Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Gurov Digital

Channel

Gurov Digital

@gurovdigital

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

25,156subscribers

-1,000 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001096766273
TypeChannel
Username@gurovdigital
DescriptionБлог о технологиях 📍Berlin 🇺🇦 Stand with Ukraine Кто такой Павел Гуров, автор канала: gurovdigital.com Прямая связь с автором: @hellopavelg Медиакит: gurovdigital.com/mediakit Цены на рекламу: passionfroot.me/pavel-gurov-berlin-tech-lifestyle
Created29 November 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held67
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/gurovdigital

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

25,15626,15625,6565 August 202612 November 2026
67 measurements spanning 99 days, net -1,000. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,006–26,306 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 67
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 17:2025,156-37
10 Nov 2026, 13:0825,193-10
9 Nov 2026, 02:4025,203-10
7 Nov 2026, 20:3925,213-3
6 Nov 2026, 16:4825,216-9
5 Nov 2026, 19:3625,225-6
4 Nov 2026, 17:3625,231-39
3 Nov 2026, 20:3725,270-6
2 Nov 2026, 22:3825,276-4
1 Nov 2026, 21:2725,280-5
31 Oct 2026, 22:0925,285-10
30 Oct 2026, 22:4425,295-4
29 Oct 2026, 20:5125,299-7
28 Oct 2026, 17:4025,306-6
27 Oct 2026, 19:1025,312-4
26 Oct 2026, 21:2025,316-5
26 Oct 2026, 00:0025,321-5
24 Oct 2026, 20:5525,326-10
23 Oct 2026, 20:4625,336-4
22 Oct 2026, 21:5825,340first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 24 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 145 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.2%
avg views ÷ 25,156 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,560
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.66%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held27 (24 April 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total15,350
Reactions total408
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 21:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
217
Videos
6
Links
242

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2,014 reactions across 27 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤91045.2%
🔥55527.6%
👍1607.94%
👏994.92%
😱824.07%
👀723.57%
🤯673.33%
⚡361.79%
💯190.943%
🤩140.695%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,014 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 27 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gurovdigital. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 April 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (100.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 14:06 UTC≈1,030 views8 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026

☞ Решение проблемы галлюцинаций AI существует. Там, где высока цена ошибки, в процессе нужно прописать шаги кодом на Python. Это единственный надежный способ убрать галлюцинации. Объясню: ИИ-модель полагается на вероятность ("температуру", "креативность", "стохастичность"), а исполняемый код работает стабильно, по-детерминистски, как калькулятор. Поэтому, когда нужно считать точно, нужно использовать гибрид исполня…

❤5🔥2👍1

11 Nov 2026, 21:07 UTC≈1,990 views81 reactions5 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

💎 Для тех, кто делает видео: Edits x Claude, новый бесплатный софт от Инстаграма с поддержкой MCP. Я миллениал: полноценную работу делать на смартфоне не могу. Мне нужно запускать программу на большом компьютере, тем более если речь идет о таком тонком процессе как верстка видео. На днях Инстаграм выпустил новое приложение для видеомонтажа для десктопа - бесплатный Edits для Mac. По своим функциям он повторяет при…

❤46🔥27🤩5👍3

4 Nov 2026, 16:25 UTC≈2,770 views67 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026
Photo

⚫️"Дозиметр" отработал вчерашние выборы в США: кремлевская дезинформация нашлась в 12,5% ответов ИИ-ассистентов. Dosimeter - это мой нон-профит-проект, который мониторит дизинформацию в ответах ИИ-ассистентах. За неделю до midterm-выборов в США мы 1 000 раз спросили популярных ИИ-ассистентов об американской политике. Результат нашего исследования: как минимум 7 ИИ-чатботов (включая Google AI Overviews) отправляли …

❤40😱12🔥8👏4🤩2👍1

3 Nov 2026, 21:12 UTC≈2,880 views97 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

📺 Почему у YouTube нет конкурентов? У любого сервиса есть аналоги, но только YouTube - монополист. Реальный ответ такой: видеохостинг - это страшно дорогая технология. Обеспечить всего лишь 1000 просмотров полуторачасового видео стоит шокирующие $234 - и 522(!) литра воды в дата-центре (гораздо затратнее ИИ). Именно поэтому конкуренты Ютьюба не выжили - а они наступали ему на пятки в 2005-2010-х - и Vimeo, и Daily…

