Channel
@gzmdh2
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
276subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003889214915 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gzmdh2 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 8 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gzmdh2 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 276 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 277 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 May 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,764 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【采花频道】：https://t.me/gzmdh1/897 【牡丹花群】：https://t.me/gzmdh 【艺 名】：丸子 【联系方式】: @xiaowanziy1 【位 置】：天河区 【采花费用】：600p（加一百车费） 【验证留名】：ufo 【验证时间】：7.30 【推荐程度】：10 【服务类型】：10 【特 点】：服务很认真 【报告细节】：今天闲来无事在榜上找个老师出击，正好想到了前几天在榜上看见的丸子老师，于是就和老师约好了时间----接到老师后，仔细打量了一下老师发现身材真的很好，和照片身材几乎无二，随后开始，老师虽然不是专业的但是口的很认真，差点把持不住，口了一会我直接翻身，让老师躺着，我在上面，过了一会，老师女上紧接着123带着老师阵阵娇喘和内心的一阵空虚～出货
【采花频道】：https://t.me/gzmdh1/811 【牡丹花群】：https://t.me/gzmdh 【艺 名】：西西 【联系方式】: DAD8808 【位 置】：白云区 【采花费用】：900pp 【验证留名】：匿名 【验证时间】：7.24 【推荐程度】：推荐 【服务类型】：不错 【特 点】：好停车、课室环境好 【报告细节】： 在群里看了很久，预约好时间，位置好找，离地铁不远，遥控上楼，一开门绝了漂亮的老师，老师温柔，服务也特别好，进门就是拿水，又拿拖鞋，不墨迹，马上就交了水费，马上开始洗澡，老师洗的很温柔，又仔细，165身高，就是小小a罩🐻，有点可惜，洗后又体验了一下残废的自己，上下其手摸弟弟，过程真的是既放松又刺激，一直有一种酥麻痒痒的，等弟弟特别硬的时候，开始开干，传教士开局，可惜没有体验女上，女上老师疼，我比较邻相惜玉，就不女上了，换姿势后入，这我就很爽了，老师的节奏…
【采花频道】：https://t.me/gzmdh1/811 【牡丹花群】：https://t.me/gzmdh 【艺 名】：西西 【联系方式】: @DAD8806 【位 置】：白云区 【采花费用】：500p（半价） 【验证留名】：x 【验证时间】：7.22 【推荐程度】：10 【服务类型】：10 【特 点】：刚下海不久，很紧，性格开朗 【报告细节】：正好中了老师半价，约好时间，看了下地点离我很近刚好让老师上门了，聊了会天然后洗澡，口硬了直接带套冲锋，是真的紧，差点进不去，进去了也撑不住几回合，马上败下阵来。可冲
【采花频道】：https://t.me/gzmdh1/811 【牡丹花群】：https://t.me/gzmdh 【艺 名】：西西 【联系方式】: @DAD8806 【位 置】：白云区 【采花费用】：900pp（半价p+p） 【验证留名】：最爱白虎bbw 【验证时间】：7.21 【推荐程度】：10分 【服务类型】：好 【特 点】：课室干净，老师性格很好 【报告细节】：按照老师指引来到地点，看到的就是一个小小个的。老师很热情见面先聊了会天，老师也不会催促。后面唠嗑十来分钟，交了水费洗澡然后就是开始干活。老师口的不是很熟练，老师说她智齿发炎了，可能是这个原因，后面带雨伞开干，我嘞个逗，紧，太紧了。一开始进都进不去，进去之后也是夹的慌，来之前看别的师兄的报告说紧，我还不信，现在亲身体验过才知道是真的紧。后面123出水，和老师继续唠嗑。而后继续开始第二发，美美出水，洗澡走人。感觉非常不错，会…
