Channel
@haccp_audit_com
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,364subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002289033197 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @haccp_audit_com |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/haccp_audit_com |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 1,364 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 1,368 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:19 | 1,369 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 1,369 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 29 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (29 April 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 101 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 22:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
28 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 35.7% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 21.4% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 21.4% | |
| 🙈 | 4 | 14.3% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Пишите АУДИТ в комментариях — проведем для вас бесплатный 40-минутный экспресс-аудит в Zoom. Разберём ваше предприятие, покажу основные нарушения, объясню реальные риски и расскажу, что нужно исправить в первую очередь👇🏻
❤1
🎁 Друзья, в канале МАКС уже ждёт целая папка полезных материалов для предприятий общепита и пищевых производств Забирайте бесплатно ⤵️ 📄 Инструкция по проверкам Роспотребнадзора 📘 Гайд «СанПиН простыми словами» 🚨 Чек-лист «5 фатальных ошибок, из-за которых закрывают 90% заведений» 🔍 Гайд «Топ-5 уязвимых мест на кухне» 💸 Памятка «Самые распространённые штрафы в общепите» 🧼 Инструкция «Правила личной гигиены персонал…
❤1
Во время аудитов на предприятиях питания мы заглядываем в каждый холодильник. 🔴Часто видим такую картину. На 3-х фото - минимум 5 нарушений. Что интересно: собственник часто даже не догадывается, что продукты хранятся в таком состоянии, зачастую просроченные. ПС: какие нарушения видите на фото?
🙈4🙏4
«У нас все идеально. Мы готовы к любой проверке». Именно так собственник встретил нас на аудите. Визуально действительно все выглядело хорошо: ✔️ чистое производство, ✔️ сотрудники в форме, ✔️ рабочие журналы, ✔️ активный цех. ◾️Но потом мы открыли холодильник. И стало понятно: предприятие работает не по системе безопасности, а “на опыте сотрудников”. ◾️Что мы увидели: — полуфабрикаты без маркировки, — отсутстви…
❤2👍1🔥1
⚡️ СанПиН 2027: готовая еда, новые правила и рынок, который уже меняется Рынок готовой еды растёт стремительно и уже напрямую конкурирует с классическим общепитом. 📊 2016 — 92,4 млрд 📊 2025 — около 400 млрд Люди всё чаще выбирают готовую еду в ритейле вместо похода в кафе и рестораны. Рынок готовой еды находится в переходной зоне. Формально санитарные требования есть, но: — нет единого детального стандарта именно п…
❤2🔥1
Вы можете быть уверены, что у вас “все нормально”. Пока не начинается аудит. За последние месяцы я увидела много предприятий, где собственники были абсолютно спокойны: — журналы есть, — сотрудники обучены, — документы лежат в папках, — кухня работает. Но реальная картина вскрывалась за первые 20–30 минут. И вот 5 признаков, что есть проблемы: 1️⃣Журналы заполняются “когда вспомнили” Особенно температурные. 2️⃣Со…
❤1🔥1🙏1
❓Зачем на пищевых предприятиях и в общепите нужны контрольные термометры, если на холодильнике есть дисплей? И главное — где это прописано в санитарных требованиях и технических регламентах? 👀 🎧 Рассказала в подкасте: ✔️ почему показания дисплея не всегда отражают реальную температуру внутри оборудования ✔️ в каких случаях предприятие может попасть в зону риска даже при «нормальных» показателях ✔️ какие требования …
❤1🔥1🙏1
✔️ХАССП для производства БАДОВ. Такое тоже делаем 🔥 ______________ Работаем по всей России, Армении и Казахстане. Ну и конечно ХАССП для: 📍ресторанов, кафе, пиццерий, столовых, баров 📍доставки еды, фуд-кортов, кофеен 📍мясных, рыбных, молочных, хлебобулочных производств, кондитерских, пекарен, производна сыра 📍детских и медицинских учреждений. 💵Вернем деньги, если не пройдёте проверку. 📤Напишите нашему специалист…
❤2🔥2👍1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @haccp_audit_com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ХАССП. АУДИТ” (@haccp_audit_com), 1,364 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/haccp_audit_com.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.