Channel
@gz887799
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,200subscribers
-71 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003979759251 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gz887799 |
| Created | 12 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gz887799 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 2,200 | -71 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 2,271 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 2,271 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (12 June 2026 – 26 July 2026) |
| Views total | 2,731 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
6 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【会所名称】：岗贝水汇 【技师号码】：812 【联系方式】：@gz9800 【所在位置】：岗贝路 【验证留名】：gg 【验证时间】：6.21 【消费金额】：779 【场所服务】：95有的97都有 【技师质量】：技师服务也很到位 质量看起来不错 【服务态度】：不错 【场地环境】：店里环境不错 干净整洁 装修风格也不输 【有否餐食】：有的 【能否过夜】：能 【推荐程度】：9 【体验细节】：第一次过来，看到帖子说97天花板，就过来试试了，的确能配得上京溪97天花板，服务很到位，情绪价值拉满，一进房就看到穿着丁字裤大胸的美女技师在等着，上来先自我介绍一番，第一个就看中她了，技师先打开音乐跳着艳舞在身上来回摩擦，抓着我的手在她胸口揉搓，，跳了一会舞就开始服务，用软软的舌头亲遍A面，然后开始口，舌头很灵活很软没有齿感，口了一会就让技师换69口，我一边舔着技师的BB一边摸着技师的奶子，不一会就射了，射了她满嘴都是，接着技师开始水啸清理JJ还残…
❤2
【会所名称】：岗贝国际 【会所位置】：白云 【联系方式】：@gz9980 【会所价格】：879 【技师号码】：888 号 【验证留名】：c 罗哥 【验证时间】：7.12 【颜值评价】：9分 【身材评价】：9 【推荐理由】：老顾客了，每次过来都没让我失望过体验感满满，离我住的地方也不远，就冲着他这个质量和服务来的，部长和店员都非常热情，每次一到店都是热情的打招呼，全程跟进所有服务根本不用操心谁来安排，刚进房间看的我还是挺满意，高挑，苗条型，非常热情地打招呼，刚进房间就迫不及待的把我带到椅子旁就开始艳舞起来揉着奶子软软的，毒龙也是比较专业的，每一步动作都很到位，都是经过专业培训上岗的，舌尖带点温度每一步都恰到好处，69旋转式口爆每一口都是极限到深处，她在口的同时可以选择抠她的小穴或者舔舐，完美的近距离观看她的蜜臀，全程她也很会接的上话可以和你一直聊天，完全接得住话题不显得气氛很尴尬，磨棒服务也是做到了零距离接触，真实能感受到时不时好…
【会所名称】：岗贝水汇 【会所位置】：三元里岗贝路 【联系方式】：@gz9980 【会所价格】: 879 【技师号码】: 888 【验证留名】: 旧弟弟 【验证时间】:7.11 【颜值评价】:满分 高级网红脸却没有科技的感觉 【身材评价】：高瘦型。 【推荐理由】：位置很好找 环境新装修的很亮没有压抑 这点真的很好 安静没打扰，还提供有自助餐 茶水 水果饮料。妹子质量非常好 一进门对比之前去的水汇会所震惊了，嫩妹一枚 目测165 左右，胸也很大 果然是高质量，服务的话介绍的都有 毒龙 魔棒 等等，写到这里 就想起妹子 真是让人忍不住回味😆 过几天再来。 温馨提示:报告仅供参考
