Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net -1,099. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,491–19,920 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 10:38
18,656
-33
16 Sept 2026, 03:56
18,689
-35
14 Sept 2026, 08:55
18,724
-22
12 Sept 2026, 18:40
18,746
-18
10 Sept 2026, 22:19
18,764
-35
7 Sept 2026, 19:19
18,799
-41
4 Sept 2026, 22:18
18,840
-32
3 Sept 2026, 08:59
18,872
-24
2 Sept 2026, 04:01
18,896
-60
1 Sept 2026, 03:02
18,956
-44
31 Aug 2026, 02:13
19,000
-17
30 Aug 2026, 04:13
19,017
-19
29 Aug 2026, 05:07
19,036
-10
28 Aug 2026, 06:06
19,046
-17
27 Aug 2026, 02:45
19,063
-19
26 Aug 2026, 03:32
19,082
-13
25 Aug 2026, 03:55
19,095
-24
23 Aug 2026, 19:44
19,119
-35
22 Aug 2026, 04:07
19,154
-32
20 Aug 2026, 19:12
19,186
first reading
Engagement
546 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.322%
avg views ÷ 18,656 subscribers
Avg views / post
60.1
144 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
144
of 546 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 144 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held
546 (6 August 2026 – 25 August 2026)
Views total
8,649
Reactions total
16
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
31m 05s
Average length
49s
Measured directly from 38 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
94 reactions across 63 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
77
81.9%
👍
4
4.26%
🤩
4
4.26%
👏
3
3.19%
😍
3
3.19%
👌
2
2.13%
😱
1
1.06%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 70 of the 546 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 546 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚡️اینجا بود که جرقهٔ دورهی «الاسرار الاذکار» در ذهن من خورد👌👌
من نخواستم یک دورهٔ آموزشیِ معمولی بسازم✋️❌️
🤝من خواستم یک «سنگرِ آگاهی» بنا کنم❗️❗️❗️
👇سنگری که در آن، مخاطب نه با وعدههایِ پوچِ مالی، ✋️
👌بلکه با «سوادِ معنوی» مسلح شود❗️❗️❗️
📌این دوره، محصولِ آن ماهها بیخوابی و پژوهش است.👌👌
📌این دوره، عصارهٔ دقیقترین بررسیهای من رویِ متون است.👌👌
📌من این مسیر را رفتم تا شما مجبور نباشید دوباره آن را طی کنید؛…
✋️من نمیخواستم فقط یک سری اطلاعاتِ پراکنده جمع کنم📍📍
من بهدنبالِ یک «متدولوژی» بودم؛
❌️یک فیلتر که بتواند هر ادعایی را غربال کند❗️❗️❗️
📌ماهها وقت صرف کردم تا «اصولِ فهمِ ادعیه» را استخراج کنم. 👌
اینکه چه چیزی مأثور است؟
چه چیزی توصیهٔ شخصیِ یک عالم بوده است؟
و چه چیزی اساساً از دین نیست؟
❌️من این فیلتر را برای خودم ساختم،
و حالا حس کردم وظیفه دارم آن را با شما به اشتراک بگذارم❗️❗️❗️
چون دانستنِ این اصول،
ق…
❌️سختترین بخشِ کارِ من، نقدِ آن چیزی بود که دههها به عنوانِ «ذکرِ مجرب» به خوردِ مردم داده بودند❗️❗️❗️
بسیاری از اینها، در هیچ منبعِ معتبری نبودند.
