[글로벌ETF] ETF Catch-up : KRICS 도입에 따른 KRX 주요 지수 방법론 개정 ▶️ 하나증권 Global ETF 장치영(T.3771-3669) ▶️ 자료: https://buly.kr/9BYif5y ▶️ 텔레그램: https://t.me/hana_globaletf ★ 새 산업분류가 바꾸는 ETF 포트폴리오 » 한국거래소는 국내 산업구조를 반영한 자체 산업분류체계 KRICS를 구축하고, 10월 26일부터 종목별 산업분류 결과를 공표할 예정 » KRICS는 KRX 주요 지수에 순차적으로 적용될 예정. 10월 20일 기준 한국거래소 주가지수를 추종하는 ETF는 171개, 합산 순자산은 약 63조 원으로, 지수 구성 변경에 따른 ETF의 종목 편출입·비중 조정 과정에서 매수·매도 수요 발생 가능 ★ 리밸런싱 효과는 신규 편입…
![Telegram profile photo for [하나증권 ETF] 장치영](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/4f/4fc829eec65d5b64547c8c27cd5ef1a93ac82c2ac274375f492048f779c3937f.jpg)
Channel
[하나증권 ETF] 장치영
@hana_globaletf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
35subscribers
+30 since we began measuring on 22 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004372987684 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hana_globaletf |
| Created | 14 October 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 22 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hana_globaletf |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 19:00 | 35 | +4 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 19:29 | 31 | +7 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:40 | 24 | +19 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 00:22 | 5 | first reading |
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 14 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1041.4%
- avg views ÷ 35 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 365
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (14 October 2026 – 21 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,458 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Oct 2026, 00:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (42.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
[10/22 ETF Morning check] "돈 버는 SpaceX" ✓ S&P500 +0.58%, NASDAQ +1.05%, DOW +0.69%, Russell2000 +0.27% » SpaceX의 어닝서프라이즈에 기술주 중심으로 투심이 회복되며 주요 지수 모두 상승 마감한 가운데 나스닥은 +1%대 상승을 기록 » 주요 경제지표 발표가 부재한 가운데 3분기 실적 시즌이 본격화되면서 시장의 관심은 AI 기업들의 실적에 집중되는 모습. SpaceX는 상장 이후 첫 분기 흑자를 기록했으며 세부적으로 AI 매출 호조에 +7.8% 상승했고, Tesla도 SpaceX와의 합병 검토 소식에 3.4% 상승 » 장 마감 후 메타는 3분기 매출이 시장 예상을 상회하며 시간외 거래에서 3%대 상승. AI 투자 확대 부담에에도 광고 사업 중심으로 견조…
[10/16 ETF Morning check] "온도차" ✓ S&P500 +0.33%, NASDAQ +0.08%, DOW +1.08%, Russell2000 +1.37% » 9월 CPI에 이어 PPI도 시장 예상치를 상회했으나 증시 반응은 제한적. AI 투자에 대한 경계감으로 안전자산인 국채에 매수세가 유입되면서 미 국채 10년물 금리는 전일 대비 10.2bp 하락한 5.09%로 마감 » 국채금리 하락에 힘입어 주요 지수는 장중 낙폭을 만회하고 상승 마감. 다만 AI 투자 수익성에 대한 우려가 지속되며 업종별 차별화된 흐름 전개 👍 상승 섹터: XLV(헬스케어) +1.86%, XLY(경기소비재) +1.71%** » 기술주 변동성 확대 속 헬스케어 등 경기방어 업종으로 매수세 유입. 경기소비재에서는 견조한 소매판매 지표와 함께 나이키…
[10/15 국내 ETF Flow check] » 국내 증시 조정이 이어지는 가운데 KOSPI200 등 지수형 ETF를 중심으로 저가 매수성 자금 유입 확대. 다만, 커버드콜과 머니마켓 ETF로도 자금 유입이 이어지며 경계 심리는 여전한 모습. 한편, 위험자산 선호 심리가 약화되는 가운데 일부 미국 국채 ETF로도 자금 유입 » 반도체 ETF는 전일에 이어 자금 유입 규모가 확대되며 업종형뿐 아니라 핵심공정·소부장·메모리 등 세부 밸류체인 전반으로 매수세 확산. AI 전력 인프라 관련 ETF로도 자금이 유입된 반면, 미국 대표지수 ETF의 자금 유입은 전일 대비 둔화
Channel name was changed to «[하나증권 ETF] 장치영»
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @hana_globaletf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[하나증권 ETF] 장치영” (@hana_globaletf), 35 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hana_globaletf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.