Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Арбитраж без воздуха

@hanballit_arbitrage

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,437subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002229608155
TypeChannel
Username@hanballit_arbitrage
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hanballit_arbitrage

Growth

2,4372,4412,4397 August 2026 — 2,441 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,440 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,437 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,436–2,442 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 01:052,437-3
7 Aug 2026, 23:272,440-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:482,441first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 1 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

515 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
31561.2%
🔥11021.4%
👍356.80%
❤‍🔥305.83%
😁132.52%
💯122.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 515reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 29 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 18 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hanballit_arbitrage. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 April 2026 to 29 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 May 2026, 15:17 UTC≈1,650 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

✔️✔️Снимаем блокировки Bybit любой сложности 🔵перманенты 🔵санкционный Tether 🔵Tether, зависший с санкционных бирж 🔵заморозки средств и аккаунтов 🔵любые блокировки Bybit ⚠️Работаем напрямую с человеком из офиса Bybit, без посредников и без конских переплат. Разбираем даже сложные кейсы, от которых другие отказываются. 📩 Контакт: @hanballit/@peerhack Все сообщения и чаты разбираю постепенно, вне зависимости от зап

8

27 May 2026, 09:06 UTC≈1,610 views45 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Да примет Аллах от нас и от вас! Всех мусульман поздравляю с праздником Ид Аль Адха. Желаю вам успехов и лучших начинаний❤️

45

13 May 2026, 10:56 UTC≈1,900 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Про это тоже, к слову, не забыл. Сегодня пишу пост и публикую) Правда вот реакциями вы обидели, ничего в этот раз сделаю вид что не заметил🤭

🔥146

13 May 2026, 10:35 UTC≈1,930 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Продам способ накрутки ордеров на ByBit (не внутренний баланс EUR/USD) Есть возможность делать до 1000-5000 ордеров в день Предназначение: •абуз статы для переноса в Wallet •абуз статы для мерчантов и блочных мерчей •абуз статы для получения мейкеров без залога цена: 1.000$ Продам выборочно пару людям писать в лс @hanballit

8🔥3

2 May 2026, 09:58 UTC≈1,890 views35 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Я всё это к чему вообще пишу - хотелось бы, если честно, пройтись по теме подхода к какому-либо делу, поделиться с вами своим опытом и спроецировать всё это на арбитраж в 2026. Как вам идея?

18👍11❤‍🔥6

2 May 2026, 09:57 UTC≈1,740 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я в какой-то момент поймал себя на мысли, что дело вообще не в арбитраже. И даже не в работе самой конкретной. Это странно звучит, потому что обычно всё начинается именно с выбора сферы. Кажется, что если найти “правильное направление”, дальше всё сложится. Но со временем начинаешь видеть, что проблема чаще всего не там. В начале всё выглядит довольно просто. Есть связка, есть действие, есть результат. И кажется, чт

18👍6

28 Apr 2026, 11:07 UTC≈1,540 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ByBit выкатил обновление. Стакан ожил? 🆕 Что поменялось: - Добавили фильтр выстраивания объявлений в стакане. Теперь по умолчанию стоит «общая сортировка»-стакан стал реально живым, а не статичной витриной. - Появился фильтр по стране. Все левые дроп-профили будут постепенно уходить в неликвидную часть стакана за счёт отбора по гео со стороны тейкеров. По факту: стакан ожил. И самое важное - теперь он по умолчанию

11

27 Apr 2026, 06:39 UTC≈1,540 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Работа с банками в 2026 году. Ферма, главные триггеры, цепочка действий. Самый частый вопрос после предыдущего поста: «а как работает твоя команда?» Ловите инструкцию от «никогда не крутил на картах» до «шарю за каждый нюанс» Внутри: -Выбор и открытие рабочего материала -Прогрев рабочего материала -Старт материала, календарь использования -Основная работа с материалом -Главные триггеры Читается за 5-10 минут, реа

🔥3212❤‍🔥11👍3

16 Apr 2026, 10:33 UTC≈1,420 views47 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Продолжая размышлять об арбитраже в 2026 году, ловлю себя на мысли: есть слишком много нюансов, которые не уместишь даже в формат мини-подкаста. Первые тревожные звоночки в нашей нише прозвучали ещё зимой 24-го. Но к ноябрю 2025 всё начало закручиваться уже по-настоящему - по всем фронтам, без исключений. Именно в тот момент я, без лишнего героизма, аккуратно «покинул чат» и отправился перезагружаться, ловить тишину

🔥3011👍6

11 Apr 2026, 09:47 UTC≈1,430 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Забавно наблюдать, как многие продолжают называть свой контент «эксклюзивным» - всерьёз думая, что это не считывается. Я давно заметил закономерность: как только я плотно начинаю постить и включаю своё умение интриговать - у некоторых начинается то самое внутреннее жжение. И сразу появляется «вдохновение». Иначе сложно объяснить, зачем так старательно копировать не только смыслы постов, но и даже фото, которые я со

13🔥5💯3❤‍🔥1

10 Apr 2026, 14:44 UTC≈1,310 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

🎤 Подкаст: реалии арбитража в 2026. Жив или все же умер? Рассказал про основной подход к нашему направлению работы на сегодня. Какие возможности развития я вижу на ближайшее время. И ответил на самый главный вопрос: «стоит ли сейчас заниматься этим?» Всем хорошего прослушивания) В коментах можете написать темы, на которые вам интересно было бы послушать подкасты в дальнейшем

13👍5❤‍🔥4

8 Apr 2026, 15:36 UTC≈1,340 views62 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Было дело как то я обещал тут сделать мини-подкаст на самую главную тему этого года🫣 Делаем? Реакции покажут👇

29🔥19💯9👍4❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @hanballit_arbitrage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 218,642 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Арбитраж без воздуха” (@hanballit_arbitrage), 2,437 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hanballit_arbitrage.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.