【采花频道】：https://t.me/gzmdh1/261 【牡丹花群】：https://t.me/gzmdh 【艺 名】：广佛卡卡 【联系方式】: @Zh77688 【位 置】：智慧城 【采花费用】：800p 【验证留名】：晴天 【验证时间】：7.8 【推荐程度】：推荐 【服务类型】：榜上看到老师资料很是喜欢，立马约了个时间付了定金，忙完手上的工作就赶往老师给的地址，亲自接上楼后开门的一瞬间真的太幸福了，老师确实很年轻，穿着很可爱的裙子，聊了一会就交了水费就一起鸳鸯浴了，老师很细心的帮洗着，之后上床开始服务，老师口技很好，会舔，老师下面很粉，69一会儿后实在有点顶不住了就要求进入主题了，换了几个动作后只能无奈的投降了，老师不催钟，体验很好，下次还来，喜欢嫩妹的放心冲… 【特 点】：环境好，不容易找到，周围出行方便，小区还有吃喝玩乐的场所 【报告细节】： 上榜联系 @gzmdh1_…
【采花频道】：https://t.me/gzmdh1/880 【牡丹花群】：https://t.me/gzmdh 【艺 名】：宁宁 【联系方式】: @Ningnigbb 【位 置】：金茂 【采花费用】：700半价 【验证留名】：纽特 【验证时间】：7-7 【推荐程度】：6 【服务类型】：xcz 【特 点】：简单xcz，🐻应该是科技，颜值还可以 【报告细节】：提前约好时间6点，提前到地方没想到居然被罚站了40分钟，到地方进门问老师，她居然说半价罚站正常，说是她花钱上榜跟代聊合作代聊做活动不是她想的，半价是代聊随意派单。 好在是真人跟照片还是对版的，然后老师态度还算可以，流程就是简单xcz了，口技不错，时间长不敷衍，可以摸下面，因为个人不喜欢69所以没做，接着戴t老师先女上，老师下面很紧，抹了润滑油也只能一点点插进去，包裹感很强，老师女生摇摇车体验感很不错，接着换体位也很配合…
【采花频道】：https://t.me/gzmdh1/768 【牡丹花群】：https://t.me/gzmdh 【艺 名】：舒漫☘️ 【联系方式】: @jtlai888 【位 置】：海珠区 【采花费用】：p900 【验证留名】：匿名 【验证时间】：6.20 【推荐程度】：9.8 【服务类型】：莞式服务 【特 点】：身材好，前凸后翘口活牛， 【报告细节】：进门是简单的寒暄，舒漫Is很热情，熟悉起来一下就放松了。简单冲了一下以后就迫不及待躺下了，这时Is也刚好变完装，慢慢走向我贴了上来，这个时候已经不争气的硬得不行了。服务只要不是太过分ls都可以满足，口活一流，把我的鸡鸡舔的太爽了，我都叫了出来，还会贴心问你服务够不够，是要继续服务还是要冲刺，我让Is坐上来输出了一会儿，真是神仙般的快乐，感觉来了以后换我在上面输出，老师下面已经湿透了，Is的喘息声不大，但是叫声很淫荡，但感觉很真实一下子就…
❤1
【采花频道】：https://t.me/gzmdh1/121 【牡丹花群】：https://t.me/gzmdh 【艺 名】：小兮 【联系方式】: @modou666888 【位 置】：新塘 【采花费用】：1200 【验证留名】：乔哈哈 【验证时间】：5.18 【推荐程度】：9 【服务类型】：莞式 【特 点】：该会都会健谈不冷场 【报告细节】：课室应该经常换是在一个旅馆里遥控上楼，看到第一面很漂亮，照片有点美颜正常但人照差别不大，遥控上楼开始正常流程老师会给你全方位洗白白过程时不时挑逗下小弟弟差不多就开始。这方面就不描述了服务该有的都有，没有的还问我有没有啥要求挺会聊话不会掉地上，不催你，值得推荐。 上榜联系 @gzmdh1_bot
❤️🔥增城老师报告导航❤️🔥 小兮x1 点击返回报告地区导航
广州牡丹花报告榜 pinned «广州牡丹花报告榜 📌点击进群 ✉️天河区 ✉️白云区 ✉️海珠区 ✉️花都区 ✉️荔湾区 ✉️从化区 ✉️越秀区 ✉️南沙区 ✉️黄埔区 ✉️佛山 ✉️番禺区 ✉️增城区 查看报告模板»
❤️🔥佛山老师报告导航❤️🔥 点击返回报告地区导航
❤️🔥南沙老师报告导航❤️🔥 点击返回报告地区导航
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gzmdh2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 697,489 of 1,585,237entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“广州牡丹花报告榜” (@gzmdh2), 276 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gzmdh2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.