🆕 新增骗子通报 🆘 ⚠️ 通报原因:【买卖诈骗】 👤 名称:富 🏷️ 用户名:@laicai123321 📝 被骗说明:此中介打粉一直喜欢拖款每次都是拖几天才结,这次打了粉直接不结款已读不回,快过年了又要开始杀熟了 🧾 受理编号:R20261107-0001 🕵️ 检举人:匿名 ⚖️ 如果你认为此条指认有误,请私信本机器人输入 /appeal S000039 提出申诉,受理期间本条将先暂时隐藏。 本则由社群检举、经人工审核后发布,仅供风险参考,请自行查证。 😡 遇到骗子,欢迎曝光 @haihuabaoguangbot

Channel
海华出海-全网骗子曝光频道
@haihuabaoguan
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
42,914subscribers
+21,948 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003214639081 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @haihuabaoguan |
| Description | 海华曝光仅限处理骗子信息 免费群骗子多谨防上当受骗 海华公告 @haihua_gg 海华一群 @hhchtrx 海华二群 @haihua_danbao 海华三群 @hhtrxxxx 海华供需 @haihuagongx 海华曝光 @haihuabaoguan 海华兑换 @haihuaTRXbo 海华新闻 @xinwen_News 客服华妹 @huameiok 客服华哥 @huageok 交流 资源 会员 广告 供需 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/haihuabaoguan |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 20:47 | 42,914 | -827 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 12:05 | 43,741 | -619 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 07:02 | 44,360 | -247 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:39 | 44,607 | -647 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 04:18 | 45,254 | -351 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 06:55 | 45,605 | -178 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:30 | 45,783 | -108 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 05:48 | 45,891 | -88 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 04:28 | 45,979 | -90 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 07:04 | 46,069 | -92 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:37 | 46,161 | -138 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:46 | 46,299 | -128 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 08:30 | 46,427 | -86 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:37 | 46,513 | -67 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:27 | 46,580 | -155 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 12:31 | 46,735 | -138 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:16 | 46,873 | -98 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:05 | 46,971 | -213 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:05 | 47,184 | -224 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 07:50 | 47,408 | first reading |
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 156 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.54%
- avg views ÷ 42,914 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 659