【会所名称】：岗贝国际水汇 【会所位置】：三元里 【联系方式】：@gz9980 【会所价格】：869 【技师号码】：658 号技师 【验证留名】：老韩 【验证时间】：5.12 【颜值评价】：99分 【身材评价】：99分 【推荐理由】：我是个资深老漂客，广州很多水汇都去过，目前这家店很热门，听说好多00后技师，今天过来体验部长给我安排了 658 号技师，真00后，03 年 超级嫩，颜值也好看，我加了技师微信，后面方便出来玩，她一进来第一时间搂着我跳舞，跳了5分钟，然后抱着我舌吻，靠着墙舌吻舌了10分钟，然后她从上到下帮我吹，看着她含着我下面很有感觉，两三分钟就出来一水了，然后去床上继续各种服务，先毒龙，一边毒龙一边帮我抓龙，然后冰火两重天，含着热水帮我吹，然后魔棒，一直磨啊一直磨，很舒服，然后倒立吹，69式吹，猛虎狗吹，很舒服，招式很多，玩的很花 果然粉粉嫩嫩 B 舔起来都不一样
【少御报告】https://t.me/GZsnyjhj 【会所名称三元里岗贝 【技师艺名】686 【联系方式】@gz9980 【所在位置】 三元里 【验证留名】 啊 G露 【验证时间】 6.29 【修车费用】 849 【颜值身材】颜值高 精致网红脸身材好 【服务内容】 95 97 【服务态度】 很主动 很配合 【优点缺点】 优点是环境干净 服务态度好 【推荐程度】 8 【体验细节】 放假想着找个水汇泄泄火 最近广州太热了 偶然刷到这家97水汇 看评论说不错 就过来尝试下了，到店直接让部长推荐的，看了一眼不错 是我喜欢的类型 到了房间先是来一段艳舞，随后开始拥抱起来上下抚摸她的身材，二弟情不自禁的起来了，然后坐下椅子上开始服务，技师认真清洗得很干净，开始从上面调情吸着奶头慢慢的往下滑，加上软软的嘴唇很是舒服，👄到二弟的部位直接👄上让二弟硬挺硬挺着，亲大腿内侧两边，又口二弟上下挪动着嘴巴，加上深喉更加有感觉了，没顶住一会第一水就在…
❤1
【工兵报告】https://t.me/xcgbt8 【会所名称】永乐荟水汇 【技师工号】686 【联系方式】 【所在位置】岗贝路 【验证留名】阿崽 【验证时间】5-2 【颜值身材】确实very good👍🏻 【服务内容】97 【服务态度】很有耐心 随便玩弄 非常配合 【优点缺点】都挺好 【推荐程度】这个价格这个服务质量的话我推荐无脑冲 【体验细节】不是第一次过来，也不会是最后一次，每次过来服务都非常好，店里面的人很热情，每个人都很懂礼貌，服务质量都不会差，每次过来找部长都是第一时间回信息，招待的也是非常到位，预约好打车第一时间赶往现场，到地方了还是老样子洗完澡到休息区一坐，根据自身的要求安排自己喜欢的类型，几分钟就可以直接安排好，到房间看的第一个就让我非常满意，简直就是冲着我个人的审美去的，要求相似度接近吻合，妹妹身上还带着一缕香味，加上身材 身高 样貌都很好非常热情，坐在凳子上清理着弟弟时不时还亲吻一下，胸围非常大一只手握不完…
❤1
会所名称：岗贝水汇 会所位置:岗贝附近 验证留名:NBA 技师编号: 333 上课价格：849 技师年龄：98左右 技师颜值：9.3 偏向耐看型 技师身材：9.5 不胖不瘦刚好 服务态度：态度不错，很热情 环境设备：95有的97都有 自由评论：也是第一次接触这个东西，又怕踩雷又想玩，大概跟部长了解了一些情况，预约就直接过来了，到店里感觉环境不错，就是不知道怎么个服务流程，迫不及待的去洗好了澡，大概等了几分钟也是安排上了，到房间里一看妹妹长得不错，身材偏微胖型，脸越看越喜欢跟耐看型差不多，简单的自我介绍流程过后就开始清理弟弟了，卫生方面还是很到位的，先来个正面奶子划过，随后再用舌头打转而过，前后流程都是差不多的，后面的话就多了一个条形吸起皮肤的服务，这个还是很不错的，撅起屁股做毒龙，感觉毒龙这个非常棒，难怪也有很多人去评价，可以让你忽冷又有点忽热，两重温度，磨棒这个东西也是让人流连忘返，零接触没有隔阂距离，时不时还能感觉到好像进…
【岗贝水汇出击报告】 【会所位置】： 【联系方式】： 【会所价格】: 【技师号码】: 【验证留名】: 【验证时间】: 【颜值评价】: 【身材评价】： 【推荐理由】： 温馨提示:报告仅供参考 👉频道介绍：https://t.me/gz887799
❤2
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @gz887799. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 294,100 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@gz887799 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“三元里岗贝国际出击报告” (@gz887799), 2,200 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gz887799.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.