Channel
@hamster_NFT
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
997subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001324804530 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hamster_NFT |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hamster_NFT |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 997 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 997 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (29 June 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,994 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
62% токенов из топ-100 не переживают даже 5 лет 💧 Из 1539 проектов, залетавших в топ-100 по капитализации, 71,9% уже фактически мертвы (делистинг и объем торгов < $10 тыс./день). Медианный срок жизни токена – всего 2 года и 4 месяца, а через 10 лет, по оценкам, "выживает" только ~15% проектов. 💡 Вот вам и лучшее доказательство того, что стратегия "купил и забыл" в крипте работает только для битка и эфира. Остальные…
🇰🇵 Биржа Bybit подала в суд на КНДР за крупнейший в истории взлом на $1.5 млрд в феврале 2025 года.
🤖 Майкл Сэйлор заявил, что ChatGPT помог Strategy создать новый финансовый инструмент и привлечь около $15 млрд на покупку Биткоина. Его главный совет на эпоху ИИ — не соревноваться с роботами в рутинной работе, а использовать их для создания продуктов и решений, которых раньше не существовало.
С 20 по 24 июля Strive приобрела 79 биткоинов примерно за $5,2 млн. Средняя цена с учетом комиссий составила $65 723 за монету. При текущих котировках стоимость этих активов составляет примерно $1,3 млрд. Основной источник средств — выпуск привилегированных бессрочных акций SATA. Недавно компания повысила дивидендную доходность по этим примерно до 13% и заявила, что продолжает направлять полученные от продажи бумаг с…
«Trump Media» перечислила более 2 600 $BTC на Crypto com
☠️ В результате уязвимости кошелька Coldcard было похищено BTC на $38 000 000 с 500 адресов.
🇪🇺 Крупные европейские банки и финансовые компании запустили RL1 — общую регулируемую блокчейн-сеть для выпуска токенизированных облигаций, фондов и стейблкоинов. Сеть уже работает, объединяет более 50 участников и обработала около €700 млн транзакций.
🔖 Биржа BitMart закрывается С 26 июля приостановлены регистрация, депозиты и новые ордера. Торговля прекратится 26 августа, полное закрытие - 31 января 2027. Вывод средств остаётся доступен - компания призывает пользователей забрать активы как можно скорее.
☠️ На GitHub нашли около 7600 фальшивых репозиториев, через которые распространяли стилер StealC — связанные файлы скачали более 14 млн раз. Самое опасное, что вредоносные проекты маскировались под ИИ-инструменты и MCP-серверы, поэтому их могли рекомендовать пользователям даже ChatGPT, Gemini и Claude.
🪙 Проснулся участник ICO Ethereum, который в 2014 году купил 2000 ETH всего за $620 — сейчас эти монеты стоят около $3 790 000, рост составил более 6000x.
😤 Трамп фактически начал зарабатывать на своих публикациях. Trump Media запускает платный API, предоставляющий Уолл-стрит возможность получать доступ к публикациям в Truth Social в реальном времени, включая посты самого Трампа. Его твиты и обращения часто вызывают колебания на рынках, поэтому такой доступ становится значительным преимуществом для высокочастотных трейдеров.
🔪 В Южной Корее инвестор с ножом напал на криптоблогера, после советов которого, потерял деньги — пострадавший выжил, а нападавшего задержали спустя два часа по подозрению в покушении на убийство. Не ходите, дети, к криптоблогерам гулять 🚬
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hamster_NFT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,245,681 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ретродропы | Крипто хомяк” (@hamster_NFT), 997 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hamster_NFT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.