Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Хайруллин про Салават

Channel

Хайруллин про Салават

@hairullinhcsu

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

8,052subscribers

+127 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002458683057
TypeChannel
Username@hairullinhcsu
DescriptionВсе о клубе из Уфы от @Artur198989
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/hairullinhcsu

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,8898,1608,024.56 August 2026 — 7,925 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,917 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,899 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,896 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,889 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,980 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,153 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,140 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,119 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,107 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,116 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,135 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,160 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,157 subscribers27 September 2026 — 8,126 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,122 subscribers12 October 2026 — 8,109 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,101 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,100 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,083 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,080 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,063 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,043 subscribers2 November 2026 — 8,028 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,025 subscribers7 November 2026 — 8,052 subscribers8,0526 August 20267 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 93 days, net +127. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,848–8,201 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 11:508,052+27
4 Nov 2026, 21:288,025-3
2 Nov 2026, 07:378,028-15
30 Oct 2026, 15:508,043-20
27 Oct 2026, 09:598,063-17
24 Oct 2026, 00:158,080-3
20 Oct 2026, 19:518,083-17
18 Oct 2026, 04:408,100-1
15 Oct 2026, 11:588,101-8
12 Oct 2026, 16:278,109-13
5 Oct 2026, 18:018,122-4
27 Sept 2026, 19:588,126-31
18 Sept 2026, 13:598,157-3
14 Sept 2026, 04:368,160+25
10 Sept 2026, 04:188,135+19
4 Sept 2026, 18:388,116+9
31 Aug 2026, 18:138,107-12
28 Aug 2026, 12:388,119-21
25 Aug 2026, 11:038,140-13
22 Aug 2026, 20:288,153first reading

Engagement

146 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
68.1%
avg views ÷ 8,052 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,480
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
43
of 146 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held146 (12 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total235,810
Reactions total4,676
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 01:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
435
Videos
308
Links
346

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
9m 47s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

13,957 reactions across 146 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5,28037.8%
🤣1,0577.57%
💔9827.04%
👎9456.77%
😭8115.81%
❤‍🔥5844.18%
👍5714.09%
😢5343.83%
🔥5053.62%
🤡4873.49%
😁3372.41%
🤯3032.17%
💯2982.14%
😱1851.33%
🙏1521.09%
🤔1370.982%
🥰1260.903%
😍1150.824%
🥴1090.781%
💩1000.716%
22 further kinds3392.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 146 of the 146 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,957 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 146 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 146 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hairullinhcsu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 146 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 43 posts held from the last 30 days (6.98%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 13:44 UTC≈14,200 views484 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Очень много вопросов по поводу Евгения Кузнецова. Нет, в Салават он не возвращается.

👎333😢85💔23❤18🤡10👍7😭6🎉1

6 Nov 2026, 16:38 UTC≈4,510 views154 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

Победа!

🥰103🔥33❤‍🔥12❤6

6 Nov 2026, 15:55 UTC≈4,560 views76 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

Для чего в этой ситуации делать такой рискованный пас через центр?

💯71❤3🤡2

6 Nov 2026, 15:39 UTC≈4,140 views63 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

2:2 после 40 минут игры. У Вадима Шипачева было одно очко в восьми последних матчах, а сегодня уже дубль 💚

❤62🔥1

6 Nov 2026, 13:04 UTC≈4,130 views78 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Кузнецов на месте Жаровского.

❤62💔16

6 Nov 2026, 12:24 UTC≈3,820 views41 reactionsread 9 November 2026

В НХЛ готовят обмен, который перевернёт расклад в конференции. И это не тот игрок, о котором пишут все. Один клуб уже согласовал условия, второй тянет до последнего, а третья сторона вообще не в курсе, что её разыгрывают. Сделка на грани срыва - и причина не в деньгах. Кто именно, какие клубы и что может пойти не так - разбираю в канале. Чётко и без воды только здесь👇 https://t.me/+LZ0I1eT_u7Q0ZGQy

💩29🤡10❤2

6 Nov 2026, 09:15 UTC≈2,920 views10 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @tebevukhokriknutPhoto

👍Прогнозы от Админа хороши, но Вы такую железку когда-нибудь видели? ⚓️Адмирал - Барыс 🇰🇿 🚜Трактор - Ак Барс 🟢 Сегодня Игорь собрал подарочный двойник для всех новичков! Он ежедневно забирает прибыль вместе со своими подписчиками. И ведь ничего сложного, но так может не каждый! И главное: Игорь не грузит на «всё подряд». В канале - разбор, почему именно эти два матча, где он видит перевес и что может пойти не так.…

💩7❤2❤‍🔥1

5 Nov 2026, 14:57 UTC≈4,180 views141 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Жаровский играет за молодежку сегодня.

👎94💘29❤18

5 Nov 2026, 13:08 UTC≈4,500 views141 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Вот и замена.

❤100😁35💋3👎2💘1

5 Nov 2026, 11:16 UTC≈4,920 views238 reactionsread 9 November 2026

То есть, ближайший месяц Салават проведет без Алексеева, Панина, Стюарта и Щербакова.

😢185💔26😭15🤯7❤2🙏2🔥1

5 Nov 2026, 11:14 UTC≈16,500 views143 reactionsread 9 November 2026

По моей информации, защитник Салавата Юлаева Григорий Панин выбыл из-за травмы ориентировочно на месяц.

🫡92😭28❤11🤯4🤔3👍2👏1😡1

4 Nov 2026, 16:18 UTC≈4,690 views175 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Очень уверенная победа, которая нужна команде. Впрочем, не забываем и о состоянии соперника, так что не обольщаемся.

❤140❤‍🔥16💯16🤡2💋1

Showing the 12 most recent of 146 posts we hold for @hairullinhcsu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Oct 2026, 16:18 UTCAnonymous Poll1,840 voters approx.

Судейство повлияло на результат?

  1. Да34%
  2. Нет66%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 146 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Хайруллин про Салават” (@hairullinhcsu), 8,052 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hairullinhcsu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.