Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for π™ƒπ˜Όπ™‡π˜Όπ™‡ π˜Ύπ™π™”π™‹π™π™Š

Channel

π™ƒπ˜Όπ™‡π˜Όπ™‡ π˜Ύπ™π™”π™‹π™π™Š

@halal_crypto1

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry

70,635subscribers

+34,336 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002018672975
TypeChannel
Username@halal_crypto1
DescriptionπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Halal Crypto US β€” your daily source for halal crypto insights, Islamic DeFi updates, and ethical blockchain trends. Learn about Bitcoin, Ethereum, halal tokens, and Sharia-compliant strategies to grow your crypto portfolio in a halal way.
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/halal_crypto1

Topic

Crypto & trading β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

31,88870,71851,30370,6357 August 202610 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 95 days, net +34,336. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,064–76,543 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 11:1470,635-83
9 Nov 2026, 00:0670,718+194
7 Nov 2026, 15:5870,524+1,706
6 Nov 2026, 12:1768,818+833
5 Nov 2026, 11:0967,985+218
4 Nov 2026, 08:5967,767-157
3 Nov 2026, 06:5167,924-328
2 Nov 2026, 05:2968,252-304
1 Nov 2026, 07:3768,556-61
31 Oct 2026, 10:4468,617-582
30 Oct 2026, 10:3869,199-350
29 Oct 2026, 13:5969,549-343
28 Oct 2026, 16:1969,892+75
27 Oct 2026, 17:2069,817-121
26 Oct 2026, 14:4469,938-71
25 Oct 2026, 12:1070,009+2,387
24 Oct 2026, 11:3167,622+2,243
23 Oct 2026, 09:2765,379+883
22 Oct 2026, 09:1764,496+3,018
21 Oct 2026, 00:4061,478first reading

Engagement

1,308 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 170 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
14.6%
avg views Γ· 70,635 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,300
580 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.797%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
580
of 1,308 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 577 of 580 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held1,308 (6 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total5,984,339
Reactions total47,686
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 00:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
β‰ˆ4,110
Videos
β‰ˆ554
Links
β‰ˆ7,960

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 β€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
13m 39s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 39 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

54,118 reactions across 995 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 4.04% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😴2,1854.04%
😱2,1583.99%
😒2,1193.92%
πŸ₯°1,9963.69%
πŸ”₯1,9673.63%
😭1,9473.60%
πŸ™1,9323.57%
πŸŽ‰1,8993.51%
❀1,8973.51%
🀣1,8923.50%
πŸ‘1,8833.48%
🍌1,8443.41%
πŸ‘Œ1,8163.36%
πŸ˜‡1,8093.34%
πŸ€—1,8033.33%
😍1,7913.31%
🍾1,7893.31%
πŸŽ„1,7893.31%
πŸ‘1,7603.25%
😎1,7373.21%
12 further kinds16,10529.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 995 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 54,118 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 1 September 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own β€˜edited’ marker: 0 of 580 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before β€” this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 21:11 UTCβ‰ˆ6,090 views37 reactionsread 11 November 2026

How strong was OpenAI’s latest revenue growth? Revenue climbed 50% to $10 billion in the third quarter. CFO Sarah Friar said annualized revenue rose 70%. π™ƒπ˜Όπ™‡π˜Όπ™‡ π˜Ύπ™π™”π™‹π™π™Š #OpenAI #RevenueGrowth #AIRevenue #QuarterlyEarnings #AnnualizedRevenue

πŸŽ‰6🍾5πŸ‘5πŸ“4πŸ₯°4πŸ‘3πŸ€—3😭3

10 Nov 2026, 21:09 UTCβ‰ˆ6,360 views31 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

$74,000. Bitcoin just hit a major milestone. πŸ“Š π™ƒπ˜Όπ™‡π˜Όπ™‡ π˜Ύπ™π™”π™‹π™π™Š #Bitcoin #CryptoMarket #BitcoinPrice #CryptoMilestone

πŸ€“7πŸ‘4😍4πŸ™ˆ3✍2🍌2🍾2πŸŽ‰2

10 Nov 2026, 20:58 UTCβ‰ˆ5,620 views29 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

1 day, it’ll happen to everyone, says Ledger’s CEO: β€œEverybody will be hacked at some point.” A cheerful forecast from the crypto wallet boss. π™ƒπ˜Όπ™‡π˜Όπ™‡ π˜Ύπ™π™”π™‹π™π™Š #CryptoSecurity #WalletHacks #Ledger #Cybersecurity #CryptoWallets

🍌5⚑4πŸ“4πŸ‘€3😎3🍾2🀝2😱2

10 Nov 2026, 20:43 UTCβ‰ˆ5,390 views12 reactionsread 11 November 2026

How did Fidelity’s Strategy $MSTR stake reach $156 million? It tripled its position, according to an SEC filing. πŸ’°πŸ’« π™ƒπ˜Όπ™‡π˜Όπ™‡ π˜Ύπ™π™”π™‹π™π™Š #Fidelity #MicroStrategy #BitcoinInvestment #CryptoHoldings #SECFiling

