$PRICELESS 250k -400k. good job โก๏ธ 0x7d3b5e20210a4a4a70de8252337992d7ad2d7777
๐ฅ5๐2๐ฅฐ2
Signed gemhai ๐

Channel
@haiwaitgo
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Posts edited after publishing ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
16,505subscribers
-5,791 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001677700135 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @haiwaitgo |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/haiwaitgo |
Crypto & trading โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 16,505 | -235 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:21 | 16,740 | -57 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:58 | 16,797 | -73 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 16,870 | +699 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:40 | 16,171 | -190 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 16,361 | -271 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 16,632 | -373 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:15 | 17,005 | -133 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:22 | 17,138 | -49 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:56 | 17,187 | -305 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:28 | 17,492 | -688 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 18,180 | -1,242 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 19,422 | -437 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 19,859 | -130 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 19,989 | -36 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 20,025 | +206 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 19,819 | -67 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 19,886 | -64 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:54 | 19,950 | -78 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 20,028 | first reading |
54 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 54 (31 July 2026 โ 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 4,665 |
| Reactions total | 46 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 09:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
938 reactions across 54 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 343 | 36.6% | |
| ๐ฅ | 177 | 18.9% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 121 | 12.9% | |
| ๐ | 76 | 8.10% | |
| ๐ณ | 68 | 7.25% | |
| ๐ | 52 | 5.54% | |
| ๐ | 51 | 5.44% | |
| ๐ | 33 | 3.52% | |
| ๐ซก | 15 | 1.60% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 0.107% | |
| ๐ฏ | 1 | 0.107% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 938 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$PRICELESS 250k -400k. good job โก๏ธ 0x7d3b5e20210a4a4a70de8252337992d7ad2d7777
๐ฅ5๐2๐ฅฐ2
Signed gemhai ๐
$PRICELESS has a solid team pushing hard. Keep an eye on it. Earn $BTC while you sleep. ๐ด 0x7d3b5e20210a4a4a70de8252337992d7ad2d7777
๐3๐ณ2๐ฅ2
Signed gemhai ๐
๐ถ๐ถ๐ถ $TART launched perfectly. Pre-sales are profitable. I'm holding and building. Can we make BSC powerful just this once? โก๏ธ 0x7AB8d02CBb51Ff7223fDe700eAaa2a91Bf750314 https://x.com/TartProtocol/
โค5๐ฅฐ2๐1
Signed gemhai ๐
๐ถ๐ถ๐ถ TartSwap is already operating on BNB Chain: a DEX, staking vault, LP farms, on-chain games, OTC desk, marketplace, and weekly governance. $TART was not created to fund a future idea. It is the long-term ecosystem token of software that is already live and operating on-chain. PancakeSwap listing: August 31 ยท 19:00 UTC 0x7AB8d02CBb51Ff7223fDe700eAaa2a91Bf750314 https://x.com/TartProtocol/status/20940826006419โฆ
๐6๐2โค1๐ณ1
Signed gemhai ๐
๐ถ๐ถ๐ถ $TART backed by an experienced team.โก๏ธ TART is a highlyโutility project and I will closely follow & support it. Now is the key time for $TART. I will keep updating its project progress. Presale: Aug 29, 18:00 UTC Official Launch: Aug 31, 19:00 UTC http://tartswap.com/presale ๐ TG: https://t.me/TartSwap ๐ Website: https://tartswap.com/
๐9๐ณ2๐1
Signed gemhai ๐
๐ชถ๐ชถ๐ชถ The $ PEPE project team is still working hard, it is the first project from https://manyu.fun. Experienced team. Https://pepeinhiod.com x: x.com/pepeinhood telegram: @pepeinhood_rh https://dexscreener.com/robinhiod/0x0d 389C0C2E7E1BEDB57FB7EB1331CD86067D85B0
โค9๐ณ1๐ฅฐ1
Signed gemhai ๐
Quick reminder on $MAME. Its tax will soon drop from 6% to 0. This is my favorite dev team. Hoping for another massive takeoff. ๐โก๏ธ https://x.com/mamebnb
โค10๐ฅ2๐ฅฐ1
Signed gemhai ๐
$GTAVI started very smoothly, and the project team worked very hard. https://dexscreener.com/solana/5btfjmmjyevet5g9rdtmjamm6wbpxws1nw79iztn9dq https://x.com/GTAVI_Network
โค11๐ณ1๐ฅฐ1
Signed gemhai ๐
i like btc ,ๆไบฎmoonโก๏ธ
โค9๐ณ4๐ฅฐ1๐ซก1
Signed gemhai ๐
๐ถ๐ถ๐ถ ATH , GEMSโก๏ธ 0xE10833dE865Ec804E29499278457B3A620DC6666 https://t.me/Ailen_BNB
๐ฅฐ9๐ฅ4๐ณ1
Signed gemhai ๐
https://t.me/gemhaiwai/2239054 CZ Bull artist just made CZ version of ็ๆฅ called ้นๆฅ https://x.com/hex_vanilla/status/2090469829396292049?s=20 0x468eea3dc021fd57748e9637d37b8528f5777777
๐ฅฐ10๐4๐ฅ1
Signed gemhai ๐
๐ถ๐ถ๐ถ Launch went smoothly, and pre-sale profits were good. 16X . Of course, do your own research.โก๏ธ 0xE10833dE865Ec804E29499278457B3A620DC6666 https://alienonchain.com https://t.me/Ailen_BNB https://x.com/Alien_OnChain
โค10๐5๐1
Signed gemhai ๐
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @haiwaitgo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@haiwaitgo edited 12 posts after it first published โ the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too โ this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 10 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โSING CALL ๐( gemhai )โ (@haiwaitgo), 16,505 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/haiwaitgo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.