🔥TeleTop 频道推荐 📢欧博代理 欧博私网 亚星代理 亚星私网 📢频道帖子浏览量|群组上粉 📢迪拜焦点|最新进展|热点事件 📢电报精准涨粉|快速破千 📢【满天星光✨】流量聚宝盆@飞机引流@一站... 📢印尼马来 新闻🌎 📢皇冠百家乐 欧博百家乐 亚星百家乐 利博... 📢热点事件 📢缅甸卡卡湾赌场/卡卡湾赌场客服/卡卡湾娱... 📢彩票【福彩3D 排列3/5】开奖通知 💎广告推荐 📢✅【辉煌娱乐城93.CC】柬埔寨某盘总3... 📢东南亚今日头条|新闻|爆料|悬赏|通缉|... 📢🅾️AG官网直营✅大客必备✅注册送15... 🔍互推公示 🪧流量互推说明
Channel
吃瓜搞笑 🪻
@gx976
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,438subscribers
+19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002822957429 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gx976 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gx976 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 2,438 | +31 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 2,407 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 2,412 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 2,419 | first reading |
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.224%
- avg views ÷ 2,438 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5.5
- 31 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 31
- of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 31 (6 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 169 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 14m 58s
- Average length
- 50s
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
群友刷视频,这角度不错
经济不好小姐姐的奶一个比一个大
这画面看起来就像你没钱的时候,看着自己心爱的女人和别人走在一起,而你只能躲在角落默默流泪
美团女骑手撞到老人后想跑,路人见老人受伤后拦下女子,女子叫嚣道:关你们什么事……
商家想收回摆放在外面的桌子,小仙男说我食物放在上面了,你不能动,此时此刻同桌女子淡定干饭。。。
莫斯科 醉酒非法移民 击倒杀害一名聋哑残疾人 死者留下了两个孩子。
广西柳州,路怒症,差一点就把出租车司机捅对穿了
无理也要争三分,胡搅蛮缠
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @gx976. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 124,131 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 40 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@TonAdNews · 8,6203 posts欧博亚星利博万利AG贵宾会一比一
@agag232 · 1,0221 post环球360私网🅰️环球UG私网🅰️利博私网🅰️正网一比一
@agag356 · 1,0211 post菲律宾新闻|吃瓜爆料
@at011 · 101 post🏆速搜官方🆔@SSOU反诈群
@chuhaiFZ · 1361 post电报智能吸粉流量翻倍
@fgagbahb3462 · 671 post电报高效引流一键爆粉
@gfnbfsgnfs45875 · 791 post欧博/亚星/利博私网/万利私网AGPG电子🅰️环球UG私网
@hgq223 · 1,0211 post欧博亚星环球UG环球360私网一比一
@hgq299 · 1,0221 post欧博亚星环球UG环球360私网一比一
@hgq333 · 1,0211 post柬埔寨新闻|热点新闻
@jianpuzhai177 · 9601 post中本葱姜蒜
@lastdanc · 1,5301 post万利私网🅰️欧博私网🅰️环球360私网🅰️亚星欧博/百家乐代理
@oubo131 · 9741 post万利私网🅰️欧博私网🅰️环球360私网🅰️亚星欧博/百家乐代理
@oubo42 · 9811 post欧博代理 欧博私网 亚星代理 亚星私网
@oubo6699 · 11,5081 post欧博代理 亚星代理 皇冠代理 欧博私网
@qushuiyin_6 · 1,9791 post利博官网|环球官网360|皇冠体育|AG|百家乐正网私网1:1(最高)
@tgchfq5 · 1,3161 post亚星私网|欧博私网|利博私网|万利私网|亚星欧博|百家乐代理
@tgchqfb · 1,5041 post万利私网🅰️欧博私网🅰️环球360私网🅰️亚星欧博/百家乐代理
@tgchqfm · 1,3561 post皇冠足球 欧博代理 欧博私网 亚星私网
@xiaohongshucaiji21 · 1,9651 post欧博私网🅰️万利私网🅰️亚星私网🅰️亚星欧博一比一
@yaxing321 · 9921 post亚星私网/欧博私网/利博私网/亚星欧博百家乐代理
@yaxingkk · 7201 postTelegram数字生活指南
@Youzhigongxu00 · 7,3191 post欧博私网 皇冠私网 欧博包杀 皇冠百家乐
@zjndufuf · 8841 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@dibai177 · 9491 post频道帖子浏览量|群组上粉
@fbdhbdbdteyrtu555 · 601 post皇冠百家乐 欧博百家乐 亚星百家乐 利博百家乐
@jfnfjfje · 1,5761 post缅甸卡卡湾赌场/卡卡湾赌场客服/卡卡湾娱乐
@kakawan20 · 991 post欧博代理 欧博私网 亚星代理 亚星私网
@oubo6699 · 11,5081 postTeleTop中文索引官方频道
@TeleTopOrg · 33,0471 post热点事件
@xw966 · 9631 post印尼马来 新闻🌎
@yinni977 · 9491 post东南亚大事件 金三角大事件 缅甸大事件
@yuenanU · 216,4331 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“吃瓜搞笑 🪻” (@gx976), 2,438 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gx976.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.