Channel
@hairsetting
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
214subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001825912671 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hairsetting |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hairsetting |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 214 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 215 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 216 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 216 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (14 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 634 |
| Reactions total | 84 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
91 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 84 | 92.3% | |
| custom 5237911156630232962 | 7 | 7.69% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
уход за кожей в беременность у меня сильно поменялся. на следующий день после самого блеклого положительного теста на беременность я полтора часа провела с чатом гпт в ванной проверяя составы всех косметических средств на пригодность в ближайшее время. если коротко: отложила все что содержит ретинол, салициловую кислоту и химические фильтры от солнца так как я прыщавая, это было существенное количество косметически…
❤4
эти заклепки напомнили мне ситуацию через которую прошел каждый ученик художественной школы: кнопки от мольберта в подошве. мы ими крепили ватман, но огромное количество падало вниз и все неизбежно на них наступали, а потом тихо цокали по кафелю celine забирает все моё внимание этим летом. обожаююю
❤9custom 52379111566302329622
пока погода наводит баланс и выкашивает жарой отягощающих экономику любой европейской страны стариков, я рассказываю про любимые исторические каналы на ютуб. в мае-июне я страдала херней и нашла большое количество не нудных и НЕ ТУПЫХ (типа минаева) исторических каналов на русском (на счет минаева ок если вы вообще первый раз в теме, например, мне нормально зашло про каддафи, но если вы хоть немного уже погружались…
❤10
очень красивый бренд обуви с размерами до 50го (ничего себе, приятно) ссылка конкретно на эти ботиночки кстати у них еще много красивых демисезонных вариантов. меня часто спрашивают, где брать ботинки. не проверяла, но выглядит красиво
❤4
последние пару лет и особенно интенсивно последние 2-3 месяца я думала над тем, что концепт долго функционирующей одежды для женщин плохо применим мы можем вкинуть идею что самое экологичное потребление это носить одни штаны полжизни, но есть одна объективная причина почему у моего папы это будет получаться намного лучше чем у меня тело женщин сильно меняется в следствии гормональных изменений через которые статист…
❤12custom 52379111566302329622
у меня объявление касаемо бренда ФАВ и организации моей жизни вообще весной у меня наступила беременность. событие очень для нас радостное! через какое-то время после последовал токсикоз и то, что не описывается как болезнь, но ощущается как бесконечная, максимально ограничивающая жизнь, слабость. мне пришлось остановить все планы, в которых подразумевалась моя физическая и умственная активность причина для меня оч…
❤41
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52379111566302329623
вы откуда?
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
друзья, мне стало интересно сделать гайд с одеждой по европе и европейским брендам. просто для себя, по странам (у меня когда-то был, в ноушн, давно не обновляла, в итоге уже сама не пользуюсь) вам было бы интересно?
❤4
сгрузила запомнившееся по стайлингу, ждите меня в таких же шляпках асап кстати еще один из раза в раз повторяющийся прием: штаны и верхняя одежда одного цвета и желательно материала. у нас есть как всегда только черные, но я попробую что-нибудь придумать. однотонные костюмы смотрятся очень модно и стильно сейчас
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @hairsetting. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
вы откуда?
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“hair setting” (@hairsetting), 214 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hairsetting.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.