Channel
@guilhotinainfo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,424subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001365936420 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @guilhotinainfo |
| Created | 28 February 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/guilhotinainfo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 1,424 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 1,426 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 1,427 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:48 | 1,424 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 1,424 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (2 August 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,609 |
| Reactions total | 75 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Para quem não teve oportunidade de dar sentido aos recentes eventos em Ceuta, esta reportagem da Noow, em apenas 15 minutos, fornece um resumo bastante completo do que aconteceu, do conluio das autoridades marroquinas, da manipulação das massas de migrantes, e dos poderes que estão por detrás desta operação que serve tão bem a agenda da extrema-direita espanhola e europeia – e do regime sionista. Inclui testemunhos …
A normalização da barbárie, como sistematiza a uncivilized, é um processo colectivo que acarreta não só pesadas consequências psicológicas para todas e todos nós, enquanto indivíduos, como grandes riscos para as nossas sociedades e para a Humanidade como um todo – como, aliás, vimos a alertar desde Janeiro de 2024. A dessensibilização que foi forçada sobre nós é assustadora – basta tentarmos comparar as nossas própr…
🇵🇸🇮🇱🏴☠️Palestinianos em Gaza realizam orações fúnebres por 112 pessoas resgatadas dos escombros de casas destruídas durante a guerra genocida de Israel As vítimas eram membros das famílias Al-Hasayneh e Abu Sharia, mortas quando o exército israelita bombardeou as suas casas a 23 de novembro de 2023 O funeral é considerado um dos maiores da história palestiniana devido ao grande número de vítimas. O massacre contr…
Guilhotina.info pinned «Não é exagero afirmar que o genocídio em Gaza mudou o mundo para sempre, tanto a nível material como a nível psicológico. (...) Com o passar do tempo, os horrores que israel impõe sobre Gaza intensificaram-se — mas a mobilização de massas não. (...) Um mundo…»
Não é exagero afirmar que o genocídio em Gaza mudou o mundo para sempre, tanto a nível material como a nível psicológico. (...) Com o passar do tempo, os horrores que israel impõe sobre Gaza intensificaram-se — mas a mobilização de massas não. (...) Um mundo que não conseguiu impedir o genocídio em Gaza, e não conseguiu fazer justiça aos poderosos ligados a Epstein, foi o que abriu caminho para o que está a acontece…
Mais de 6 meses se passaram desde a publicação dos Epstein Files – sem que se tenham registado quaisquer revoltas ou convulsões sociais no Ocidente. Noutra época, aquilo que foi revelado nesses documentos teria sido suficiente para colapsar regimes inteiros. Na nossa Era, a contínua exposição a níveis de barbárie que até há poucos anos seriam impensáveis dessensibilizou-nos. «Ao sermos repetidamente expostos ao impe…
As forças ucranianas cometeram um crime de guerra esta manhã com um ataque com drones contra uma praia russa no Mar Negro, em pleno Verão, que provocou a morte de seis banhistas, entre os quais três crianças.
Em Haret Hreik, no subúrbio sul de Beirute, Israel lançou, aproximadamente, oitenta bombardeios contra a população civil – segundo o vice-prefeito Sadek Sleim. Reportagem especial para Opera Mundi
Para compreender a realidade no terreno, recomendamos esta entrevista da Noow Live a Mohammad Huraini, um activista e jornalista de Masafer Yatta. Apenas 23 minutos. 🔗 youtu.be/BE1FxLxJvJU 🔗 Para quem quiser ir mais a fundo na situação na Cisjordânia, a Drop Site News entrevistou Abdaljawad Omar, activista e académico da Universidade de Birzeit. @guilhotinainfo
Na sequência destes eventos, colonos e soldados israelitas deram início a uma campanha de ataques em toda a Cisjordânia. A 25 de Julho, outro palestiniano conseguiu roubar a arma a um colono, feriu-o e escapou do local. A onda de pogroms continuou nos dias seguintes. Como avisa o jornalista Andrey X, «israel está a criar as condições para transformar a limpeza étnica da Cisjordânia num genocídio». Além disso, o reg…
Resistência e pogroms na Cisjordânia A 24 de Julho, nos arredores da vila de Tell, a sul de Nablus, colonos armados e soldados israelitas estavam a assediar palestinianos quando um deles, Farooq Adnan Ramadan, roubou a arma a um dos colonos e o abateu no local. Um comandante das IDF foi também morto – não é claro se pelo herói palestiniano, se por fogo amigo quando os israelitas começaram a disparar indiscriminadame…
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @guilhotinainfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,050,227 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Guilhotina.info” (@guilhotinainfo), 1,424 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/guilhotinainfo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.