Channel
@haiwai7777
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,714subscribers
+15 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003512536606 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @haiwai7777 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/haiwai7777 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:59 | 5,714 | +14 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 5,700 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 5,699 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (10 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,608 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
#柬埔寨资讯：10天内驱逐788名非法外国人，涉及21个国家和地区，315名中国籍涉诈人员被遣返 柬埔寨移民总局近日公布，在8月1日至8月10日期间，柬埔寨执法部门依法驱逐非法居留及涉嫌违法犯罪的外国人共788人，其中女性92人，涉及21个国家和地区。 被驱逐人员涉及的21个国家和地区包括：韩国、中国、中国台湾、多哥、泰国、尼日利亚、尼泊尔、孟加拉国、巴基斯坦、马来西亚、缅甸、利比里亚、越南、新加坡、斯里兰卡、加纳、印度、印度尼西亚、意大利、德国以及埃及。 其中：315名中国籍人员（包括15名女性）因涉嫌参与网络诈骗（Online Scams）犯罪活动，被柬埔寨通过特别航班遣返回中国，分别经由德崇国际机场和暹粒吴哥国际机场出境。 14名泰国籍人员（包括3名女性）因涉及网络诈骗案件，被通过戈公省柴桢国际边境口岸（Cham Yeam International Border Gate）遣返回泰国。 此外，其余被驱逐外国人还…
#网友投稿：🇻🇳胡志明“7郡”vin公寓，现在有当地警察挨家挨户敲门核对证件，刚刚从我这里走，附近证件不齐全的兄弟注意规避！
🔥 2026新规新增（9.15起执行） 新增4类限制出境情况，最高封禁3年！ 1️⃣骗证件/非法出境被拘留过 因出入境违规被行政拘留，处罚结束后，仍会被限制出境 6个月-3年 2️⃣境外违法犯罪人员 在境外做违法事、损害国家利益，回国后直接限制出境 3️⃣ 触碰技术/出口管制红线 违反进出口、技术管控规定，危害国家产业、技术安全，直接禁止出境 4️⃣办证件造假、虚假申报 申请护照、出入境材料弄虚作假，不予发证，直接限制出境资格 📢 90%人搞错的误区！ ▪️高危战乱地区不等于禁止出境 ▪️国家提示风险、劝阻前往的国家/地区，只是善意提醒，不会强制拦人 ▪️可以自主出行，所有风险自行承担！ - 💡 超重要的几点 🎈能办护照不等于可以出境。很多边控限制不影响办护照，只会在口岸登机时被拦截！ 🎈怀疑自己被边控，可向对应机关查询、申请解除 🎈 对限制出境结果不服，可依法复议、申诉 🎈单纯失信、欠钱不还，无法院边控文件，不会被限…
在园区用私人手机连过WiFi的要注意了！！！大可能会被抓
#网友曝光 赢赢娱乐 十年老赌狗第一次曝光平台，本人地址TFfnTmD4qdeMiRqdwUBezb1XVNZpHy1RCB随便去查，这只是最近复赌新搞的地址用了一个月，事件起因本人在赢赢娱乐平台连续玩了一个月，中间有输有赢一切都没问题，最近几天每天赢钱，今天充值1000输了，后面又充了1000打到6000提现被拒绝，客服告诉我需要审核48小时，我想请问哪个正规的平台需要审核48个小时？我也是在东南亚混的，什么平台我都赌过，赌了十几年输了也有上千万了，不要拿话术敷衍我没有意义，赢赢娱乐网址https ://8188 .VIP 最后说一句如果赢赢害怕别人赢钱，我觉得可以直接关盘了，下面是客服聊天记录，还有我的账号记录，
#群友爆料： 越南胡志明7郡美食街 至少有20个警察，沿街检查证件，兄弟们注意安全。
#群友爆料：柬埔寨黑心代理（小陈），温州苍南县南宋镇人。 刚开始是在西港做业务员，后面到金边一家六合彩公司做代理。代理期间，因本人爱玩包厢、吸DU，多次让公司买单，后面导致整条线的人赔付拉满。 又哄骗底下的人员，说老板不仁义、故意搞事情，又把所有人卖到八号园区三期，在里面做欧美精聊。每天不是体罚就是挨打，每天被折磨着，也不出去管。 这些可都是你自己老家人，你怎么能狠得下心呢？ 后面因为柬埔寨大扫荡，公司决定去老挝那边，又对人员进行洗脑。人员也是出于老家人的情分，才答应你过去。 可是你负责了吗？从一开始的敷衍了事，到现在的不回复。我一个亲戚家的孩子一直没有消息。 人心都是肉长的，你也有老婆孩子，而且你的孩子才刚出生没多久，你不想想她们吗？ 此人特别爱装大款，到处装自己是个有钱的大老板、大盘总。几百块人民币都要借几个人，可想而知这种人的人品有多差。 到处骗团队，到现在人在越南胡志明做盘，不知道又是谁的团队被他欺骗过去…
#国内新闻 安徽1至7月反诈战果公布 拦下9169万元现金和17.6公斤黄金 安徽省政府新闻办8月11日上午举行发布会，公布今年以来全省打击治理电信网络诈骗工作情况。 今年1至7月，安徽电诈案件数同比下降38.6%，损失同比下降44.2%。自2025年7月以来，全省已连续12个月实现电诈案件数和损失数同比双下降。 同期，安徽打击处理电诈及关联犯罪违法人员数量同比上升13.7%，依法联合惩戒2621人。警方联合银行拦截已经向诈骗团伙交付的现金9169万元、黄金17.6公斤，并向被骗群众返还资金2.8亿元。 今年以来，安徽警方已见面劝阻3.86万人，同时持续清剿出租、出借银行卡和手机卡、盗接盗打电话、跑分洗钱等涉诈黑灰产，并加强涉诈重点人员劝返管控，严防人员外溢作案。 通信行业方面，今年已核查处置涉诈异常电话卡87.9万张，协助公安机关拆除“黑盒子”设备72套，抓获涉案人员30名。
#群友投稿：老挝金三角“特外”，现在有几个大老黑正在无情殴打盘口的代理！ 起因是最近老挝抓人抓的比柬埔寨还凶，搞得公司干不下去了，都快破产了，代理工资没有给老黑们结算清楚，老黑就怒了！
🇰🇭西港百川集团警察检查
#网友反馈：马来西亚雪兰莪州巴生一家名为 Boss Club 的娱乐场所近日遭移民局展开突击检查，不知道里面情况怎么样。
🇱🇦老挝金三角特外昨天被抓100多人的的地方后续！ 现场还有一堆老缅和本地人蹲在地上，被老挝警察看守着，正在吃盒饭，中国人应该是拉去会赛了，老缅和本地人，应该是等人来接，或者是等待充值！
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @haiwai7777. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 684,314 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚新闻大事件” (@haiwai7777), 5,714 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/haiwai7777.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.