Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

GX1000 CRYPTO 💎

@gxgems

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,423subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001631375545
TypeChannel
Username@gxgems
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gxgems

Growth

2,4222,4322,4277 August 2026 — 2,432 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,432 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,431 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,422 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,423 subscribers2,4237 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,421–2,434 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:172,423+1
10 Aug 2026, 06:472,422-9
7 Aug 2026, 12:482,431-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:302,432no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:272,432first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.4%
avg views ÷ 2,423 subscribers
Avg views / post
544
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.428%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (5 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total11,423
Reactions total28
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

28 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
725.0%
🔥621.4%
💯517.9%
414.3%
❤‍🔥310.7%
🌚13.57%
🐳13.57%
😁13.57%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC544 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$DEBTDOG 490k mc Aped here, good name to match cashcat that went massive. Too early imo, if Vlad will notice this will have a good run. Good team and narrative too. CA: 0x485f166a5fcc3a523f683b681d194c8fe2b91b03 Socials TG: https://t.me/DebtDogcoin X: https://x.com/debtdogx Chart: https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x2f520c4a9fc6cfb282e23928db2b5b6d3ed996b3cc0db48e14765d706d214019

1❤‍🔥1🌚1

Signed T. funk

7 Aug 2026, 01:58 UTC548 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

2x on $POSM 🔥 Good catch on the dip. Now you just gotta learn to HODL, Uniswap getting enough attention for this to start turning heads, and the chart is still looking strong after the dip. Early sellers getting shaken out, price looks ready to make another push. Wouldn’t be surprised if the next leg gets violent 👀 Keep this one on your radar. https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xc9736658d50d6b85392171f04adda832df

2

Signed T. funk

7 Aug 2026, 01:51 UTC545 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Achievement Unlocked: x2! ✌️ @gxgems made a x2+ call on Possum. $412K ➡️ $839K 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats ➡️Catch plays like this early with SpyDefi Filters!

Signed T. funk

7 Aug 2026, 00:36 UTC547 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

20x on $WOOF 🔥 Woof is everywhere, theyre now gaining more eyes from everywhere. Broke a new ATH of 6.5M and Consistently trending #1 on Dexscreener $WOOF is verified on FOMO app too. 10m is next? Send it .. https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x2a004148be6efee250420d93a1ac6393e32d2d60

💯2🐳1🔥1

Signed T. funk

7 Aug 2026, 00:24 UTC544 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Achievement Unlocked: x2! ✌️ @gxgems made a x2+ call on flipflapfloptop.... $149K ➡️ $302K 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats ➡️Auto-buy and sell calls like this through SpyDefi Filters!

Signed T. funk

6 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC550 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @futures_empirePhoto

📈 It's a typical scenario: whales continue to buy BTC, while retail traders are currently selling — CryptoQuant. 💬 emirfutures

Signed T. funk

6 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC547 viewsread 7 August 2026

Bought the dip on $AAPLCAT, got a tip from a chad that I know that team is gonna push this. Tokenized stocks narrative. Still NFA DYOR “Robinhood inspired feline mascot blending cat memes with tokenized AAPL stock exposure on-chain” CA: 0x7fde253982ee41f45987049820dc36e7716f7777 Socials: X: https://x.com/AAPLCATRH Chart: https://dexscreener.com/bsc/0xc1665fc56c71ee7d452da78bb2b10c4852011d0c

Signed T. funk

6 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC513 viewsread 7 August 2026

Aped dip on $CHARLIE, gamble here. Charlie on Eth had a massive run, let see this dog if it gets wild here on RH chain. DYOR 0x4e4b019a89ca33b8f3feb9e7b291f65d453e0bdc https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xb1676e3dd940ec215fe0ed81bab5beb4fa9d8492595fff3478735f650131af1a

Signed T. funk

6 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC544 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Achievement Unlocked: x2! ✌️ @gxgems made a x2+ call on Omoji Pearcat. $112K ➡️ $230K 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats ➡️Catch plays like this early with SpyDefi Filters!

Signed T. funk

6 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC545 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Bought a good size of $POSM, already ran the ATH at 1.1m mc, also Uniswap mentioned it in a presentation. “Berna posted about an Easter egg hidden in the Pools.trade launchpad. The background is that the launchpad’s token contracts secretly contain the ASCII art for POSM, also known as POSSUM. Its logo features a cowboy-hatted possum drawn in green text.” CA: 0x658bf542c9384dc000a07540b0b29ef7e79fe126 Chart: https

Signed T. funk

6 Aug 2026, 06:50 UTC547 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$MAX has donated 300bnb on charity for Giggle, so bullish enough to catch more eyes and saw some solid KOLS supporting. Chart has been in consolidation for a few hours and its ready to break another ATH. https://dexscreener.com/bsc/0xa2b1926cb477e92445cf70602f1a7200361f761d

1

Signed T. funk

6 Aug 2026, 02:58 UTC546 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$BTCC on BSC Aped here, low cap but still the narrative will defo gonna cook. 2% buy/sell tax on BNB Chain that converts to BTCB and sends 100% of proceeds to the Binance Charity wallet. Its logo features an orange heart with a white Bitcoin "B" symbol. CA: 0xfc0bd37420c0c8464a6905a3955214a4e7617777 Socials: TG: https://telegram.me/BTCCCHARITY Chart: https://gmgn.ai/bsc/token/30I510nA_0xfc0bd37420c0c8464a6905a39

😁1

Signed T. funk

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @gxgems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GX1000 CRYPTO 💎” (@gxgems), 2,423 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gxgems.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.