Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Haber Noktası

Channel

Haber Noktası

@habersan

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

27,218subscribers

-2,469 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003220289092
TypeChannel
Username@habersan
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/habersan

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 6 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@bpthaber/957317 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC@habersan/23743 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC1.00under a minute
@bpthaber/957377 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC@habersan/23749 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC1.00under a minute
@bpthaber/957437 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC@habersan/23755 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC1.00under a minute
@bpthaber/957457 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC@habersan/23757 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC1.00under a minute
@habersan/23761 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC@bpthaber/957497 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC1.00under a minute
@bpthaber/957557 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTC@habersan/23767 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@bpthaber8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@bpthaber (8–0)
@haber_son_dakikam7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (5–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 10 of the 10 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 10 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 6, the earliest publisher we hold is @haber_son_dakikam. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 5 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

27,21829,68728,452.57 August 2026 — 29,687 subscribers8 August 2026 — 29,624 subscribers9 August 2026 — 29,574 subscribers10 August 2026 — 29,499 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29,408 subscribers12 August 2026 — 29,335 subscribers14 August 2026 — 29,259 subscribers15 August 2026 — 29,180 subscribers16 August 2026 — 29,097 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28,996 subscribers18 August 2026 — 28,939 subscribers19 August 2026 — 28,869 subscribers20 August 2026 — 28,783 subscribers22 August 2026 — 28,699 subscribers24 August 2026 — 28,605 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28,556 subscribers26 August 2026 — 28,497 subscribers27 August 2026 — 28,436 subscribers28 August 2026 — 28,389 subscribers29 August 2026 — 28,336 subscribers29 August 2026 — 28,274 subscribers30 August 2026 — 28,212 subscribers31 August 2026 — 28,158 subscribers1 September 2026 — 28,099 subscribers3 September 2026 — 28,026 subscribers4 September 2026 — 27,935 subscribers7 September 2026 — 27,733 subscribers10 September 2026 — 27,581 subscribers12 September 2026 — 27,474 subscribers14 September 2026 — 27,387 subscribers16 September 2026 — 27,321 subscribers18 September 2026 — 27,218 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 41 days, net -2,469. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,848–30,057 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 07:0027,218-103
16 Sept 2026, 03:1927,321-66
14 Sept 2026, 09:4127,387-87
12 Sept 2026, 17:5827,474-107
10 Sept 2026, 17:2227,581-152
7 Sept 2026, 15:3727,733-202
4 Sept 2026, 14:5727,935-91
3 Sept 2026, 00:1628,026-73
1 Sept 2026, 23:3328,099-59
31 Aug 2026, 23:5828,158-54
30 Aug 2026, 22:3328,212-62
29 Aug 2026, 23:3728,274-62
29 Aug 2026, 01:5828,336-53
28 Aug 2026, 01:1828,389-47
27 Aug 2026, 02:2428,436-61
26 Aug 2026, 04:5528,497-59
25 Aug 2026, 05:5328,556-49
24 Aug 2026, 07:0528,605-94
22 Aug 2026, 12:4728,699-84
20 Aug 2026, 23:4728,783first reading

Engagement

922 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.011%
avg views ÷ 27,218 subscribers
Avg views / post
3.0
249 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
249
of 922 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held922 (7 August 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total744
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 13:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈23,900
Videos
≈3,370
Links
≈2,090

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 35m
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 129 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 922 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 922 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Sept 2026, 13:17 UTC1 viewsread 30 September 2026
Photo

İstanbul Cumhuriyet Başsavcılığı, MHK Başkanı ve bazı şüpheliler hakkında yürütülen soruşturma kapsamında TFF Riva Tesisleri’ndeki VAR odası ile VAR kayıtlarında herhangi bir inceleme yapılmadığını açıkladı.

30 Sept 2026, 13:06 UTC1 viewsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Bulgaristan takımı Botev Plovdiv'in 53 yaşındaki başkanı Filipov, başından vurularak öldürüldü.

30 Sept 2026, 12:43 UTC1 viewsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Norveç Varlık Fonu'nun, Türkiye'de fon soruşturmasına konu olan hisselerde 9,9 milyar liralık yatırımı olduğu ortaya çıktı. Fonun aldığı hisseler: — Tera Yatırım — Astor Enerji — Destek Finans Faktoring — Odine Solutions

30 Sept 2026, 12:35 UTC2 viewsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Hakkari'de kuraklık nedeniyle çamurda mahsur kalan balıklar kurtarıldı. — Tankerlerle bölgeye su taşındı. — Riskli bölgelerdeki balıklar toplanarak uygun su kaynaklarına bırakıldı.

30 Sept 2026, 12:18 UTC2 viewsread 30 September 2026
Photo

İngiltere, Avrupa Birliği'ne yeniden katılmayı düşünüyor. — Başbakan Burnham: "Ayrılmak faydadan çok zarar verdi."

30 Sept 2026, 12:09 UTC3 viewsread 30 September 2026
Photo

100 yılı aşkın sürenin ardından ilk kez yeni bir penguen türü keşfedildi. — "Pygoscelis kerguelensis" adı verilen tür, Hint Okyanusu'ndaki Kerguelen Adaları'nda yaşıyor.

30 Sept 2026, 12:00 UTC3 viewsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Koleksiyonluk bir Pikachu kartı 8.400.000 dolara satıldı. — Dünya çapında yalnızca 100 adet bulunduğu bilinen kart, bugüne kadar açık artırmaya çıkan en pahalı ikinci Pokémon kartı oldu.

30 Sept 2026, 11:32 UTC4 viewsread 30 September 2026
Photo

SON DAKİKA: Fon soruşturmasında 5. dalga operasyon yapıldı. — 34 şüpheli hakkında gözaltı kararı verildi. Operasyonlarla birlikte dosya kapsamında hakkında işlem yapılan şüpheli sayısı 217’ye, tutuklu sayısı ise 56’ya yükseldi. — Spekülatif ve manipülatif işlemlerle olağan dışı kazanç sağlandığı değerlendirilen 26 hisse senedi, ilgili hesaplar ve para hareketleri incelemeye alındı. — Suçtan elde edildiği belirlene…

30 Sept 2026, 11:23 UTC3 viewsread 30 September 2026
Video

İstanbul'da Rusya-Ukrayna savaşından kaldığı değerlendirilen insansız hava aracına ait bir kalıntı, kontrollü olarak patlatıldı.

30 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTC2 viewsread 30 September 2026
Video

İstanbul Boğazı, yağışların ardından turkuaz renge büründü.

30 Sept 2026, 10:39 UTC2 viewsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Afra Saraçoğlu'nun uyuşturucu testi pozitif çıktı. — Saçında kokain tespit edildi. (Burak Doğan)

30 Sept 2026, 10:09 UTC2 viewsread 30 September 2026
Photo

SON DAKİKA | Dilan Polat, gözaltına alındı. Gerekçe: Cumhurbaşkanına hakaret.

Showing the 12 most recent of 922 posts we hold for @habersan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Haber Noktası” (@habersan), 27,218 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/habersan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.