Channel
@gzpy958
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,019subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 1 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002636587535 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gzpy958 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 1 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gzpy958 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 23:42 | 1,019 | +18 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 13:22 | 1,001 | no change |
| 1 Oct 2026, 12:47 | 1,001 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 September 2026 – 1 October 2026) |
| Views total | 10,047 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Oct 2026, 13:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 September 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【验证时间】: 9.30号 【验证留名】: N B南北 【技师牌类】: S牌技师 【出击价格】: 898 【联系方式】: 预约部长 可乐 @uuiop8 【会所位置】: 白云 【身材评价】: 比较瘦 【服务过程】: 看群里发的几个老师都挺不错的，刚好有假从深圳过来体验一下！超级堵车，堵的鸡儿都软了。门店可以比较大型比深圳好很多，深圳基本都是小会所！部长挺热情接待。给我安排妹子的时候很耐心看了好几个都没说什么，最后挑了个小妹妹。看着像20出头那样实际问了妹妹才知道26了看着很像那种学生妹，吊带背心加个短裙妥妥的纯欲风。妹子好娇小单手就把她抱起来了，两腿紧紧夹住我的腰怕我把她给摔倒。被这样一夹瞬间来了感觉，妹子看着羞涩实际开放的很。舌吻的时候手就开始伸张鸟儿了，做的美甲有点长之间有意无意的触碰身上酥麻。估计妹妹就一米五这样特别瘦腰很细，舌完就把她衣服给脱了皮肤比较白没纹身这点比较喜欢。胸很小估计A了奶头粉粉的…
御姐的风情让你流连忘返
国庆正常营业哦，早班双马尾妹妹在哈可约
S牌姐妹花，可双飞哦体验被掏空的感觉😎
05年的小姐姐❤️今日可约
❤1
晚班老师来上班喽，晚班红牌约起来
嫩妹苏苏可约哦😎甜美的外表下一颗会玩的心❤️
【验证时间】: 9月26号 【验证留名】: vxhxjkp 【技师牌类】: S牌技师 【出击价格】: 八百多 【联系方式】: 预约部长 可乐 @uuiop8 【会所位置】: 白云区那边 【身材评价】: 比较可以喜欢 【服务过程】:跟朋友一起去的，到了门口有点尴尬我朋友说去过了！之前找别的部长安排的优惠了80挺心动就去了.结果S牌好老玩的不开心朋友一直劝我走。然后这个部长又一直保证不会老的想着来都来了还开了一个半小时车先进去看看吧，不行再跑路。进去之后报了个预约号，就带我们去洗澡！我朋友估计是被整怕了一直叫我走。后面洗完部长给我们安排这次两个人都选的s牌，我朋友算比较挑的了看了一个直接起钟。我虽然不挑但是囊中羞涩每一分都得花在刀刃上看了好几个最终选择10号！这个身材才配得上这个价格，老师的身材是那种有点肉感的胸非常大圆润！进去之后老师特别主动，先会调情一会等兄弟硬了再开始服务。灯光也还行看得见身体部位，…
【验证时间】: 9-28。 【验证留名】: Tms 【技师牌类】: A牌技师 【出击价格】: 798 【联系方式】: 预约部长 可乐 @uuiop8 【会所位置】: 三元里 【身材评价】: b胸小了点，但是没有科技感 【服务过程】: 联系了可乐🥤部长了解服务内容，得到部长的强烈肯定后也是闪现出击距离不远很快就抵达，进门报预留号后就去简单的收拾了一会心里面已经迫不及待要长长眼了进房稍坐了一会部长就安排了一位颜值方面是嫩妹级别的小妹妹，身材方面很不错很OK胸就有点小没达到预期但也很不错了本人比较吃颜值，随后就进行主题，音乐声响起此时紧贴她的后背跟着音乐节奏一起摇摆搂着她的腰，这腰真的细有这么完美的颜值身材，胸没这么大也不纠结了，转过身就让我躺在床上，然后就是说到服务，随后缓缓往我身上靠近，亲我脸颊两边对着耳朵呼气开始舔舐全身，灵活的舌头在身上舞蹈着缓缓向下然后一边含住我的二弟一会又舔蛋很会找敏感点拿捏…
A牌小姐姐除了有性价比以外，身材也是棒棒哒
早班第一个来的红牌老师，嘉嘉可约头钟
有位置，有位置😋
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gzpy958. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“广州莞式97 出击报告🥇” (@gzpy958), 1,019 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gzpy958.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.