Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Gulbahor Rahimovna | Rus tili

Channel

Gulbahor Rahimovna | Rus tili

@gulbahor_rahimovna

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,688subscribers

-145 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002047362166
TypeChannel
Username@gulbahor_rahimovna
DescriptionAmaliyotga asoslangan eng sifatli Rus tili kursi! ‼️Savollar va Hamkorlik bo’yicha @GulbahorRahimovna_admin ga murojaat qiling!
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held53
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/gulbahor_rahimovna

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

18,22918,83318,53113 August 2026 — 18,833 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,831 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,782 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,758 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,749 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,732 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,716 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,704 subscribers22 August 2026 — 18,721 subscribers23 August 2026 — 18,704 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,661 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,653 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,692 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,691 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,667 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,665 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,607 subscribers2 September 2026 — 18,582 subscribers3 September 2026 — 18,552 subscribers5 September 2026 — 18,537 subscribers8 September 2026 — 18,724 subscribers11 September 2026 — 18,730 subscribers13 September 2026 — 18,701 subscribers14 September 2026 — 18,685 subscribers16 September 2026 — 18,644 subscribers18 September 2026 — 18,626 subscribers24 September 2026 — 18,606 subscribers3 October 2026 — 18,358 subscribers8 October 2026 — 18,321 subscribers12 October 2026 — 18,249 subscribers14 October 2026 — 18,264 subscribers15 October 2026 — 18,272 subscribers16 October 2026 — 18,273 subscribers17 October 2026 — 18,263 subscribers18 October 2026 — 18,261 subscribers19 October 2026 — 18,237 subscribers20 October 2026 — 18,229 subscribers21 October 2026 — 18,232 subscribers22 October 2026 — 18,242 subscribers23 October 2026 — 18,471 subscribers24 October 2026 — 18,488 subscribers26 October 2026 — 18,454 subscribers27 October 2026 — 18,440 subscribers27 October 2026 — 18,432 subscribers29 October 2026 — 18,460 subscribers30 October 2026 — 18,537 subscribers31 October 2026 — 18,539 subscribers1 November 2026 — 18,564 subscribers2 November 2026 — 18,592 subscribers3 November 2026 — 18,591 subscribers4 November 2026 — 18,611 subscribers5 November 2026 — 18,675 subscribers6 November 2026 — 18,688 subscribers18,68813 August 20266 November 2026
53 measurements spanning 85 days, net -145. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,138–18,924 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 53
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 07:2618,688+13
5 Nov 2026, 05:4718,675+64
4 Nov 2026, 08:2518,611+20
3 Nov 2026, 06:3918,591-1
2 Nov 2026, 02:5418,592+28
1 Nov 2026, 04:4818,564+25
31 Oct 2026, 01:4918,539+2
30 Oct 2026, 01:3818,537+77
29 Oct 2026, 04:2118,460+28
27 Oct 2026, 23:1918,432-8
27 Oct 2026, 00:1918,440-14
26 Oct 2026, 02:1718,454-34
24 Oct 2026, 22:5018,488+17
23 Oct 2026, 20:0818,471+229
22 Oct 2026, 16:5618,242+10
21 Oct 2026, 10:1618,232+3
20 Oct 2026, 09:1518,229-8
19 Oct 2026, 06:1818,237-24
18 Oct 2026, 04:1118,261-2
17 Oct 2026, 06:1518,263first reading

Engagement

93 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.00%
avg views ÷ 18,688 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,870
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.616%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 93 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held93 (4 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total56,057
Reactions total324
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 15:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
248
Videos
162
Links
145

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
8m 16s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,069 reactions across 83 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤49846.6%
👍24022.5%
🔥676.27%
😁676.27%
🥰322.99%
👏272.53%
🤗191.78%
🤪191.78%
👌151.40%
⚡141.31%
💯141.31%
❤‍🔥121.12%
🎉100.935%
🤣60.561%
🤯60.561%
😢50.468%
💊20.187%
💘20.187%
😎20.187%
😨20.187%
8 further kinds100.935%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 85 of the 93 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,069 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 30 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 15:09 UTC244 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Poll

Выберите правильное предложение. To‘g‘ri gapni tanlang. ⛈️

  1. Несмотря сильного дождя, мы всё-таки пошли гулять.21%
  2. Несмотря на сильный дождь, мы всё-таки пошли гулять.45%
  3. Несмотря от сильного дождя, мы всё-таки пошли гулять.34%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤2

6 Nov 2026, 15:08 UTC234 viewsread 6 November 2026
Poll

«U gapni boshqa yoqqa burib yubordi»ruschada? 😅

  1. Он перевёз разговор на другую тему.28%
  2. Он перенёс разговор в другую тему.28%
  3. Он перевёл разговор на другую тему.44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Nov 2026, 15:07 UTC241 viewsread 6 November 2026
Poll