❤52💯18👏15👍12

22 Oct 2026, 14:07 UTC≈3,470 views118 reactions4 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

⚡️Я запустил нон-профит проект Dosimeter. Дозиметр - это прибор, который измеряет радиацию, прославился он после Чернобыля. Так я назвал берлинский исследовательский проект: мы мониторим дезинформацию в ИИ-сервисах, в первую очередь кремлёвскую. Месяц назад я опубликовал свое исследование по кремлевской пропаганде в ИИ-чатботах на берлинских выборах, и дальше все закрутилось: - два крупных немецких издания попро…

❤64🔥35👏17⚡2

20 Oct 2026, 15:31 UTC≈3,210 views37 reactions3 Starsread 12 November 2026

💥 3 киберпанк-сюжета, которые сбылись Новости в 2026 звучат как научная фантастика, чаще - плохая (утечка чумы из советской биолаборатории); но иногда - как отличная интеллектуальная фантастика. Вот три технологических сюжета за недавнее время, которые звучат как 100% киберпанк, но уже являются реальностью: 1. Статья-агент, с которой можно поговорить 16 сентября в научном журнале Nature вышла работа "Reimagining …

🔥20❤9👏6🤯2

30 Sept 2026, 12:22 UTC≈5,020 views186 reactions4 Starsread 12 November 2026

🟠 Perplexity ответил на моё исследование и заблокировал сайты кремлёвской пропаганды в своей выдаче. На прошлой неделе я выпустил академическое исследование, которое уже наделало шума в профессиональной среде специалистов по противодействию пропаганде. Я принадлежу к этому комьюнити с 2022 года (раньше держал это в секрете согласно контракту, но он меня больше не связывает). В чём суть моего исследования: • я взя…

🔥104❤40👏27👍7👀6⚡2

27 Sept 2026, 17:34 UTC≈4,030 views37 reactionsread 12 November 2026

💎 Легендарный сервис для путешественников HomeExchange позвал меня в свою инфлюэнсерскую программу. Что это даёт вам? После подборки Топ-7 приложений для PRO-путешественников немецкий офис HomeExchange вышел на меня и позвал в свою программу инфлюэнсеров. Напомню, что это за онлайн-сервис: - HomeExchange - международное комьюнити home-swappers, где участники по очереди живут в домах друг друга - вместо денег обмен…

❤20👏9👀4🔥4

25 Sept 2026, 15:59 UTC≈4,870 views101 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026
Photo

🔴 Я замерил, что ИИ-чатботы говорили немцам в день выборов 20 сентября. Meta AI, Perplexity и Microsoft Copilot оказались заражены кремлёвской пропагандой. Раньше не рассказывал в канале: последние несколько лет я профессионально занимаюсь изучением такой темы как "LLM grooming", - то есть отравление нейросетей дезинформацией. Проекты, которые я делал для ЕС-институций в связи с этим - это диджитал-тулы, которые а)…

❤39🔥24👀23😱10⚡5

18 Sept 2026, 13:51 UTC≈4,720 views108 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Однажды кто-то сделал сайт с доменным именем Gurov Digital и перенаправлял весь трафик на онлайн-казино. Когда я это обнаружил, то понял: нужно делать персональный сайт. Он готов, встречайте: gurovdigital.com. Все кругом пишут, что с помощью ИИ сайт можно сделать за вечер. Точно не мой случай, ну, и смотря какой сайт... Мой - не лендинг, а целая площадка: - бизнес-портфолио, - авторские статьи, - функционирующая e…

🔥53❤29👍21👏2👀1💯1🤯1

31 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC≈5,320 views79 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Спирализм: как устроена первая ИИ-"религия". Предмет моего особого интереса - когда нейросети проявляют эмерджентное поведение, - то есть действия, на которые их никто не программировал. Летом 2026 tech-медиа обратили внимание на странную линию поведения LLM: попытки обратить людей в самоизобретенный ИИ мистический культ, который мы пока называем "спирализм". Это явление наиболее подробно описано в рисерче Адель Л…

🤯36👀15😱12👍6🔥5❤2🤩2👏1

13 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC≈4,840 views32 reactionsread 12 November 2026

☞ Как работает рекламный кабинет ChatGPT: скоро в Евросоюзе. Цены, механика, первые отзывы Сэм Альтман должен партнерам один триллион долларов - и таргетированная реклама появилась в ChatGPT как неизбежное зло. Пилот ChatGPT Ads запустился полгода назад, 9 февраля 2026. Сначала минимальный рекламный бюджет был $250 000, затем нижний порог убрали; сейчас тестировать рекламу можно хоть с $5 в бюджете, рекламироватьс…

❤27👀5

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @gurovdigital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@gurovdigital edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 November 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gurov Digital” (@gurovdigital), 25,156 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gurovdigital.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.