فقط ادعا بودند.⚠️
من باید این ادعاها را با تیغِ «سندشناسی» جراحی میکردم. ⚡️🔥
روزها،
هفتهها و
ماهها طول کشید تا یاد بگیرم چطور سره را از ناسره تشخیص دهم❗️❗️❗️
❌️هر بار که به یک «نسخهٔ ساختگی» برمیخوردم،
⚡️دردی عمیق در جانم مینشست؛ 📍
چون میدانستم یک نفرِ دیگر،
ب…
غرق شدن در اقیانوسِ منابع 🌊
کارِ من از آنجایی شروع شد که کتابخانهها را زیر و رو کردم❗️❗️❗️❗️
❌️نه کتابهایِ زرد و بینامونشانِ فضایِ مجازی، ✋️
✔️بلکه متونِ دستاولِ حدیثی و کلامیمان👌
از «کافی» شریف گرفته
تا آثارِ متقدمان❗️❗️❗️
دیدنِ آنهمه عظمت،
آنهمه دقّت و
آنهمه حکمتِ نهفته در کلامِ اهلبیت(ع)،🌬 در تضادِ کامل با آن چیزی بود که در گوشه و کنارِ دنیایِ مدرن میدیدم.✋️✋️
من دیدم که چقدر فاصله افتاده است.
⚠️ف…
🔐ماهها پیش، وقتی دیدم چگونه جامعهای که تشنهی آرامش است،
در باتلاقِ دستوراتِ بیسند و نسخههایِ «فوری» گرفتار شده،
شبهای زیادی خواب نداشتم❗️❗️❗️
🔺من شاهد بودم که چطور عزیزانمان،
با قلبی پاک و نیتِ خیر،
به جایِ پناه بردن به معارفِ اصیل،
به بازیچهٔ دلالانِ «ذکر» تبدیل شدهاند.....
مدام از خودم میپرسیدم:
«آیا راهی جز این سردرگمی وجود ندارد؟»
⚠️این سردرگمیِ جمعی،
مرا به این فکر انداخت که باید تغییری ایجاد کنم✋…
📌اگه این چند روز
همراه ما بودی
و تو هم از تکتیک های دروغینی که به اسم خدا و پیغمبر به خوردت داده اند کلافه ای ❗️
و دلت میخواهد بدانی که دین واقعی و توسل حقیقی
چگونه پیدا میشود
بنویس راهنمایی تا راه آن را بتو نشان دهیم👇👇👇👇
@mohadesehoseini
@mohadesehoseini
خرافات، ایمان را از ریشه میخشکاند
و جایِ آن، خیالات و اوهام میکارد🔥❌️
م📌ا باید مسئولانه از ایمانمان محافظت کنیم.❗️❗️
بندگی، مسئولیت دارد؛
و مسئولیتِ اول، «شناختِ صحیح» است. 🕯️
✅هزینهٔ سنگینِ خرافهگرایی 🥀
خرافهگرایی، فقط «نادرست» نیست؛ ✋️
📌بلکه «تخر یبگر» است❗️❗️❗️
اعتمادِ مردم را به امرِ مقدس از بین میبرد.
🔴کسی که صد بار یک ذکرِ بیسند را گفته
و هیچ گشایشی ندیده،
دیگر به سراغِ دعا و توسلِ واقعی هم نمیرود. ❗️❗️
Showing the 12 most recent of 546 posts we hold for @hadishossainee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
بدون سواد معنوی ما هر لحظه دچار شک و کفر میشیم!20%
الان آخر زمانه سواد معنوی نداشته باشیم ایمانمون کامل نیست ✔️40%
The shares total 160%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
تو هم شده که از کانال یا پیجی دعا یا ذکری بگیری که تضمین بده چند روزه نتیجه میگیری اما نتیجه نگرفتی که هیچ حتی به خودتم شک کردی نکنه من اشتباه انجام دادم ❗️
یا اصلا اعتقاداتم ضعیف تر از قبل شد چون با امید به ذکر شروع کردی ولی خبری نشد ❗️
اگه بدونم کسی هست دلیلش رو میدونه دلم میخواد بیاد راه حلشونو به من بگه14%
از کجا میشه دلیل این اتفاقات بد تو خونه رو پیدا کرد؟57%
The shares total 143%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 546 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 25 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
قبیله هم فرکانسی ها 💜🌱🤌🏻 @Royataherkhanii · 23,637 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 18 September 2026
Mahya zinati | محیا زینتی @mahyaznt · 32,659 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“محدثه حسینی” (@hadishossainee), 18,656 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hadishossainee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.