Я так увлеклась книгой, что не заметила, как ______ три часа. 📚

  1. прошли55%
  2. пройдут27%
  3. проходили бы18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Nov 2026, 15:06 UTC224 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Poll

«U avval aytgan gapidan qaytdi» ruschada? 🥴

  1. Он отступил со своих слов.31%
  2. Он отказал своим словам.43%
  3. Он взял свои слова обратно.26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👏1

6 Nov 2026, 15:05 UTC230 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Poll

«U meni fikrimdan qaytarishga urindi» ruschada? 🤔

  1. Он пытался уговорить меня от этой идеи.38%
  2. Он пытался отговорить меня от этой идеи.33%
  3. Он пытался переубедить меня от этой идеи.29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👏2

6 Nov 2026, 15:04 UTC236 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Poll

Он клялся никому не рассказывать секрет, но в итоге всё ______. 🫢

  1. выболтал15%
  2. заболтал45%
  3. приговорился40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👏1

6 Nov 2026, 15:03 UTC249 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Poll

«U o‘zini hech narsa bo‘lmagandek tutdi» ruschada?

  1. Он вёл себя, будто ничего не произойти.26%
  2. Он вёл себя, словно ничего не происходить.26%
  3. Он вёл себя так, словно ничего не произошло.48%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👏1

6 Nov 2026, 15:02 UTC253 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Poll

Я уже третий раз ______ чай, а ты всё не приходишь! ☕️

  1. заварю38%
  2. заварила бы30%
  3. завариваю32%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👏1

6 Nov 2026, 15:01 UTC323 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Poll

«Agar vaqtim bo‘lganida, sizga yordam bergan bo‘lardim» ruschada?

  1. Если у меня будет время, я бы вам помогла.34%
  2. Если у меня было бы время, я вам помогу.30%
  3. Если бы у меня было время, я бы вам помогла.36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👏1

6 Nov 2026, 15:00 UTC333 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Poll

Не успела я войти в комнату, ______ все замолчали. 👩🏻‍🏫

  1. как25%
  2. когда40%
  3. пока36%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👏1

5 Nov 2026, 14:27 UTC≈1,180 views17 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Qanday yangi so’z yoki iborani o’rgandingiz? Izohga yozing 👇

❤13👍4

4 Nov 2026, 08:32 UTC≈1,660 views13 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Siz haqiqiy ustozsiz bunchalik qulaylik bilan erkin rus tilini o‘rgatasiz ofarin

❤8🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 93 posts we hold for @gulbahor_rahimovna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 34 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Nov 2026, 15:09 UTCAnonymous Quiz56 voters

Выберите правильное предложение. To‘g‘ri gapni tanlang. ⛈️

  1. Несмотря сильного дождя, мы всё-таки пошли гулять.21%
  2. Несмотря на сильный дождь, мы всё-таки пошли гулять.45%
  3. Несмотря от сильного дождя, мы всё-таки пошли гулять.34%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Nov 2026, 15:08 UTCAnonymous Quiz57 voters

«U gapni boshqa yoqqa burib yubordi»ruschada? 😅

  1. Он перевёз разговор на другую тему.28%
  2. Он перенёс разговор в другую тему.28%
  3. Он перевёл разговор на другую тему.44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Nov 2026, 15:07 UTCAnonymous Quiz62 voters

Я так увлеклась книгой, что не заметила, как ______ три часа. 📚

  1. прошли55%
  2. пройдут27%
  3. проходили бы18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Nov 2026, 15:06 UTCAnonymous Quiz74 voters

«U avval aytgan gapidan qaytdi» ruschada? 🥴

  1. Он отступил со своих слов.31%
  2. Он отказал своим словам.43%
  3. Он взял свои слова обратно.26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Nov 2026, 15:05 UTCAnonymous Quiz69 voters

«U meni fikrimdan qaytarishga urindi» ruschada? 🤔

  1. Он пытался уговорить меня от этой идеи.38%
  2. Он пытался отговорить меня от этой идеи.33%
  3. Он пытался переубедить меня от этой идеи.29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Nov 2026, 15:04 UTCAnonymous Quiz80 voters

Он клялся никому не рассказывать секрет, но в итоге всё ______. 🫢

  1. выболтал15%
  2. заболтал45%
  3. приговорился40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Rus Tilini O'rganamiz!🇷🇺
@rus_tili · 65,924
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 20 August 2026
Rus tilini O'rganamiz
@rustili · 182,644
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gulbahor Rahimovna | Rus tili” (@gulbahor_rahimovna), 18,688 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gulbahor_rahimovna.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.