DM "Mentor" on wa.me/+918607821169 for Registration
❤1

Channel
@hackersking101
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,475subscribers
-238 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001220192219 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hackersking101 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hackersking101 |
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Oct 2026, 17:39 | 7,475 | -6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 21:39 | 7,481 | -9 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 21:49 | 7,490 | -11 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 10:29 | 7,501 | -4 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 20:39 | 7,505 | -8 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 22:57 | 7,513 | -14 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 12:01 | 7,527 | -19 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 7,546 | -25 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 10:17 | 7,571 | -4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 7,575 | -8 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 7,583 | -23 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 17:15 | 7,606 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:08 | 7,613 | -15 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 7,628 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:59 | 7,636 | -13 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 7,649 | -8 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 7,657 | -17 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 7,674 | -14 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 7,688 | -12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 7,700 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 1 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
116 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 105 | 90.5% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 5.17% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 1.72% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.72% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.862% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 1 November 2025 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
DM "Mentor" on wa.me/+918607821169 for Registration
❤1
Posted without readable text
❤4👏1
SploitScan 🔍 Find Latest CVE Exploits & Security Guides Discover the latest CVEs, working exploits, and step-by-step reference guides with SploitScan. Stay ahead in cybersecurity with real-time vulnerability insights and powerful tools for ethical hackers and security researchers. 🚀 watch now on youtube: https://yt.openinapp.co/9fm29
❤6
🚨 Telegram EVIL-DROPPER Alert! New CVE-2025-1450 exploit uses Telegram to deliver malware via files. One click = system compromise Stay alert. Don’t open unknown files. 🛡 WATCH NOW:https://yt.openinapp.co/w0rxuqd
❤3😱1
🚨 New Video Uploaded! Learn how the open-source tool GoPhish is used for phishing awareness and employee cybersecurity training. In this video, I’ve demonstrated ethical social engineering concepts for educational purposes only 🔐 🎥 Watch now and improve your cybersecurity knowledge! Click Here: https://yt.openinapp.co/orcb8 #CyberSecurity #EthicalHacking #GoPhish #Hackersking
❤1
Watch Now: https://yt.openinapp.co/4bwfy
I'll post daily 2 lecture ✅
❤8
🚨 Big Update! I’ve just dropped my complete premium course “Cybersecurity Essentials for Aspiring Ethical Hackers” for FREE on YouTube 🔥 If you want to start your journey in ethical hacking, cybersecurity, Kali Linux, and real-world skills — this is for you. 🎯 Beginner → Advanced 💻 Practical + Easy to Understand 💸 100% Free (limited time) Watch here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLPlNbQYebeD1fYMGRfx34z7U…
❤17
Old Account Disabled 🕊️ Let's Start Again, Here is my new account make sure to follow https://www.instagram.com/ihackersking
❤4👍1
🔥 Top Free AI Tools Every Hacker Must Know in 2026🔥 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🧠 PART 1 – AI Pentesting Foundations ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔗 https://www.hacktricks.ai AI-powered hacking knowledge base 🔗 https://github.com/hexsecteam/HexSecGPT Offensive AI assistant framework 🔗 https://github.com/hexsecteam/worm-gpt Autonomous offensive AI logic ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚔️ PART 2 – Advanced Pentesting & Automation ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━…
❤13
Top Mobile Pentest Tools 📱🛠 MobSF Automated static & dynamic mobile app analysis https://github.com/MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF Frida Runtime instrumentation and live app hooking https://github.com/frida/frida Objection Frida-based mobile exploration toolkit https://github.com/sensepost/objection mitmproxy Intercept and inspect HTTPS traffic https://github.com/mitmproxy/mitmproxy apk-mitm Patch APKs fo…
❤4
1. http://ChatGPT.com (solve any problem) 2. http://PicWish.com (remove backgrounds) 3. http://Perplexity.ai (research anything) 4. http://Suno.ai (compose music) 5. http://Canva.com (design graphics) 6. http://ElevenLabs.io (clone voices) 7. http://Grammarly.com (perfect writing) 8. http://Luma.ai (create 3D models) 9. http://RecCloud.com (summarize YouTube) 10. http://Runway.ml (edit videos) 11. http://Descript.com…
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @hackersking101. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hackersking” (@hackersking101), 7,475 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hackersking101.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.