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 31 (7 August 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,977 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Nov 2026, 04:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 571
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 19
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🆕 新增骗子通报 🆘 ⚠️ 通报原因:【买卖诈骗】 👤 名称:福星 工作室(远控沟通) 🏷️ 用户名:@Fuxingxing9 💰 被骗金额:464 USD 📝 被骗说明:我在群里找人做远控搭建他说他有源码叫我找他买他给我测试了没问题的我就付款了还带了服务器结果这种人真的是没母的 📍 骗子地址:TNqSn8RcrVTjehdrWRQed7cfg18SmcbdCd 🧾 受理编号:R20261101-0001 🕵️ 检举人:匿名 ⚖️ 如果你认为此条指认有误,请私信本机器人输入 /appeal S000038 提出申诉,受理期间本条将先暂时隐藏。 本则由社群检举、经人工审核后发布,仅供风险参考,请自行查证。 😡 遇到骗子,欢迎曝光 @haihuabaoguangbot
🆕 新增骗子通报 🆘 ⚠️ 通报原因:【买卖诈骗】 👤 名称:时必达-Mary 🏷️ 用户名:@sbd66888 💰 被骗金额:969.2 USDT 📝 被骗说明:供需平台下发的广告认识的,挺长时间的原先对方有上压公群,不知道什么时候退了上压公群,没注意一直拿号 📍 骗子地址:【时必达-唯一结算地址】: TZFrCobFMziMwQVSfXwNua71Swd55js1ia 温馨提醒: 点击地址可自动复制,转账前请仔细核对。 🧾 受理编号:R20261014-0001 🕵️ 检举人:@laowukkjess ⚖️ 如果你认为此条指认有误,请私信本机器人输入 /appeal S000037 提出申诉,受理期间本条将先暂时隐藏。 本则由社群检举、经人工审核后发布,仅供风险参考,请自行查证。 😡 遇到骗子,欢迎曝光 @haihuabaoguangbot
🆕 新增骗子通报 🆘 ⚠️ 通报原因:【买卖诈骗】 👤 名称:Xc官方科技部署搭建开发 🏷️ 用户名:@Xcvip001 🌐 骗子频道:https://t.me/dajianXc001 📝 被骗说明:上来问发供应机器人怎么没反应,机器人正常运行,顺着问题问假压多少钱,这不是白痴吗,有需求的客户避雷 📍 骗子地址:@Xcvip0011 🧾 受理编号:R20261010-0001 🕵️ 检举人:@huameiok ⚖️ 如果你认为此条指认有误,请私信本机器人输入 /appeal S000036 提出申诉,受理期间本条将先暂时隐藏。 本则由社群检举、经人工审核后发布,仅供风险参考,请自行查证。 😡 遇到骗子,欢迎曝光 @haihuabaoguangbot
🆕 新增骗子通报 🆘 ⚠️ 通报原因:【其他】 👤 名称:西格玛战狼 Super 🏷️ 用户名:@LBZ666777888 💰 被骗金额:324.86 USDT 📝 被骗说明:皇冠G2709,@LBZ666777888毫无担当的秘鲁车队,自己加错账了,过了一个小时跑过来把账减了,但是我们已经给鱼放款损失我们自己担了,找他理论直接把我们的人给移出群,群里还有300多U账,我是员工打电话给我我才知道,我就上来就问他为什么把群删了,他就把我骂的直飞,难听的要命,群是没有删,是我误会了,但是群里面的帐就是拖着不结,做人做事都一点格局都没有。 🧾 受理编号:R20261006-0001 🕵️ 检举人:匿名 — ⚖️ 如果你认为此条指认有误,请私信本机器人输入 /appeal S000035 提出申诉,受理期间本条将先暂时隐藏。 本则由社群检举、经人工审核后发布,仅供风险参考,请自行查证。 😡 遇到骗子,欢迎曝光 @haihuaba
🆕 新增骗子通报 🆘 ⚠️ 通报原因:【买卖诈骗】 👤 名称:老张 🏷️ 用户名:@laozhang958 📝 被骗说明:📣新增一枚骗子团队🚨 📛 骗子昵称:老张、小六仔、小 财神 👤 骗子用户名: @laozhang958 @xiaoliuzai001 @caishen589858 💳 骗子地址:TK7K2kMxcKzJe3yyyhrX3t5aYdkHxeysoZ 💰 未结算金额:195u 📝被骗说明:此人说自己是数字集团打包料的要求后款,一开始说好的很好诚心第一, 只要不是假量就正常结账,后面答应了 发出之后找各种理由拖沓不结账,说效果不行我们也进行了补发,补发以后说好晚上进行打款,对方又找理由说在外面,过了一晚上还是没有结账,直接退群跑路了,这人也不是盘口,是负责给数字集团打单子的,找我们打完单子,找数字集团结款去了,这个团伙不知道骗了多少人了 遇到这几个赶紧拉黑 📍 骗子地址:💳 骗子地址:TK7K2kMxcKzJe3…
🆕 新增骗子通报 🆘 ⚠️ 通报原因:【其他】 👤 名称:鼎盛组长—天心 长期收车 🏷️ 用户名:@tianxin999T 📝 被骗说明:鼎盛集团员工他们集团主营跑分业务代收各种诈骗款项我认识的是一个组长这个组长当天我直接给他们公司地址上押u 后来下面车队出问题了 不能做了我让他退压u 他直接拉黑踢群,他们公司长期诈骗国内人员每天诈骗中国几百万 📍 骗子地址:TPPn8E3d5vkJmhp6keCRUMY61EYSa6hVtF 🧾 受理编号:R20261004-0001 🕵️ 检举人:匿名 — ⚖️ 如果你认为此条指认有误,请私信本机器人输入 /appeal S000033 提出申诉,受理期间本条将先暂时隐藏。 本则由社群检举、经人工审核后发布,仅供风险参考,请自行查证。 😡 遇到骗子,欢迎曝光 @haihuabaoguangbot
