一會才找到,要上去更是迂迴曲折!不過排除萬難後,我都去到了!就是樓層有點高,等電梯花了挺長的時間... 去到門口,開門那刻,還是能認出照片中人!真人比較黑,165的身高,…
❤1
羅湖 富濠會所 會所資訊: https://t.me/ngeventkefu/1421?single 📱📱📱: https://youtu.be/cvitdOoLH2s?si=7vggUJfSp5sjHQuG JS 001 虞美人,日期:2026/7/11 指數668,收費600rmb。 提前两天预约,见到妹子,确实漂亮,不枉从虎门过来,妹子也很善谈,脸蛋身材很OK,服务开始,平常ab面正常服务,给我惊喜的是冰火口,舌头是真的软,由于小弟没吃过好的,第一次这样体验,感触颇深,差点直接交待,感觉到了赶紧开始磨,女上磨了会直接交待了,完事抱着倾心,下次会再返,天天爆满确实是有点东西的。 JS 888888 果果,收費540,指數667。 出击日期:2026/7/3 第一次去富濠,房间的灯倒是比皇家亮一点点。 约定时间的5分钟内进房(和大部分技师一样),一进来我还以为是走错了,因为真人比照片和视频漂亮很多,一见面很热情,上…
❤8
⬆️EP108 試看片段: https://t.me/Youtubeon99/859?single 相關資訊已上傳到VIP會員群: https://t.me/c/1829757534/2015 ❤️觀看報告前,感激您助推群組↓ https://t.me/boost/ngeventkefu 包膠: 前幾天做完腿部訓練,身體有點肌肉酸痛!加上運動後下體分泌出大量的睪酮素!結合上男性天生的基因 ~ 傳宗接代!所以身體好想出火,噴發出掉身體過剩的人類精華!綜合以上,老衲找了家精油按摩店! 在這家按摩店的頻道裡面,老衲一眼就瞥見了心儀已久的那位技師!剛好在今日的可預約名單裡,最近連著加班肩頸的緊繃感瞬間都好像輕了幾分。 我沒多猶豫,立刻點開線上客服通道,特意備註想要預約她的精油舒緩按摩項目,敲定了半小時後的到店時段。掛完確認消息後我簡單收拾了隨身物品往店裡走,想到待會兒能藉著恰到好處的精油推揉,把連日積攏的腰背痠痛和疲憊都慢慢…
❤1👍1👏1🔥1
歡迎大家來到『吳亦凡帶你玩』出征報告分享群~這裡將提供一系列的出征報告,希望幫到你👍🏻 欢迎大家来到『吴亦凡带你玩』出征报告分享群~这里将提供一系列的出征报告,希望帮到你👍🏻
⬆️EP 107 試看片段: https://t.me/Youtubeon99/850?single 相關資訊已上傳到VIP會員群: https://t.me/c/1829757534/2005 觀看報告前,請點擊👇🏻助推❤️ https://t.me/boost/ngeventkefu 包膠: 開門等左一陣,見到一個年輕長髮美女,個樣幾合我心水,於是就入左去! (後來得知佢遲開門係因為屙緊尿,笑死) 24歲既佢雖然係中超,但身材勻稱,走肥大籮友,後推必備! 相處落發現佢,處處散發青春氣息,性格陽光開朗愛笑,做女朋友真係一流🔥 服務黎講的話,十分配合! 陪沖個陣都洗得好仔細,仲俾埋漱口水一齊飲,所以一陣一定係靈魂大車🔥 跟住上到床都係各種主動,可以任操盤! 而且變換姿勢永冇黑臉,服務態度很好! 大戰過程可以觀看出征絕密片段😊 一定比我書寫既更加精彩10萬倍😏 立即加入討論: https://t.me/ngeve…
👍1👏1🔥1
⬆️EP 106 試看片段: https://t.me/Youtubeon99/840?single 相關資訊已上傳到VIP會員群: https://t.me/c/1829757534/1994 出征報告: 这个技师一开始加的时候以为是某会所的,和她私聊之下才知道她现在搞私约的!然后看价目表还可以开大,过夜😏 此情此景,直接冲! 和她约好了时间,记得那天是大晴天,太阳高高挂,我走路过去的差点没被晒死!去到她的工作室门口早已汗流满背! 以前私约都是快餐或者开大的,这次私约技师去工作室按摩还真第一次!抱着期待和紧张的心情,我推开了门走进去~ 房间里面很凉~技师认得出是照片的人,而且穿得很清爽~ 一身蕾丝紫色短裙,走起来春光乍泄,超级养眼~ 工作室里面全是技师喜欢的公仔,而且摆放整齐,很有住家的感觉~ 接着技师就带我去洗澡,没有陪冲,都是自己搞掂~ 不过这也合符去按摩的流程,还不用给小弟小费,又省了一笔! 洗完澡后自…
❤2👏1🔥1
⬆️EP 105 试看片段: https://t.me/Youtubeon99/831?single 相关资讯已上传到VIP会员群: https://t.me/c/1829757534/1981 報告: 周日下午,我一个人去了深圳黄贝岭城中村。天还亮着,巷子却已经像提前进入黄昏,楼与楼之间贴得很近,光线被切成一条条细缝,落在潮湿的地面上。 街边有小吃店、按摩店、便利店,还有几扇半掩着的门,里面透出一些说不清的声音。 我沿着窄巷慢慢走,没有特别的目的,只是想看看这座城市的另一面。这里的人很多,但每个人都像在赶路,彼此擦肩而过,没有停下来的理由。 空气里混着油烟、汗味和雨后残留的潮气,让人有种说不出的闷。 站在路口的时候,我忽然觉得,城市最真实的一面,往往不是高楼和霓虹,而是这些藏在边角里的地方。 它们不体面,也不浪漫,却把人的疲惫、欲望和孤独照得很清楚。那一刻我没有说话,只是静静看着,像在看一个不属于自己的世界!…
❤4👏1🔥1
⬆️EP 104 試看片段: https://t.me/Youtubeon99/822?single 相關資訊已上傳到VIP會員群: https://t.me/c/1829757534/1971 评价: 今天闲来无事,刚好看到鸡头的微信介绍00后刚下海的妹子,因为这个鸡头一向有诚信,基本上都没在吹牛逼,他说00后刚下海就是真的00后刚下海! 只有照片是假的,因为那些妹子都是来兼职的,一般是别人介绍或者鸡头自己街头遇到,不会是熟人! 而且很大机会这些来兼职的都住在附近,所以不会用他们的真人照片做招来! 由于不知道真人好看不好看,于是抱着坦克的心上去瞧瞧! 一早内心已经想好了几个剧本,主要的宗旨就是看到不喜欢的就下定决心离开,绝不会在不喜欢的妹子上花钱! 开门之后,妹子果然一看就年轻! 和她聊了一会,能清楚感受到彼此之间那种年代差距的鸿沟! 也有可能是这个妹子不懂 聊天,哈哈。 接着就是玉帛相见,连翻肉搏!! 要说这年轻…
❤4👏1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @happyshare111. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 82,721 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“按摩|賽後報告研討會👍” (@happyshare111), 5,695 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/happyshare111.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.