Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MUHAMMAD NURUL BANAN (GUS BANAN)

Channel

MUHAMMAD NURUL BANAN (GUS BANAN)

@gusbanan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

3,090subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001299722891
TypeChannel
Username@gusbanan
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gusbanan

Growth

3,0903,1013,095.56 August 2026 — 3,101 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,101 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,100 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,093 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,092 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,093 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,094 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,090 subscribers6 August 202626 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 19 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,088–3,103 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 01:553,090-4
23 Aug 2026, 08:383,094+1
20 Aug 2026, 05:343,093+1
17 Aug 2026, 12:443,092-1
14 Aug 2026, 06:553,093-7
7 Aug 2026, 13:533,100-1
6 Aug 2026, 14:303,101no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:263,101first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.10%
avg views ÷ 3,090 subscribers
Avg views / post
127
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total887
Reactions total23
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

47 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1940.4%
😁817.0%
🥰714.9%
👍612.8%
🤣510.6%
🐳12.13%
👏12.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 00:54 UTC113 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

KONSLET ENERGI: "HARTAKU AKAN DIHISAB" Anda melakukan hubungan seks dengan pasangan nikah sah; di situ Anda penuh penerimaan bahwa seks adalah kebutuhan biologis Anda. Penolakan karena rasa berdosa juga tidak ada, karena sadar dia halal bagi Anda. Dengannya Anda pun bisa sangat terbuka untuk urusan yang sebenarnya sangat tabu. Nyaman dan enak, kan? Beda ketika zina: Anda dihantui mungkin rasa berdosa, rasa takut

6👍1

Signed Muhammad Nurul Banan

5 Aug 2026, 00:53 UTC95 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Muhammad Nurul Banan

4 Aug 2026, 23:37 UTC106 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Semesta bekerja pada hukum vibrational matching: Alam semesta selalu merespons siapa diri Anda (state of being), bukan merespons apa yang Anda inginkan. State being Anda yang direspons. Kalau mencari uang dengan state being: "Saya belum punya, maka saya harus bekerja untuk mencukupi/memenuhi," maka respons Semesta hanya akan mengirim energi rezeki yang tanpa Anda kenali kenyangnya/penuhnya. Lapar direspons lapar,

2

Signed Muhammad Nurul Banan

4 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC104 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

KATROK TAPI NYATA "Saya dulu selalu berpikir kalau tidur cepat, bangun pagi, rajin olahraga, Tidak merokok, dan tidak minum alkohol bisa bikin umur panjang. Tapi belakangan saya dengar, penemu treadmill meninggal di usia 54 tahun, Pencipta senam meninggal di usia 57 tahun, Juara dunia binaraga meninggal pada usia 41 tahun, Dan pemain sepak bola terbaik dunia meninggal di usia 60 tahun. Sebaliknya, para pecinta

🤣52👍1👏1

Signed Muhammad Nurul Banan

3 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC151 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Di dunia 3D, hampir semua orang bergerak dengan frekuensi rendah: ada yang cemas, ada yang marah, ada yang ambisius. Yang merasa pintar butuh mendebatmu agar mereka tampak pintar. Yang merasa shalih butuh menghakimimu agar tampak kudus. Yang merasa miskin butuh uangmu agar mereka kenyang. Yang merasa lemah butuh merampas rasa kasihanmu agar kamu iba. Yang merasa ketakutan butuh menjatuhkanmu agar ia merasa aman.

Signed Gus Banan

3 Aug 2026, 01:49 UTC159 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ibnu Abbas RA pernah melihat sekelompok orang dari Yaman yang datang berhaji tanpa membawa bekal sama sekali. Mereka berkata, "Kami adalah orang-orang yang bertawakal (mutawakkilun)." Apa jawaban telak dari sahabat Nabi ini? Beliau berkata: "Kalian bukan orang yang bertawakal, tapi kalian adalah orang-orang yang membebani orang lain (muta-akkilun—orang yang cuma mau numpang gratis)!" Kamu mengaku tawakal dengan m

2👍2

Signed Muhammad Nurul Banan

3 Aug 2026, 00:56 UTC159 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Banyak orang tidak sedang tawadhu. Mereka cuma kecanduan citra. Demi dipuji sebagai orang yang rendah hati, mulutnya sibuk mengucap: "Saya masih bodoh." "Saya ini bukan siapa-siapa." "Saya belum layak." "Saya fakir ilmu." Padahal, yang mereka rawat bukan tawadhu, melainkan "branding kerendahan hati". Ironisnya, demi mendapat validasi sebagai orang tawadhu, mereka rela mengkhianati kenyataan tentang dirinya sendiri

👍1

Signed Gus Banan

28 Jul 2026, 00:06 UTC318 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

10+6=17. Londo ireng. Lele ditanam. Ga ikut nyoblos tapi ikut mumet.

Signed Muhammad Nurul Banan

23 Jul 2026, 12:34 UTC415 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Semakin besar Anda bergantung kepada seseorang, semakin kecil posisi tawar Anda. Misalnya: Anda sangat butuh pekerjaan → sulit menolak perlakuan buruk atasan. Anda sangat butuh pasangan → rela diselingkuhi atau direndahkan demi tidak ditinggalkan. Anda sangat butuh pengakuan → mudah dimanipulasi dengan pujian atau kritik. Anda sangat butuh uang → lebih mudah menerima kesepakatan yang merugikan. Maka itu: Orang

🐳1

Signed Gus Banan

23 Jul 2026, 00:00 UTC355 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Rendah hati itu tidak perlu menonjolkan, tetapi juga tidak perlu menyembunyikan cahaya. Pura-pura rendah hati itu menyembunyikan cahaya agar orang lain tidak iri atau tersinggung. Menghindari resistensi. Hal itu lahir dari ketakutan (takut dijauhi, takut dianggap sombong, takut mengganggu, takut ada friksi). Ibarat sebagai matahari sengaja meredup agar tidak menyilaukan semut. Begitu itu yang disebut pura-pura r

Signed Muhammad Nurul Banan

22 Jul 2026, 11:17 UTC277 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Jokowi diam tapi makin berkuasa. Itu keberanian dan kedaulatan diri. Anaknya diam, tapi duduk sejajar menteri. Itu ketakutan diri.

Signed Gus Banan

22 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTC224 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Apa Matahari peduli kalau Neptunus kekurangan sinarnya, sementara Venus kepanasan kalau terlalu intens terima sinarnya? Matahari tidak peduli. Sedikitpun dia tidak mau merendahkan dirinya dengan "sedikit saja sopan" untuk memahami bahwa Venus kepanasan, Neptunus kedinginan. Itu bukan egois. Itu karena Matahari sadar dengan takdir kosmiknya sebagai pemimpin tata surya: sebagai sumber pencerah. Menjadi wapres itu ta

😁3

Signed Gus Banan

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gusbanan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MUHAMMAD NURUL BANAN (GUS BANAN)” (@gusbanan), 3,090 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gusbanan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.