Recorded in 2019 as “مقاله نویسی علمی” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 19 days, net -29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,494–5,531 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 17:53
5,498
-8
20 Aug 2026, 22:44
5,506
+4
18 Aug 2026, 06:31
5,502
-7
15 Aug 2026, 15:55
5,509
-5
12 Aug 2026, 02:53
5,514
-7
9 Aug 2026, 08:31
5,521
-3
6 Aug 2026, 13:34
5,524
-3
6 Aug 2026, 03:35
5,527
no change
5 Aug 2026, 21:12
5,527
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
19m 35s
Average length
2m 27s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
خلاصهای از کتاب «The Art of Reading People»
کتابی که به درد هر کسی میخوره که با انسانها سر و کار داره
از استاد و پژوهشگر گرفته تا دانشجو و کارآفرین.
چطور با دقت در رفتار و زبان بدن،
بهجای قضاوت، واقعاً درک کنیم.
🎧 این پادکست کمکت میکنه تا در جلسات، مصاحبهها و ارتباطات علمی،
حرف نزدهی آدمها رو بشنوی با احترام و درک عمیق.
📌 گوش بده، ذخیره کن و برای کسی بفرست که ذهن تیز و دل آگاه داره.
اپيزود شماره 8️⃣
تلگرا…
بیشتر پژوهشگران و افراد خلاق در تلهی «آمادگی کامل» گیر میکنن.
منتظر میمونن تا زمان، بودجه یا انگیزهی ایدهآل برسه —
اما زمان درست، هیچوقت نمیرسه.
پیشرفت از دلِ حرکتهای ناقص میاد، نه از فکرهای کامل.
💬 این اپیزود دربارهی شجاعتِ عمل کردنه، وقتی هنوز مطمئن نیستی.
تلگرام
https://t.me/guide4paper
اینستاگرام
https://www.instagram.com/dr.gheibihayat?igsh=MXI1djM5cGtsZzJodw==
🏅 جایزه نوبل فیزیولوژی یا پزشکی ۲۰۲۵
به افتخار Mary E. Brunkow، Fred Ramsdell و Shimon Sakaguchi بابت کشفهایشان در زمینه تحمل ایمنی محیطی (Peripheral Immune Tolerance) اعطا شد.
---
🔬 موضوع کشفشان چه بود؟
آنها نشان دادند چطور سیستم ایمنی بدن از حمله به بافتهای خودی جلوگیری میکند.
مخصوصاً، نقش سلولهای T تنظیمکننده (Regulatory T cells) در کنترل فعالیت سیستم ایمنی و پیشگیری از بیماریهای خودایمنی در این کار تأث…
🧠 تفکر نقاد؛ مهارت فراموششدهی دانشگاهی
چند بار یه مقاله یا پست علمی دیدی و سریع باورش کردی،
بدون اینکه از خودت بپرسی: «از کجا معلوم؟»
تفکر نقاد یعنی قبل از اینکه بپذیری، بفهمی.
قبل از اینکه باور کنی، بررسی کنی.
یعنی جرأت پرسیدن، حتی وقتی همه سکوت میکنن.
در این پادکست یاد میگیری چطور مثل یه پژوهشگر حرفهای
شواهد رو تحلیل کنی، فرضیات رو به چالش بکشی
و از پشتِ دادهها به حقیقت برسی.
🎧 گوش بده و یاد بگیر چطور درس…
🎧 بیشتر تصمیمهای ما از دو نقطه میآن: ترس یا خواسته.
ترس ما رو محدود میکنه، ولی خواسته مسیر رشد رو نشون میده.
تو انتخابهات، ببین از کدومطرف داری حرکت میکنی؟ 🌱
تلگرام
@guide4paper
اینستاگرام
https://www.instagram.com/dr.gheibihayat?igsh=MXI1djM5cGtsZzJodw==
✨ همه میدونیم شبکهسازی کلید رشد و پیشرفته؛ اما کمتر کسی یادمون داده چطور مثل حرفهایها این کارو انجام بدیم.
تو این پادکست به زبون ساده برات میگم چطور ارتباطهایی بسازی که واقعاً آیندهساز باشن. 🎙️🤝
تلگرام
@guide4paper
اینستاگرام
https://www.instagram.com/dr.gheibihayat?igsh=MXI1djM5cGtsZzJodw==
از کدهای باینری تو آزمایش خون تا کیوبیتهای جادویی تو شبیهسازی دارو! 💉 تو این ریلز، سفری به دنیای کامپیوترها داریم که دارن پزشکی رو متحول میکنن
https://www.instagram.com/dr.gheibihayat?igsh=MXI1djM5cGtsZzJodw==
«میدونستی علم تونسته قلب یه بدن مرده رو بعد از یه ساعت دوباره به تپش بندازه؟ تکنولوژی OrganEx با یه محلول جادویی پر از اکسیژن و آنتیاکسیدان، سلولهای زامبی رو بیدار میکنه! این یعنی آیندهی پیوند عضو و شاید حتی نجات مغز بعد از سکته. مرگ دیگه خط پایان نیست—علم داره بازی رو عوض میکنه!
https://www.instagram.com/dr.gheibihayat?igsh=MXI1djM5cGtsZzJodw==
لطفا تا انتها ببینید و شیر کنید
@guide4paper
instagram.com/Dr.gheibihayat
Signed Aria Hayat
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @guide4paper. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 February 2023 to 24 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@guide4paper named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@gheibi65 named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رشد فردی و آکادمیک” (@guide4paper), 5,498 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/guide4paper.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.