😭4πŸŽ„3πŸ‘Œ2⚑1😁1😱1

10 Nov 2026, 20:16 UTCβ‰ˆ5,290 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Which coins are trending today? 1. SI 2. DACITY 3. BTC 4. INIT 5. ETH 6. ZEC 7. PEARL 8. HYPE 9. LIT 10. AVAX 11. VVV 12. SOL 13. NEAR 14. QTC 15. LINK π™ƒπ˜Όπ™‡π˜Όπ™‡ π˜Ύπ™π™”π™‹π™π™Š #Crypto #TrendingCoins #Bitcoin #Ethereum #Altcoins

πŸ€“3✍2

10 Nov 2026, 19:41 UTCβ‰ˆ5,540 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Russia and Ukraine have returned to face-to-face peace talks after a nine-month pause. The first signs of progress are tentative, but they’re there - a small step toward ending a war now in its four-and-a-halfth year. π™ƒπ˜Όπ™‡π˜Όπ™‡ π˜Ύπ™π™”π™‹π™π™Š #RussiaUkraineTalks #PeaceNegotiations #UkraineWar #Diplomacy #Ceasefire Talks

πŸ‘8πŸ‘3πŸ€“2😁1πŸ˜‡1😎1

10 Nov 2026, 19:36 UTCβ‰ˆ5,330 views18 reactionsread 11 November 2026

⚑️ How many times was Trump briefed about Nvidia’s ($NVDA) Huang? At least twice, according to a May briefing from Rubio aboard Air Force One. That briefing contradicts Trump’s denial. βœ… Trade on WEEX πŸ’Έ π™ƒπ˜Όπ™‡π˜Όπ™‡ π˜Ύπ™π™”π™‹π™π™Š #Nvidia #DonaldTrump #JensenHuang #CryptoTrading #NVDA

πŸ€“13πŸŽ‰3😭2

10 Nov 2026, 18:56 UTCβ‰ˆ5,370 views11 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Fidelity’s stake in Strategy reached $156 million after tripling, while Amundi, Europe’s largest asset manager, increased its holding by 43.7% in Q3. π™ƒπ˜Όπ™‡π˜Όπ™‡ π˜Ύπ™π™”π™‹π™π™Š #Bitcoin #Strategy #InstitutionalInvestors #Fidelity #Amundi

πŸ”₯6😐2😒2❀1

10 Nov 2026, 18:51 UTCβ‰ˆ5,080 views21 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Why does Senate Democratic Leader Schumer find Trump’s defense of Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang β€œtroubling”? Schumer says a β€œfull accounting” is needed of what he calls Trump’s β€œfailure to address foreign espionage in the American tech industry.” π™ƒπ˜Όπ™‡π˜Όπ™‡ π˜Ύπ™π™”π™‹π™π™Š #Nvidia #JensenHuang #USSenate #TechEspionage #TrumpAdministration

πŸ‘6😍6πŸ‘Œ5πŸ‘1πŸ€—1🀝1πŸ˜‡1

10 Nov 2026, 17:39 UTCβ‰ˆ5,450 views30 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

$430,000 was moved through six memecoins on the NEAR blockchain, according to Elliptic. The tokens were used to shift part of the $6.3 billion stolen from Binance to other wallets, making the funds harder to trace. They traded actively for several hours, then were abandoned. Alleged North Korean hackers used a similar method after the Bybit hack. π™ƒπ˜Όπ™‡π˜Όπ™‡ π˜Ύπ™π™”π™‹π™π™Š #CryptoHeist #Memecoin #NEARBlockchain #CryptoTracing …

😭10πŸ‘7πŸ‘4😍4πŸŽ‰3😎2

10 Nov 2026, 17:36 UTCβ‰ˆ5,240 views21 reactionsread 11 November 2026

$600M in crypto liquidations hit within 4 hours as prices fell: SOL dropped below $82, XRP below $1, ETH below $2,000, and BTC below $73,000. π™ƒπ˜Όπ™‡π˜Όπ™‡ π˜Ύπ™π™”π™‹π™π™Š #CryptoLiquidations #Bitcoin #Ethereum #Solana #XRP

πŸŽ„7πŸ‘6πŸ€—3❀1🍾1πŸŽ‰1🀝1😘1

10 Nov 2026, 17:00 UTCβ‰ˆ5,030 views22 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Could a December rate hike be getting more likely? Odds have reached a new high after October inflation came in above expectations. The US 10-year Treasury yield has also climbed back above 5.00%. π™ƒπ˜Όπ™‡π˜Όπ™‡ π˜Ύπ™π™”π™‹π™π™Š #FedRateHike #USInflation #TreasuryYields #InterestRates #CryptoMarkets

πŸŽ„13😴6❀2πŸ™1

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,308 posts we hold for @halal_crypto1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ™ƒπ˜Όπ™‡π˜Όπ™‡ π˜Ύπ™π™”π™‹π™π™Šβ€ (@halal_crypto1), 70,635 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/halal_crypto1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.