Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Happiness Initiative

Channel

Happiness Initiative

@happinessinitiative

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,362subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001479201566
TypeChannel
Username@happinessinitiative
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/happinessinitiative

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,3491,3791,3647 August 2026 — 1,349 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,349 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,350 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,353 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,356 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,359 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,362 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,370 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,369 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,372 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,373 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,379 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,360 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,362 subscribers1,3627 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,345–1,384 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 12:581,362+2
9 Sept 2026, 08:401,360-19
3 Sept 2026, 19:021,379+6
31 Aug 2026, 07:531,373+1
28 Aug 2026, 13:151,372+3
25 Aug 2026, 18:031,369-1
23 Aug 2026, 02:131,370+8
19 Aug 2026, 16:031,362+3
16 Aug 2026, 20:371,359+3
13 Aug 2026, 16:271,356+3
10 Aug 2026, 20:371,353+3
8 Aug 2026, 06:321,350+1
7 Aug 2026, 22:211,349no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:181,349first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 12 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

31 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2890.3%
🍓13.23%
😱13.23%
🥴13.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 December 2025 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Jul 2026, 12:59 UTC602 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

800+ people have joined WBC over the years, which is honestly still wild to us 🥺 Some came because a friend dragged them. Some came because life was a lot. Some came with zero idea what they signed up for. But they came. And somehow, week by week, the circle did its thing ❤️ People left feeling a little less alone, a little more grounded, and a little clearer about what matters. We’re down to one of our final few…

Signed Shermz

30 Jun 2026, 07:33 UTC638 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌿 Last call for Well-being Circles Wave 13! We start this Saturday, 4 July. Join us for 8 Saturday mornings of reflection, connection, and meaningful conversations in a guided small-group setting. 📅 Saturdays, 10.00am to 12.00pm 🗓 4 Jul to 22 Aug 2026 Slots are still available, so sign up now before the wave begins! Sign up here: https://form.jotform.com/251550067927460

❤1

Signed Happiness Initiative

9 Jun 2026, 02:09 UTC783 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Over 800 people have joined Well-Being Circles over the years. Some came because they were curious. Some came because a friend pulled them along. Some came because life was feeling a bit too much. Some came because they just wanted to meet people and do something meaningful with their Saturday mornings. Whatever the reason, many left with new perspectives, useful well-being skills, and a small circle of people they…

❤1

Signed Shermz

18 May 2026, 12:16 UTC843 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Wave 13 & 14 of Well-Being Circles are open for registration ✨ And with that, we only have 3 more waves left to go. Every wave, we hear the same thing: “I almost didn’t sign up.” Many people wait for the “right time” to prioritise themselves, reflect a little deeper, or meet people beyond small talk. But the truth is, meaningful change rarely arrives with perfect timing. Sometimes it starts with showing up for o…

❤5

Signed Happiness Initiative

3 Apr 2026, 06:40 UTC987 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Well-being Circles is coming to an end! Since 2021, Well-Being Circles has brought people together to pause, reflect, and grow through honest conversations and simple, evidence-based practices. Over the years, we’ve seen hundreds come through the programme. Some arrived burnt out. Some felt stuck. Many just wanted to make sense of where they were in life. And something shifts when you sit in a small circle with ot…

❤7🥴1

Signed Happiness Initiative

2 Mar 2026, 04:41 UTC≈1,060 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Lowkey tired of surface-level convos? Same. WBC Socials is basically where you skip the “so what do you do?” and go straight to the stuff that actually matters. We’ve got thoughtful prompts, real talk, and zero pressure to be impressive. Just show up as you are. Reflect a bit. Laugh a bit. Maybe overshare slightly. It’s safe here. Science says your relationships are one of the biggest predictors of well-being. So…

❤4

Signed Shermz

13 Feb 2026, 08:00 UTC997 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

☄️ PERSONALITY QUIZ LAUNCH ☄️ hey guys…ever wondered what food you are? (yes) well now you can find out! What food are you? (WBC Edition) 🥞 get 1 of 8 cute characters 💪 find out your strengths and improvement areas 😛 have LOTS OF FUN take the results with a pinch of salt, it’s meant to be quick, lighthearted and cute!😇😇 🔗 START THE QUIZ: https://uquiz.com/gbrIK1

😱1

Signed Happiness Initiative

12 Feb 2026, 07:10 UTCviews —

Happiness Initiative pinned «Anonymous Community Whispers 🤫 Ever wanted to say something, but didn't want anyone to know it's from you? Well.. we've launched just that, to hear what you have to say. Here's what you can share: ❓Questions - For HI, or for anyone else (e.g. general, specific…»

12 Feb 2026, 07:10 UTC806 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Anonymous Community Whispers 🤫 Ever wanted to say something, but didn't want anyone to know it's from you? Well.. we've launched just that, to hear what you have to say. Here's what you can share: ❓Questions - For HI, or for anyone else (e.g. general, specific ages/professions) 💭 Reflections and Thoughts - On anything you’ve been pondering about! 📖 Stories - Stories to inspire or uplift others Share it all anonymo…

🍓1

Signed Happiness Initiative

11 Feb 2026, 11:35 UTC772 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

some inspiration from our upcoming post tomorrow :) (don’t tell anyone we told you first 🤫) look out for it on our Instagram and TikTok 👀👀

❤3

Signed Happiness Initiative

11 Feb 2026, 11:30 UTC713 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

closing our wednesdays with a prompt for thought~ what’s your communication pet peeve? (online and offline!) 🗣️📱

  1. Passive Aggressiveness57%
  2. Saying something and then going “nevermind”41%
  3. Interrupting others28%
  4. Ignoring/avoiding what was said or answering partially43%
  5. Being vague/unclear38%
  6. Over-using filler words8%
  7. Others (comment! 💬)2%

The shares total 217%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed Happiness Initiative

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @happinessinitiative. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Feb 2026, 11:30 UTCAnonymous Poll61 voters

closing our wednesdays with a prompt for thought~ what’s your communication pet peeve? (online and offline!) 🗣️📱

  1. Passive Aggressiveness57%
  2. Saying something and then going “nevermind”41%
  3. Interrupting others28%
  4. Ignoring/avoiding what was said or answering partially43%
  5. Being vague/unclear38%
  6. Over-using filler words8%
  7. Others (comment! 💬)2%

The shares total 217%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 December 2025 to 4 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

PMET Jobs Alert by Job Security Council
@Job_Security_Council_PMET · 30,448
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Happiness Initiative” (@happinessinitiative), 1,362 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/happinessinitiative.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.