Channel
@hafezpajohi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,964subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001216228028 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hafezpajohi |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hafezpajohi |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:17 | 2,964 | -3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 02:21 | 2,967 | -7 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 16:16 | 2,974 | +9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:37 | 2,965 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 2,969 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 2,968 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 2,972 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:19 | 2,971 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 2,970 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:55 | 2,972 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 2,978 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 2,977 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 2,977 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 3 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
33 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 22 | 66.7% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 18.2% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 15.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 December 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
چالش حافظانه در گروه حافظ پژوهی: فروغ ماه میدیدم ز بام قصر او روشن که رو از شرم آن خورشید در دیوار میآورد این بیت رو چگونه میتوان خواند که دو مفهوم متضاد از آن استنباط بشود؟ برداشتتون از این بیت چیست؟ 🎙 #محمدرضاکاکائی ۱۴ امرداد ۱۴۰۵ خورشیدی
👏3👍1
Signed محمدرضا کاکائی
فرهنگ اشعار حافظ #احمدعلی#رجایی_بخارایی تاریخ نشر: 13 اسفند، 1390 تعداد صفحه: 730 Ｃ᭄❁࿇༅═════┅─ @hafezpajohi ┄┅✿░⃟♥️❃─═༅࿇࿇༅═─
❤1
Signed محمدی R
فرهنگ اشعار حافظ دکتر #احمدعلی_رجایی_بخارایی Ｃ᭄❁࿇༅═════┅─ @hafezpajohi ┄┅✿░⃟♥️❃─═༅࿇࿇༅═─
❤1
Signed محمدی R
**شب یلدا #دکترمیلادعظیمی خانم دکتر ژاله آموزگار تأویل و تفسیری دارد از شب یلدا که خیلی دلنشین است. بخوانید: «در شب یلدا که شب کارزار روشنایی و تاریکی است، کسی نمیخوابد؛ ایرانیان گرد هم میآیند تا به نیروی عشق و نیروی مهر، به نور دل بدهند تا به جنگ سیاهترین و شومترین شب سال برود. خوراکیهای شبچره را بر سفرهی کرسی میگسترانند و تا صبح شعر میخوانند، قصه میگویند، فال حافظ میگیرند و بیدارمیمانند ت…
❤3👏1
Signed Maryam Behvandi
با حافظ حافظخوانی دکتر محمود عابدی نشست هفتم: چهارشنبه، ۲۶ آذرماه ۱۴۰۴ فرهنگستان زبان و ادب فارسی Ｃ᭄❁࿇༅═════┅─ @hafezpajohi ┄┅✿░⃟♥️❃─═༅࿇࿇༅═─
❤2
Signed Maryam Behvandi
دَردا که از آن آهویِ مُشکینِ سیهچَشم چون نافه، بسی خونِ دلم در جگر افتاد از رهگذر خاکِ سرِ کویِ شما بود هر نافه که در دستِ نسیمِ سحر افتاد مژگانِ تو تا تیغِ جهانگیر برآوُرد بس کُشتهیِ دلزنده، که بر یکدِگر افتاد شعر: #حافظ Ｃ᭄❁࿇༅═════┅─ @hafezpajohi ┄┅✿░⃟♥️❃─═༅࿇࿇༅═─
❤5
Signed Maryam Behvandi
با حافظ حافظخوانی دکتر محمود عابدی نشست پنجم: چهارشنبه، ۱۲ آذرماه ۱۴۰۴ Ｃ᭄❁࿇༅═════┅─ @hafezpajohi ┄┅✿░⃟♥️❃─═༅࿇࿇༅═─
❤4
Signed Maryam Behvandi
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed Maryam Behvandi
از بتان آن طلب ار حسن شناسی ای دل کاین کسی گفت که در علم نظر بینا بود . در این بیت محور عمودی شعر به نظر تغییر میکند. تا اینجا محور سخن ،فلک ستیزی ،خرد گرایی و باده گرایی بود .در این بیت بینش جویی دقیق بینی و عمیق بینی .محور است . چیزی را نگاه کن که ( یدرک ولا یوصف ) است . ظاهر بینی کار تو نیست آن را بجوی ،این آن دانش مخصوص می خواهد .دانش اش در دست عالمان نظر است . این( نظر )سعادت بخش است . (دارم امید بر این اشک …
Signed Maryam Behvandi
درود بر جناب نقیپور نازنین. صد البته در بیان کلی شعر و پیچیدگی زبان خیال چنین است که اشارت کردید. من خوب میدانم که بسیاری از شاعران و حتی چند غزل حافظ و ابیات بسیاری در دیوان حافظ کاملا با نگاه عرفانی سروده شدهاند. ما زمانی میتوانیم به حقیقت برسیم که: تعصب را کنار بگذاریم و هر چیزی که واقعیت است را بدون جانبداری بیان کنیم حتی اگر حقیقت نداشته باشد.( قاعدتا تفاوت واقعیت و حقیقت را میدانید) شعر حافظ را باید با تاریخ…
❤4👍1👏1
Signed Maryam Behvandi
به نظر من حافظ بیش از هر چیز شاعر زمینی است؛ شعرش از تجربه واقعی زندگی، عشق، شراب و طنز نسبت به مدعیان عرفان سرچشمه میگیرد. اما چون ذهن و زبان او سرشار از چندلایگی و ایهام است، گاه همان «می انگوری» را به سطحی عرفانی و نمادین میبرد. به همین دلیل، میتوان گفت غالبِ میها زمینیاند، و اقلیتی از آنها عرفانی یا نمادین. به همین خاطر است که حافظ همزمان در کنار خیام قرار میگیرد و در کنار عارفان هم خوانده میشود؛ آیینه…
👍2❤1
Signed Maryam Behvandi
درود بر شما جناب استاد کاکایی عزیز اصطلاحات زمینی و مجازی ، همیشه بیانگر مجازی و زمینی بودن کلام نیست . مثلا با اینکه اشعار سعدی عمدتا زمینی است ، برداشت زمینی از واژه های مجازی شعر زیر ، درست نمی نماید ، حافظ که جای خود دارد غره مشو که مرکب مردان مرد را در سنگلاخ بادیه ، پی ها بریده اند. نومید هم مباش که رندان جرعه نوش ناگه به یک ترانه به مقصد رسیده امد
❤1
Signed Maryam Behvandi
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @hafezpajohi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“حافظپژوهی (گروه دبیران ادبیات فارسی کشور)” (@hafezpajohi), 2,964 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hafezpajohi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.