Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Happ Official channel

@happ_proxy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

28,855subscribers

+713 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002614967775
TypeChannel
Username@happ_proxy
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/happ_proxy

Growth

28,14228,85528,498.56 August 2026 — 28,142 subscribers6 August 2026 — 28,142 subscribers6 August 2026 — 28,228 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,310 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,405 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,524 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,643 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,741 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,855 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +713. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,035–28,962 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:4528,855+114
11 Aug 2026, 23:2428,741+98
10 Aug 2026, 22:0828,643+119
9 Aug 2026, 21:5128,524+119
8 Aug 2026, 20:0328,405+95
7 Aug 2026, 20:1428,310+82
6 Aug 2026, 19:2428,228+86
6 Aug 2026, 02:0128,142no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:5228,142first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
84.6%
avg views ÷ 28,855 subscribers
Avg views / post
24,400
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (9 April 20267 August 2026)
Views total48,800
Reactions total844
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 27s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,762 reactions across 19 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,76147.9%
1,36823.7%
🔥82514.3%
🤬1242.15%
👎1001.74%
💩851.48%
🤣811.41%
❤‍🔥651.13%
🍾641.11%
🙏510.885%
😢390.677%
🤔250.434%
👏240.417%
😁230.399%
💯220.382%
👌210.364%
160.278%
🤝150.26%
😱130.226%
🐳120.208%
6 further kinds280.486%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,857reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
246
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 20 we hold a reading for · 80%
Most on one post
103
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @happ_proxy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 April 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
5.00%
1 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
47,400
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
39,800
over 19 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
verification17 May 20267 May 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 7 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC≈18,100 views349 reactions103 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

Четвертый раз приложение исчезло из App Store в РФ, но в глобальном App Store оно доступно. Рекомендуем сменить регион в App Store и установить глобальную версию Happ. (См видео) Скоро мы выложим приложение повторно в РФ стор. И так же скоро будет доступно отдельное приложение для премиум провайдеров. 🤝 P.s. По срокам от одной недели до месяца. От нас не зависит. Так долго проверяют теперь приложения в App Store.

197🤣67🔥27😢19🍾12👌8👍6👎6

30 Jul 2026, 15:58 UTC≈30,700 views495 reactions33 Starsread 12 August 2026

И наконец-то мы прошли проверку в App Store, и приложение снова доступно в российском магазине! (Это было непросто.) Для начала хотел бы попросить вас установить версию из TestFlight и протестировать её. При обнаружении багов, пожалуйста, сообщите о них через форму: https://issues.happ.info/ ### Ссылка на российский TestFlight https://testflight.apple.com/join/ty3mgx76 ### Ссылка на глобальный TestFlight https:

262👍112🔥76🍾25💩6❤‍🔥5👏4🤣3

11 Jul 2026, 06:43 UTC≈39,800 views968 reactions10 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Уважаемые разработчики приложений! Мы видим, что после каждого удаления нашего приложения из российского App Store вы спешно переименовываете свои приложения и пытаетесь привлечь трафик, используя название Happ. Не стоит этого делать. В отношении каждого такого приложения мы подаём жалобу о нарушении прав на товарный знак и добиваемся его удаления из App Store. P.s. Наше приложение уже на последнем этапе модерации

👍642164🔥91😁19💯14🙏11🐳9👏7

7 Jul 2026, 03:50 UTC≈56,400 views420 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

Уже в третий раз приложение исчезло из App Store в РФ, но в глобальном App Store оно доступно. Рекомендуем сменить регион в App Store и установить глобальную версию Happ. (См видео) Новую версию Happ для РФ App Store мы уже отправили на проверку. В ближайшие дни она будет доступна для скачивания.

👍276🤬7547💯8💩5😢5🤝2🍾1

5 Jul 2026, 14:19 UTC≈33,600 views264 reactions6 Starsread 12 August 2026

📖 Новая премиум функция сброса настроек! Пользователь изменил множество настроек, и службе поддержки приходится тратить время на объяснение, как вернуть приложение в исходное состояние и заново добавить подписку? Теперь это можно сделать с помощью доп параметров добавленных к вашей подписке. Просто добавьте к ссылке подписки параметры reset и providerid: https://example.ru/WxyFfvZRxSR4j2LL#?reset=1&providerid=your

135👍68🔥27💩11👎6🥱63👌3

29 Jun 2026, 04:04 UTC≈128,000 views838 reactions18 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Приложение Happ вновь доступно в российском App Store! Ссылка для скачивания: https://apps.apple.com/ru/app/happ-proxy-utility/id6783623643 Поиск в App Store ещё не успел проиндексировать приложение, поэтому пока по запросу Happ могут отображаться только фейки. Будьте внимательны и используйте ссылку выше. Думаю, в течение нескольких дней поиск по слову "Happ" начнёт работать корректно.

👍525🔥155106❤‍🔥14🍾11👎95💩4

24 Jun 2026, 12:34 UTC≈51,100 views763 reactions20 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Новое приложение уже на проверке в App Store. Модерация - вещь непредсказуемая. Могут проверить за пару дней, а может затянуться на месяц. Как только приложение проверят, мы сразу сообщим всем в этом канале.

👍473129🔥111🙏33🍾11🤝5💩1

24 Jun 2026, 03:57 UTC≈169,000 views517 reactions9 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

Уже второй раз за три года РКН удаляет наше приложение из Российского App Store. А значит скоро будет третье! А пока что можем порекомендовать видео по смене региона в App Store для установки глобальной версии Happ.

👍34070🔥46🤬20😱13😢107❤‍🔥3

1 Jun 2026, 06:05 UTC≈50,900 views141 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://xtls.github.io/ru/config/transports/tls.html#tlsobject С 1 июня в xray перестал работать параметр allowInsecure. Вместо него рекомендуется использовать pinnedPeerCertSha256 или фрагментацию. Domain fronting с произвольным SNI по-прежнему поддерживается. Например, если вы хотите обратиться к Fastly с SNI example.com, а сертификат по умолчанию — fastly.com, достаточно указать в конфигурации: "verifyPeerCertByN

👍61🤔2522💩15👎13🔥5

29 May 2026, 08:55 UTC≈44,500 views79 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

Новый параметр Email службы поддержки! Укажите в настройках профиля "Email службы поддержки" на сайте happ-proxy.com и получайте письма от ваших пользователй даже если они удалили подписку или забыли где покупали. 📖

🔥4520👎5👌4👍3🍾2

7 May 2026, 14:51 UTC≈55,900 views250 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026

Касаемо вылетов у некоторых устройств Android после последнего обновления: причина в том, что Google Play при обновлении старается как можно меньше подгрузить данных и устанавливает только изменённые части приложения. В новой версии было изменено ядро, поэтому обновляется лишь часть кода, чего недостаточно для корректной работы бинарного файла - в результате приложение вылетает при подключении. Решение: полностью уд

👍126👎41🤬29💩2812😢5❤‍🔥4🥱4

7 May 2026, 13:42 UTC≈47,400 views64 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Advertisementerid verification

iOS(release)-macOS(in review) 4.9.0 Release Global, Rus • A ton of minor bug fixes like validation translations, etc. • Scroll Indicator toggle • Reworked "Floating Button" feature • New core 26.3.27 • Inbounds configuration • Selectable timeout for subscription request • Ping UX (async, threading, all that stuff + full cancellation when VPN is off) • ProviderID verification via file (bundle/cached) • Fronting fix

42👍10👎5👏4🍾2💩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @happ_proxy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 6,668 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Happ Official channel” (@happ_proxy), 28,855 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/happ_proxy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.