🆕 新增骗子通报 🆘 ⚠️ 通报原因:【買賣詐騙】 👤 名称:阿九-海外流量 🏷️ 用户名:@A_im5555 📝 被骗说明:通过广告群的付费广告看到他的,找他下单代发iMessage 一万条,因为他有两个号,期间我把需要发送的文案和数据发送给他两个号,当天我一直在催他给我测试落地,当晚给我说我另外一个号找他退款了,也没有找我核实,退款地址也不是原路退回,并且退款的地址还是他另外一个账号的收款地址,后续我找他,他说那个账号不是他的 📍 骗子地址:TQQKqBDemUV2J1QXdxAsCgrSp1dziHPfVs 🧾 受理编号:R20260923-0002 🕵️ 检举人:匿名 — ⚖️ 如果你认为此条指认有误,请私信本机器人输入 /appeal S000032 提出申诉,受理期间本条将先暂时隐藏。 本则由社群检举、经人工审核后发布,仅供风险参考,请自行查证。 😡 遇到骗子,欢迎曝光 @haihuabaoguangbot
📣新增騙子通報🆘 ⚠️原因:【買賣詐騙】 名稱:熊猫官方账号 用戶名: @xbooe 被騙說明: 在群里看见他发消息说收号,先给号他测试,测试没问题也不付款 受理編號 R20260920-0001 檢舉人:匿名 ⚖️ 如果你认为此条指认有误,请私信本机器人输入 /appeal S000030 提出申诉,受理期间本条将先暂时隐藏。 本則由社群檢舉、經人工審核後發布,僅供風險參考,請自行查證。 遇到騙子曝光 @haihuabaoguangbot
📣新增騙子通報🆘 ⚠️原因:【其他】 名稱:小猴紫 用戶名: @xhz8887 被騙金額:300 CNY 被騙說明: 偏粉!!!日本交友粉单价15,打了21个该结账的时候拉黑跑路 受理編號 R20260913-0001 檢舉人:@FDC8888886 ⚖️ 如果你认为此条指认有误,请私信本机器人输入 /appeal S000028 提出申诉,受理期间本条将先暂时隐藏。 本則由社群檢舉、經人工審核後發布,僅供風險參考,請自行查證。 遇到騙子曝光 @haihuabaoguangbot
📣新增騙子通報🆘 ⚠️原因:【買賣詐騙】 名稱:WhatsApp蓝标🚀 用戶名: @Xinxie1 騙子頻道: TEXtxRrrX7cRbtkyZj9xsQdXn8og9SpJSe 被騙說明: 对方出售蓝标号码的.付完款不给验证码. 然后又说打错地址 反正就是不发货 騙子地址:TNqdx91Ax9Fj2DkaWjQHZ8HP1DDm6C5GJT 受理編號 R20260912-0001 檢舉人:匿名 ⚖️ 如果你认为此条指认有误,请私信本机器人输入 /appeal S000027 提出申诉,受理期间本条将先暂时隐藏。 本則由社群檢舉、經人工審核後發布,僅供風險參考,請自行查證。 遇到騙子曝光 @haihuabaoguangbot
📣新增騙子通報🆘 ⚠️原因:【買賣詐騙】 名稱:花生 用戶名: @kkl66896 被騙金額:468 USDT 被騙說明: 给他打台湾色粉粉,不结账说老板被按了,最后核实款已经结给他了,不结给我,总说过几天过几天,最后跑路了,双清屏幕! 受理編號 R20260910-0001 檢舉人:@gwf668 ⚖️ 如果你认为此条指认有误,请私信本机器人输入 /appeal S000026 提出申诉,受理期间本条将先暂时隐藏。 本則由社群檢舉、經人工審核後發布,僅供風險參考,請自行查證。 遇到騙子曝光 @haihuabaoguangbot
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @haihuabaoguan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@haihuabaoguan edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 13 October 2026
- Most recent edit
- 13 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @haihuabaoguan as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 6 September 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 13 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 5 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 1
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@caishen589858 · 11 post007-全球海外数据资源
@cjaaa · 1,7311 post海华出海-官方公告频道
@haihua_gg · 18,5681 post蓝精灵专业海外数据
@lanjingling8831 · 681 postQuickRouteVPN
@laozhang958 · 11 postQuickRouteVPN
@xhz8887 · 11 postQuickRouteVPN
@xiaoliuzai001 · 11 postQuickRouteVPN
@Xinxie1 · 11 post橙子曝光频道所展示的内容仅供参考
@Xxtx90211 · 31 post🌐战神FB/TK全球粉🌐
@zhanshen88881 · 1161 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@haihuabaoguan named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 18 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“海华出海-全网骗子曝光频道” (@haihuabaoguan), 42,914 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/haihuabaoguan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.