Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Hadi derakhshan forex | هادی درخشان فارکس

Channel

Hadi derakhshan forex | هادی درخشان فارکس

@hadiderakhshanfx

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,898subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002283601849
TypeChannel
Username@hadiderakhshanfx
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hadiderakhshanfx

Growth

1,8921,9011,896.512 August 2026 — 1,900 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,901 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,897 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,892 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,898 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,896 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,898 subscribers1,89812 August 20261 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 20 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,891–1,902 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 02:061,898+2
28 Aug 2026, 22:041,896-2
23 Aug 2026, 02:451,898+6
19 Aug 2026, 18:321,892-5
16 Aug 2026, 17:131,897-4
13 Aug 2026, 02:461,901+1
12 Aug 2026, 04:451,900first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.4%
avg views ÷ 1,898 subscribers
Avg views / post
520
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held20 (7 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total10,405
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC334 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

طلا موقت یه پایین داد ولی دوباره برگشت بالا دقت کنید که کادر مقاومتی را اگر به بالا رد کنه یه روند شارپ افزایشی می سازه و دیدکاهشی را کاملا از بین می بره شکست همین کادر هم می شه ستاپ بای

11 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC375 viewsread 12 August 2026

درضمن برای همه کاربران یک هفته دیگه اکسپرت را رایگان تمدید کردیم یعنی تا الان ۱۴ روز رایگان فعلا می تونید همه رایگان بهرمند بشید از این خدمات عالی

11 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC372 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

اخرین تحلیل و سیگنال طلا به عقیده من اینه الان دقیق ترش در اکسپرت اپلود کردم که می تونید مستقیم روی متاتریدرتون داشته باشیدش

11 Aug 2026, 05:44 UTC421 viewsread 12 August 2026

می‌پرسید سیگنال طلا کجا بود ؟ اکسپرت نصب کن روی متاتریدرت ، تحلیل ها و سیگنال ها مستقیم می یاد روی متاتریدرت https://iranibourse.com/اکسپرت-ایرانی-بورس/

11 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC421 viewsread 12 August 2026

طلا هم ۴۵۰ پیپ بالا رفت با سیگنالمون

10 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC520 viewsread 12 August 2026

نفت فعلا ۲۰۰ پیپ بالا رفته روی همین سیگنال

10 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC578 viewsread 12 August 2026

هیچ آشنایی ندارم : توضیحی بدم خدمت دوستانی که آشنایی نداره یا برداشت اشتباهی دارن مادر و پدر آلپاری یکی از بزرگ ترین بروکر های دنیاست ، بروکر FXTM این بروکر یه زمانی با ایرانی ها کار می کرد ولی به دلیل تحریم ها خدماتش را به ایرانی ها متوقف کرد و همه کلاینت هاش را داد به پسرشون یعنی آلپاری این اتفاق حدودا اگر اشتباه نکنم ۶ ، ۷ سال قبل افتاد خود الپاری الان ۲۵ ساله داره کار می کنه از نظر امنیت من در بین کارگزاری

10 Aug 2026, 07:25 UTC538 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

سیگنال نفت نفت دقیقا مو به مو داره مثل چیزی که هفته های قبل انتظار داشتیم پیش میره من انتظار دارم اگر امروز بتونه این سقف خط گردن سبز که در شکل کشیدم را به بالا رد کنه در پولبکش می تونیم وارد بای بشیم ستاپ بزرگ و سنگینه و کار هر کسی نیست روی این ستاپ ها ترید کنه پس اول خودتون و حسابتون را بشناسید و بعد استفاده کنید

9 Aug 2026, 08:54 UTC586 viewsread 12 August 2026

خواهشی که دارم در این نظرسنجی شرکت کنید سپاسگزارم

9 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC575 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

در صورتی که استفاده نمی کنید ، دلیلش را کدام گزینه می بینید ؟

  1. کارگزاری مطمئنی نیست29%
  2. تغییر در کندل دارد21%
  3. واریز و برداشت هاش سریع نیست7%
  4. پشتیبانی خوبی ندارد10%
  5. اسپرت و کمیسیون بالایی دارد22%
  6. کارگزاری های جدید را ترجیح می دهم15%
  7. هیچ کدام ، آشنایی با این کارگزاری ندارم31%

The shares total 135%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hadiderakhshanfx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTCAnonymous Poll108 voters

در صورتی که استفاده نمی کنید ، دلیلش را کدام گزینه می بینید ؟

  1. کارگزاری مطمئنی نیست29%
  2. تغییر در کندل دارد21%
  3. واریز و برداشت هاش سریع نیست7%
  4. پشتیبانی خوبی ندارد10%
  5. اسپرت و کمیسیون بالایی دارد22%
  6. کارگزاری های جدید را ترجیح می دهم15%
  7. هیچ کدام ، آشنایی با این کارگزاری ندارم31%

The shares total 135%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTCAnonymous Poll133 voters

آیا از کارگزاری الپاری استفاده می کنید ؟

  1. بله 👍39%
  2. خیر 👎62%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 262,081 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hadi derakhshan forex | هادی درخشان فارکس” (@hadiderakhshanfx), 1,898 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hadiderakhshanfx.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.